Center
6′11″
/
231 lbs
Ipswich, England
Sophomore
Aggies push Kentucky to two overtimes, fall 70-64
Not a soul gave Texas A&M a chance to even keep it respectable against the nation's No. 1 team, but the Danuel House-led Aggies fought to come up just short of a monumental upset — by about fifteen feet.
Five Thoughts: Alabama 65, Texas A&M 44
Though the Tide is a good team, the Aggies' defeat to open conference play and what led to it are causes for concern and problems in need of immediate fixing. With Kentucky up next, where will A&M find its answers?
TODAY: Texas A&M vs. Hartford, 4:00 pm
The Aggies' final non-conference matchup will bring the Hawks to Reed Arena in a game that should present A&M a chance to work on its personnel heading into SEC play. A few players in particular are due up.
Five Thoughts: Texas A&M 87, New Orleans 65
The Aggies were hardly tested in their return home, but that increasingly seems to be a testament to the roster that's only beginning to gel. Leadership, shooting and more are evident — so what comes next?
Five Thoughts: Texas A&M 72, Mississippi State 52
Finally putting on a performance befitting their potential, A&M broke out of its losing funk with a home win that was dominant in many phases. Logan Lee examines the big changes and shares Alex Caruso's take.
All Updates
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.