COVID-19 takes serious toll on heart healtha full year after recovery

3,833 Views | 10 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by FlyRod
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Giant study shows striking rise in long-term heart and vessel disease

https://www.science.org/content/article/covid-19-takes-serious-toll-heart-health-full-year-after-recovery

Quote:

Now, the first large study to assess cardiovascular outcomes 1 year after SARS-CoV-2 infection has demonstrated that the virus' impact is often lasting. In an analysis of more than 11 million U.S. veterans' health records, researchers found the risk of 20 different heart and vessel maladies was substantially increased in veterans who had COVID-19 1 year earlier, compared with those who didn't. The risk rose with severity of initial disease and extended to every outcome the team examined, including heart attacks, arrhythmias, strokes, cardiac arrest, and more. Even people who never went to the hospital had more cardiovascular disease than those who were never infected.

The results are "stunning … worse than I expected, for sure," says Eric Topol, a cardiologist at Scripps Research. "All of these are very serious disorders. … If anybody ever thought that COVID was like the flu this should be one of the most powerful data sets to point out it's not." He adds that the new study "may be the most impressive Long Covid paper we have seen to date."

Others agree the results of the study, published in Nature Medicine on 7 February, are powerful. "In the post-COVID era, COVID might become the highest risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes," greater than well-documented risks such as smoking and obesity, says Larisa Tereshchenko, a cardiologist and biostatistician at the Cleveland Clinic, who recently conducted a similar, much smaller analysis. She cautions that the new study will need to be replicated, and that it was retrospective, possibly introducing inaccuracies such as incorporating faulty diagnoses from patient records. "It looked back. We have to do prospective studies to calculate accurate estimates."

Quote:

The researchers drew on the largest set of electronic health records in the United States, at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). They analyzed data from nearly 154,000 people who contracted COVID-19 between March 2020 and January 2021, and who survived at least 30 days after becoming infected. They also identified two control groups: 5.6 million people who sought VA care during the pandemic but were not diagnosed with COVID-19, and 5.9 million people who sought VA care in 2017.

One limitation of the study is that the veteran population skews older, white, and male: In all three groups, about 90% of patients were men and 71% to 76% were white. Patients were in their early 60s, on average.

The researchers controlled for the possibility that the people who contracted COVID-19 were already more prone to developing cardiovascular disease. They found that "COVID is an equal opportunity offender," Al-Aly says. "We found an increased risk of cardiovascular problems in old people and in young people, in people with diabetes and without diabetes, in people with obesity and people without obesity, in people who smoked and who never smoked."

aggiebrad94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I expect this will show up on Life Insurance applications and underwriting ASAP.

Might be a good reason to not ever test with mild symptoms or at least not at a Dr.'s office.
Marcus Brutus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I assume his includes omicron? If so, then folks who have not been vaxxed should avoid it because the data is showing greater chance of infection and disease for those folks.
Cowbird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That wouldn't matter, all they would need to do is test for antibodies to look for previous infection.
Capitol Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

One limitation of the study is that the veteran population skews older, white, and male: In all three groups, about 90% of patients were men and 71% to 76% were white. Patients were in their early 60s, on average.

The researchers controlled for the possibility that the people who contracted COVID-19 were already more prone to developing cardiovascular disease. They found that "COVID is an equal opportunity offender," Al-Aly says. "We found an increased risk of cardiovascular problems in old people and in young people, in people with diabetes and without diabetes, in people with obesity and people without obesity, in people who smoked and who never smoked."


The first paragraph appears to contradict the 2nd paragraph regarding the "findings" as most were older, in one ethnic group and men. Granted, they do state that there needs to be many more studies done and I get that. But given what they say here, I do not feel that they can use this study to make the findings that Covid was equal opportunity at all. Subsequent studies may very well find that no doubt, but I am still skeptical.

Also, why just mention "obesity" and not "over weight" or "high body fat %"? Maybe just the writer choosing to state that to mean all, but I would think being overweight even if not obese would be worth noting in the study. They might have of course...
FlyRod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interesting study, and to me not surprising for two reasons. First, as others have noted, the age of those in the study suggests a demographic already prone to cardiovascular issues.

But second, we have known for over a year that Covid is an inflammatory disorder, which obese people are especially vulnerable to. Maybe Covid causes this inflammation or just as likely, exacerbates it in high risk people.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/covid-risks-heart-problems-remain-elevated-year-rcna15608
FlyRod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would add to my previous note that we're talking about two years (and I know that seems like 20 to long haulers) but that's not terribly long, and so maybe with a little more time the damage will heal?

And even more hopefully better treatments.
JOHN2010
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Now do the vaccine
NASAg03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FlyRod said:

I would add to my previous note that we're talking about two years (and I know that seems like 20 to long haulers) but that's not terribly long, and so maybe with a little more time the damage will heal?

And even more hopefully better treatments.
Not that I'm trying to send out the Grapesoda signal, but there has been research showing that cannabinoids help prevent or at least treat the issues associated with sars-cov-2, which would make sense as these compounds are know to be anti inflammatory.
Mike Shaw - Class of '03
FlyRod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Very interesting. I've been wondering if dosing on anti-inflammatory supplements might (might) mitigate the virus's inflammation pathways.

I'd also be real curious if there are studies connecting a low inflammation vs. high inflammation (ie tasty fried foods!) diet to Covid severity.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.