Status:
Signed
School Preferences
School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Texas A&M
Signed
Baylor
None
Colorado
None
Duke
None
Louisiana Lafayette
None
New Mexico State
None
North Texas
None
Ole Miss
None
Sam Houston
None
SMU
None
Texas Southern
None
Tulane
None
Tulsa
None
UTSA
None
Western Kentucky
None
+ 10 More
Videos
(10 Total)
12/28/2022
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
12/22/2022
Temple HC Scott Stewart says LB Taurean York is a 'culture creator'
12/22/2022
The Morning After: Jason Howell recaps A&M's Early Signing Day haul
12/20/2022
Liucci: Monday's double dip adds much-needed momentum ahead of ESD
12/19/2022
In-Home Visit: Countdown to the 2022 Early Signing Period, Day 2
12/19/2022
Texas A&M LB commit Taurean York details decision to join 2023 class
12/18/2022
In-Home Visit: Countdown to the 2022 Early Signing Period, Day 1
12/14/2022
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
12/30/1969
TAUREAN YORK JUNIOR SEASON
12/30/1969
TAUREAN YORK SENIOR YEAR SPECIAL TEAMS
Photos
(5 Total)
Career Stats
| Season | FF | FR | T | TFL | Sacks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2021
JR
|
4 | 5 | 141 | 17 | 4.5 |
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.×