Great team goal there.
shack009 said:Seemed like such a "play it safe" move when the obvious move was to sit Hakanpaa for Lundkvist and go with one attacking D and one defensive D per pairing...FWAppraiser said:
This Suter/Hakanpaa thing isn't going to work.
It's very debatable, but I'd say Suter is the bigger liability.FWAppraiser said:shack009 said:Seemed like such a "play it safe" move when the obvious move was to sit Hakanpaa for Lundkvist and go with one attacking D and one defensive D per pairing...FWAppraiser said:
This Suter/Hakanpaa thing isn't going to work.
With Tanev on the team, Hakanpaa makes no sense anymore. They need to either roll with Lundkvist or make another move. The only reason to even keep Hakanpaa around is in case you need additional size against a particular playoff opponent.