Guard
6′2″
/
185 lbs
Sydney, OH
Sidney
Senior
3/23/2023
Reed Report: Wrapping up 2022-23 & looking ahead to A&M's future
3/4/2023
The Loochador Podcast: Ags topple Tide to cap historic conference run
2/25/2023
Lengthy cold stretch dooms No. 25 Texas A&M at The Hump, 69-62
2/10/2023
Mark French breaks down A&M's path to the NCAA Tournament
1/27/2023
French: Impactful point-guard play can carry A&M hoops into March
1/6/2023
Mark French's keys to a successful five-game stretch for Texas A&M
12/26/2022
Williams & Co. still searching for answers ahead of Tuesday's contest
5/10/2022
Logan Lee talks Aggie basketball roster additions, early look at 2022 team
2/18/2022
Andrew Monaco talks hoops back in win column, spring ball around the corner
1/31/2022
Around Aggieland (1/31)
1/28/2022
Around Aggieland (1/28)
1/27/2022
Despite late lead, Aggies drop third straight as No. 19 LSU prevails, 70-64
1/23/2022
Despite comeback, Texas A&M falls to Arkansas in overtime, 76-73
1/20/2022
5 Thoughts: No. 12 Kentucky 64, Texas A&M 58
1/17/2022
Around Aggieland (1/17)
1/14/2022
Streaking Aggies must refrain from looking past Missouri on Saturday
1/10/2022
Around Aggieland (1/10)
1/4/2022
Thanks to 'Kevin': Marcus Williams' heroic shot beats Georgia, 81-79
12/28/2021
Voice of the Aggies: Talking A&M football, hoops with Andrew Monaco
12/20/2021
Around Aggieland (12/20)
12/18/2021
Aggies dominate Oregon State in 83-73 road win
12/3/2021
Around Aggieland (12/3)
11/15/2021
Around Aggieland (11/15)
2/1/2021
Around Aggieland (2/1)
2/1/2021
Buzz Williams discusses Aggie basketball's first win in the Little Apple
1/18/2021
Around Aggieland (1/18)
12/14/2020
Around Aggieland (12/14)
11/30/2020
Around Aggieland (11/30)
3/20/2020
Thornton: Buzz & the Aggies will be able to build on this foundation
2/19/2020
John Thornton analyzes keys to victory for Texas A&M in Tuscaloosa
2/3/2020
Buzz Williams analyzes 1-1 road swing, emergence of Jonathan Aku
1/28/2020
Ags dominate glass, Mitchell scores 23 as A&M upsets Tennessee, 63-58
1/21/2020
Texas A&M fends off a late Missouri surge to survive a road scare, 66-64
1/11/2020
Aggies get their fifth win in six games, dominate Vanderbilt in Nashville
11/21/2019
Thornton: Remaining on court at half indicative of Buzz's coaching style
4/16/2019
John Pugliese offers in-depth analysis of recent Aggie basketball commits
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.