Status:
Signed
Rating: 92
?
National Avg
Rating: 89.8
?
School Preferences
School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Texas A&M
Signed
Alabama
None
Appalachian State
None
Florida
None
Florida International
None
Florida State
None
Georgia
None
Iowa
None
Kentucky
None
LSU
None
Miami
None
Nebraska
None
Penn State
None
Pittsburgh
None
Rutgers
None
South Carolina
None
South Florida
None
Southern Miss
None
Syracuse
None
UCF
None
UTSA
None
Virginia
None
West Virginia
None
+ 18 More
Videos
(8 Total)
4/14/2021
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
2/3/2021
Recruiting Country, NSD Edition: 2021 Texas A&M class superlatives
11/3/2020
In-Home Visit: A&M hits Daily Double in Miami-Dade County with Daniels, Brown
9/9/2020
Ask Liucci, Part 1: Competition at wideout, young guys to watch & more
9/2/2020
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
8/19/2020
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
4/29/2020
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
4/15/2020
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
Photos
(1 Total)
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.×