Texas A&M Football

Deluded push for 24 teams would dilute the CFP

There is currently a push being made to expand the College Football Playoff field to 24 teams, with Greg Sankey and the SEC pushing back on doubling the size of the bracket. An expansion to 24 participants would dilute the field and lessen the importance of the regular season.
May 19, 2026
10k Views
22 Comments
Story Poster
Photo by Kirby Lee-Imagn Images

In many ways, 24 is great.

A day has 24 hours. Pure gold has 24 karats.

The TV show ‘24’ was a thriller that lasted nine seasons.

Willie Mays, Ken Griffey Jr. and Kobe Bryant wore 24.

So did Barry Bonds, Rickey Henderson and Marshawn Lynch.

Jeff Gordon drove car No. 24.

But 24 isn’t great for the College Football Playoff.

Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti is pushing to expand the CFP field to 24 teams, doubling the current field.

Bigger isn’t necessarily better. Ask anybody who’s sought a prescription for Ozempic.

A 24-team playoff would dilute the field while simultaneously lessening the importance of the regular season.

Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images
Indiana won last year’s national title in the second iteration of a 12-team field.

Changes in the CFP are obviously needed. The inclusion of Tulane and James Madison last season proved as much.

Adding 12 more teams isn’t the answer. The CFP should recognize excellence rather than reward a team for being pretty good.

Football expansion proponents often try to justify their point of view by referencing the NCAA Basketball Tournament, which is expanding from 68 to 76 teams.

They point out that roughly 20 percent of basketball teams will participate in March Madness.

Meanwhile, fewer than 10 percent of football teams are involved in the playoffs.

“(A 24-team football playoff) is going to create more opportunity,” Oregon coach Dan Lanning said in an ESPN article. “Just like March Madness is great in the spring for basketball, it'll be good for our sport."

Let’s be realistic. Mid-major conference teams like Butler, Gonzaga, Florida Atlantic, Loyola Chicago and San Diego State have been serious national championship contenders.

Will Huffman, TexAgs
Texas A&M made its College Football Playoff debut in 2025.

Mid-majors don’t win in football. In last year’s playoff, Tulane lost to Ole Miss, 41-10, and James Madison fell to Oregon, 51-34.

Cincinnati, then of the American Athletic Conference, was in the four-team playoff of 2021. The Bearcats did not manage a touchdown in a 27-6 loss to Alabama.

But, of course, the Big Ten’s motivation is to add more Big Ten teams, not mid-majors.

That could be done without doubling the playoff field.

Southeastern Conference commissioner Greg Sankey favors an expansion to 16 teams.

That makes more sense. A 16-team field ensures every team must win the same number of games to capture a national championship.

It also wouldn’t necessarily dilute the playoff field. As much as it hurts to admit, Texas and Notre Dame deserved to be in the playoff field last year.

Strong arguments could have been made for Vanderbilt, BYU and perhaps Iowa of the Big Ten, too.

A 24-team field is too much. A 16-team field could be more inclusive and still be exclusive.

22 Comments
Discussion from...

Deluded push for 24 teams would dilute the CFP

8,389 Views | 22 Replies | Last: 11 days ago by Blonde Coffee Beans
BboroAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's just a matter of time before CFB is unwatchable…
Blonde Coffee Beans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BboroAg said:

It's just a matter of time before CFB is unwatchable…

Millionaires want to be billionaires
Billionares want more

Yes, College football will be a shell of its former self at some point. For some, its already gone
"I don't care about your feelings OP. I'm not going to let fandom replace reason, thought, and history"
TexanJeff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
24 teams will be just stupid.

The greatest thing about college football has always been that the entire regular season is the playoffs.

For a long time. It was unique in that aspect for these guys to throw it away for a little bit more money it's so stupid cause there's already so much ****ing money.
Nothing says excellence like a Blue Diamond
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The big 10 wants 24 because that helps their TV partner.

The SEC wants 16 because that helps their TV partner.

Neither side cares about college football, and frankly no one has given it much thought over the last thirty years as it was transformed from a passionate, regional, quirky institution into a triple A NFL minor league.
kevmiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dilluted? More playoff teams equals more PLAYOFF GAMES?
I mean if you would rather watch SEC teams vs Mercer and South Carolina State..be my guest.
Ill take more playoff games.

Ill never understand how anyone could be against more meaningful games.
More teams also means it creates more interest in mid and late season matchups that otherwise wouldnt mean much

kevmiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexanJeff said:

24 teams will be just stupid.

The greatest thing about college football has always been that the entire regular season is the playoffs.

For a long time. It was unique in that aspect for these guys to throw it away for a little bit more money it's so stupid cause there's already so much ****ing money.

