Guard
6′5″
/
191 lbs
Flower Mound, TX
Senior
Thoughts on A&M's loss to Louisiana Tech
The season's end was a final example of a myriad of disappointments down the stretch, several of which need to be figured out before looking toward next year. Yet, as to Monday's actual result, the reason is simple.
3:13
Locker Room Chat: Jordan Green on A&M's opening NIT win
The 2-seed Aggies hosted Montana to open the 2015 National Invitation Tournament, and they lived up to their billing. A&M's senior guard shared his perspective after an 81-64 win that kept his final season going.
6:16
Get to Know... A&M guard Jordan Green
Jordan Green has blossomed into a leader of the A&M basketball team both on and off the court. Heavily involved in community service, Green has spent time speaking to kids and teaching them life lessons.
Five Thoughts: Alabama 61, Texas A&M 60
A swirling combination of negative factors, some out of A&M's control and some entirely its fault, was too much for the Aggies to overcome in a game they needed to win at home. The bottom line remains the same.
17:11
Missing House, Aggies falter against Bama in finale
Even without its leading scorer, Texas A&M held a double-digit lead at halftime. It went by the wayside in a struggle of a second half that led to a missed final shot and a 61-60 Tide victory with the Aggies' NCAA hopes potentially in the balance.
All Updates
3/10/2015
Get to Know... A&M guard Jordan Green
12/7/2012
Five Thoughts: A&M 62, SFA 54
8/14/2012
A three-pack of basketball questions and more with Logan
4/5/2012
Aggie basketball's master plan according to Billy Kennedy
11/29/2011
Jordan v. Jordan: Green takes Kirkland through fish season
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.