thickest part of your calf vs. thinnest part of your ankle region?
16.5" vs. 9.5"
so I'm a 1.74 ratio
16.5" vs. 9.5"
so I'm a 1.74 ratio
what is your cankle ratio???
14,931 Views |
70 Replies |
Last: 11 yr ago by Uncle Howdy
You sound really fn fat
yes, that's me, FAT
rough estimate with a lanyard and ruler at work:
12.5
to 7.25
so 1.73?
12.5
to 7.25
so 1.73?
What's a good ratio for this?
[This message has been edited by ColinAggie (edited 7/8/2014 10:50a).]
[This message has been edited by ColinAggie (edited 7/8/2014 10:50a).]
14 1/8" and 8 3/8"
1.69 ratio
1.69 ratio
quote:
14 1/8" and 8 3/8"
1.69 ratio
Man legs.
^you would have a 69 ratio
I notice persons of certain ethnicities often basically have no calves to speak of. They're legs are shaped like cones below the knee.
17-1/8" x 9-5/8", so 1.78
13" and 7" (odd that they are exact)
so 1.86 ratio
so 1.86 ratio
quote:
Man legs.
Haha, hardly. I've got skinny legs.
true. It seems yours arent much bigger than mine.
I'm just glad we arent doing thigh size.
I need to work out a little weight there
I'm just glad we arent doing thigh size.
I need to work out a little weight there
likely 1:1 I have bird legs
[This message has been edited by ragoo (edited 7/8/2014 11:08a).]
[This message has been edited by ragoo (edited 7/8/2014 11:08a).]
"17.5 x "9.25
1.89
[This message has been edited by AgBass01 (edited 7/8/2014 11:10a).]
1.89
[This message has been edited by AgBass01 (edited 7/8/2014 11:10a).]
I have giant calves from marching band that have never really gone down in size so I'm guessing my ratio is high. Not taking out the measuring tape at work though.
Gay men usually worry about the size of their cankles.
You people are doing the math wrong. The ankle circumference should be entered first divided by the calf circumference. Thus as ratios get closer to 1 the cankles become more prevalent. Makes for easier judgment.
...
I've broken two rulers and one engineer's scale trying to measure the circumference of my ankle.
quote:
I've broken two rulers and one engineer's scale trying to measure the circumference of my ankle.
string, lanyard, anything flexible. then lay next to ruler to get measurement. Keeps you from breaking rulers
Somewhere between Britney Spears and Alicia Keys.
Well I have muscular thighs from bowling and working out and very small ankles so I say my ratio is quite small. I'll measure when I get home.
what do your thighs have to do with cankles?
quote:
You people are doing the math wrong. The ankle circumference should be entered first divided by the calf circumference. Thus as ratios get closer to 1 the cankles become more prevalent. Makes for easier judgment.
This is true actually
16 inches to 10 inches for me
so, 1.6
[This message has been edited by mid90 (edited 7/8/2014 12:39p).]
so, 1.6
[This message has been edited by mid90 (edited 7/8/2014 12:39p).]
Argh calf sorry. Been a long day.
Cankles will approach 1 no matter which number goes on top.
If you put the ankle at the top, your scale is restricted to between 1 and 0 which may make reading the ratios slightly less intuitive as you bring diminishing returns into play.
If you put the ankle at the top, your scale is restricted to between 1 and 0 which may make reading the ratios slightly less intuitive as you bring diminishing returns into play.
Not so subtle display of Birkenstocks
[This message has been edited by Sotheysay (edited 7/8/2014 1:35p).]
[This message has been edited by Sotheysay (edited 7/8/2014 1:35p).]
Featured Stories
See All
6:00
1d ago
4.0k
Defense in Review feat. Sean Porter: Miami 10, Texas A&M 3
by Billy Liucci
5:44
1d ago
3.0k
The Film Room: Miami 10, Texas A&M 3
by Stephen McGee
5:21
1d ago
1.4k
LB Blitz: Miami 10, Texas A&M 3
by Sean Porter
4:54
1d ago
1.5k
Pick 'Em & Rip 'Em sponsored by PrizePicks: Week 18
by Matthew Dawson