Catcher
6′0″
/
190 lbs
Kerrville, TX
Sophomore
Diamond Notes End of Season Edition: what to expect from A&M in 2020
After failing to make it out of a regional for the second consecutive season, the A&M baseball must now focus on preparing the 2020 season. Gabe Bock takes a deep dive into how the Aggies roster might look once Opening Day rolls around in February.
13:33
Diamond Notes: Pitching staff delivers again for A&M team struggling at the plate
The pitching staff again headlined the week for the A&M baseball team as the Aggies' starters all notched impressive performances on the mound. However, the maroon and white again struggled at the dish. Gabe Bock analyzes the week in Aggie baseball with a big weekend slate ahead.
8:22
Pitching and defense the difference as Texas A&M defeats UIC, 3-1
Texas A&M downed the Flames of Illinois-Chicago, 3-1, on Friday night as John Doxakis earned his second win on the season. While the A&M bats didn't do much tonight, the Aggies leaned on their experienced pitching staff and excellent glove work to earn the victory.
11:29
Diamond Notes: Aggies pile up wins, reasons for optimism in opening series
Texas A&M swept a solid Fordham club on opening weekend. Perhaps more importantly, both Aggie veterans and newcomers showed a number of encouraging signs, starting with the dominance of three lefty starters and several impressive performances at the plate.
Team Maroon takes Omaha Cup, defeats Pinstripes 5-3
Team Maroon was able to secure a win for the championship game this afternoon behind a solid pitching performance from Jonathan Childress. The Aggies will look to roll a productive fall camp into the season, which begins this February.
All Updates
2/25/2019
Diamond Notes: Pitching staff delivers again for A&M team struggling at the plate
2/18/2019
Diamond Notes: Aggies pile up wins, reasons for optimism in opening series
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.