Antwan Space
Texas A&M
#24
F

Antwan Space

Forward
6′8″ / 235 lbs
DeSoto, TX
Junior

News Feed

Five Thoughts: Texas A&M 80, Auburn 55
9 yr ago by Logan Lee
Five Thoughts: Texas A&M 80, Auburn 55
Days removed from a difficult loss to Arkansas, the Aggies did what they've done time and time again this season — rebound in impressive fashion. This time, however, they made an example out of the Tigers.
Three for Four: A&M visits Tennessee for pivotal matchup
9 yr ago by Olin Buchanan
Three for Four: A&M visits Tennessee for pivotal matchup
The Aggies have never lost to the Volunteers since entering the SEC; by continuing that trend, they could achieve something else they've never done in SEC play. The key lies in two weaknesses-turned-strengths.
Aggies push Kentucky to two overtimes, fall 70-64
9 yr ago by Olin Buchanan
Aggies push Kentucky to two overtimes, fall 70-64
Not a soul gave Texas A&M a chance to even keep it respectable against the nation's No. 1 team, but the Danuel House-led Aggies fought to come up just short of a monumental upset — by about fifteen feet.
Five Thoughts: Texas A&M 81, Youngstown State 63
9 yr ago by Logan Lee
Five Thoughts: Texas A&M 81, Youngstown State 63
The Texas A&M basketball team defeated the Youngstown State Penguins 81-63 on Saturday behind big days from Jalen Jones and Danuel House. Former A&M guard Logan Lee shares his thoughts on the game.
Five Thoughts: Texas A&M 59, College of Charleston 50
9 yr ago by Logan Lee
Five Thoughts: Texas A&M 59, College of Charleston 50
Another slow start left room for improvement and the Aggies have more development to do, but there is an indisputably different quality about this team through three games. How quickly can it take the next step?
All Updates

Videos

(1 Total)
5/31/2012
Coach Cyprien discusses summer workouts, incoming players

Photos

(46 Total)
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.