Yeah and now 2 teams that would be eliminated in late October because they have 2 losses now have playoff implications.. it doesnt bring less value to the regular season. It brings more value and creates more games of interest.
Quit looking at it one sided
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7295785/2026/05/21/college-football-playoff-24-teams-history-expansion/?source=user_shared_article&unlocked_article_code=1.kVA.Srpc.1nj1yylDNC30


Utah. The Utes won the Pac-12 twice but never made the real Playoff. However, in a 24-team world, they would have been in the bracket an astounding eight times. Coach Kyle Whittingham's legacy likely would have been rewritten by how they performed in those games, but the program looks different in an expanded playoff and might stand to gain as much as anyone.

Iowa. The Hawkeyes have only sniffed the actual Playoff once since its inception, finishing fifth in 2015, but in an expanded 24-team field, Iowa would have earned six bids. That would be tied for 13th-most nationally.

North Carolina State: The Wolfpack have never played for an ACC title nor made the CFP but would have qualified five times in a 24-team field, tied for second-most (with Florida State) among ACC teams.

Oklahoma State: Under Mike Gundy, the Cowboys never cracked the Playoff field, but they would have done so six times in nine years from 2015 to 2023, second-most behind Utah in the current Big 12.

USC: The Trojans also have never made the Playoff but would have had seven appearances under three different coaches.

LincolnBorglum79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I much prefer 16 teams but 24 can be worked out if you just follow the college baseball model. Just select 8 regional hosts with 2 other teams in a 3 team regional. Still 8 byes but they all know who they are playing week 2 of the playoffs. Those 8 winners are playing 4 games on NY day, 2 more Jan 7 and the championship Jan 14. You could even just leap to 32 and make each regional 4 teams. No byes,
TyperWoods
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unpopular opinion:

24 is fine. Use some of the worthless bowl games as playoffs to give them a little value. Make it 4 "regionals", 6 teams each region. Top 2 each region get a first round bye in that region. Regional winners finish with a 4 team tourney.


More teams does make the late season less important for the zero or one loss teams. But, it makes late games more important for two and even three loss teams, and there are more of them fighting it out for that coveted 25th and 26th spot.


But, who are we fooling...the CFP Committee will screw that up too.
lagoag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
12 is fine where it is but stop letting in these mid-major schools that have no business playing with the big boys. If they want in the playoffs they need to schedule have X amount of wins against P4 teams. But 16 teams could work but once again that could let in more mid-majors.
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lagoag said:

12 is fine where it is but stop letting in these mid-major schools that have no business playing with the big boys. If they want in the playoffs they need to schedule have X amount of wins against P4 teams. But 16 teams could work but once again that could let in more mid-majors.


The G5 schools don't really get to call up P4 schools and schedule them.

My preference would be P4 have their own division and playoff, with G5 doing the same, and no P4 games at all against G5 schools, or FCS teams for that matter.

However, if 25% of a P4 team's schedule is going to be against bad G5 teams, then put in G5 teams in the playoff.


Those can be the opening round games, hosted at the higher seeds campus in a crazy playoff atmosphere. And the #1 and #2 seeds must come from winners of the CCG. 3-16 or 3-24 can be up to committee.


There is no need to have the bowls involved until the championship game. Neutral-site games are what devalue the regular season.
El Chupacabra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
12 is too many. 16 is stupid. 24 is a censored word that rhymes with 'farted'
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To be clear: the Big Ten has outmaneuvered Sankey. He can pull out if he wishes but he has the support to expand to 24 and merely needs to have a few SEC schools either lead the charge to pull out if of the CFP or expand it.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
the playoff has to expand since 9-3 SEC teams are being left out

and with the stupid 9-game conference schedule...there will be a whole bunch more 9-3 teams each season
Lathspell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
12 is perfectly fine. We just need to remove auto bids for G5 teams.
NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Chupacabra said:

12 is too many. 16 is stupid. 24 is a censored word that rhymes with 'farted'

Word for word this is what I was gonna post.

8 is fine. If you are 9-12 you have no standing to claim you're the best in the country.
Ag in ATL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If the B1G wants more teams in the CFP, there's a simple solution. More schools win more games.
AGSmith
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W said:

the playoff has to expand since 9-3 SEC teams are being left out

and with the stupid 9-game conference schedule...there will be a whole bunch more 9-3 teams each season


"The Playoff must be 24 because 8-4 and 7-5 B1G teams are missing out" - Tony Pettiti (probably)
JustisWalkert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Any game outside the top 12 is just a glorified bowl game
He is Ass My Dude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If its 23 vs 24 and 22 vs 21, I dont have a problem with it. But it wont be that and 24 vs 5 probably wont be compelling. It could though, considering how Indiana used a non power 4 program to build a NC.

Maybe some kinda of play-in for 9-16 teams to earn a way into a tighter playoff.
Gnome Sayin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
but but but but.....number 25 was robbed!
Blonde Coffee Beans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Chupacabra said:

12 is too many. 16 is stupid. 24 is a censored word that rhymes with 'farted'

Help me out here, fellas, is he saying its scharted?
"I don't care about your feelings OP. I'm not going to let fandom replace reason, thought, and history"
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.