Status:
Signed
HIGH SCHOOL
OL

Tank Jenkins

Offensive Lineman
6′4″ / 325 lbs
Montgomery, AL
Park Crossing
Class of 2018
Rating: 89
?

National Avg
Rating: 90.5
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Recruited by
Texas A&M
Signed
Arkansas
None
Auburn
None
Clemson
None
Florida State
None
Louisville
None
Oklahoma
None
Ole Miss
None
UCLA
None
 
+ 4 More

Staff Predictions

?
Confidence
Prediction
Name & Date
David Sandhop
on Feb 7, 2018
Jason Howell
on Jan 26, 2018

Videos

(2 Total)
A 2018 signing class three-pack with Billy Liucci
TANK DOG

Updates

1 yr ago by Ryan Brauninger
Spring Game visitor list
1 yr ago by Gabe Bock
A 2018 signing class three-pack with Billy Liucci
During Friday's edition of TexAgs Radio, Billy Liucci joined TexAgs Radio to discuss three topics pertaining to the 2018 Texas A&M football signing class including thoughts on his favorite signees in the class, the most likely instant impact players from the class and more.
1 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Scattershooting the 2018 Texas A&M Football Signing Class: Part 1
With Jimbo Fisher's first recruiting class mostly in the books at Texas A&M, it's time to take a wide view of how the Aggies fared on National Signing Day. Billy Liucci breaks down the class Fisher's staff inked on a short schedule in the first of this two-part series.
1 yr ago by TexAgs Recruiting
Signing Day Superlatives: Analyzing Texas A&M's 2018 class
With the 2018 Texas A&M Football signing class in the books, it's time to take a look at the biggest, fastest and most athletic players the Aggies inked. Inside, Ryan Brauninger and Jason Howell give their opinions on the biggest hitters, sleepers, personalities and more.
1 yr ago by TexAgs
WATCH HERE: 2018 National Signing Day Show
Featuring interviews with 2018 signees and high school coaches and analysis from Billy Liucci, Seth McKinney, Stephen McGee, Ryan Brauninger and others, TexAgs presents its four-hour Signing Day special in video form.
All Updates

Photos

(4 Total)

Career Stats

Season
2018
SR
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.