CDC weekly vax effectiveness by age or product

3,956 Views | 19 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Cooter00
Nosmo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#rates-by-vaccine-status

This is the most concise CDC report I have found concerning how the different vaccines are performing in the real world with respect to cases, deaths, and age.

There is a large data lag as the information is only thru September 4. But that is typical for CDC when dealing with deaths.

I would encourage you to open the link and create your own report rather than my examples below. And remember the data is based on occurrences per week per 100,000 population.

The week ending September 4.

Testing positive:

No Vax 666 / 100K population
Fully Vax 114 / 100K population
Moderna 87 / 100K population
Pfizer 126 / 100K population
J&J 150 / 100K population

Deaths:

No Vax 9.14 / 100K population
Fully Vax 0.74 / 100K population
Moderna 0.47 / 100K population
Pfizer 0.88 / 100K population
J&J 1.70 / 100K population

Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nosmo said:

https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#rates-by-vaccine-status

This is the most concise CDC report I have found concerning how the different vaccines are performing in the real world with respect to cases, deaths, and age.

There is a large data lag as the information is only thru September 4. But that is typical for CDC when dealing with deaths.

I would encourage you to open the link and create your own report rather than my examples below. And remember the data is based on occurrences per week per 100,000 population.

The week ending September 4.

Testing positive:

No Vax 666 / 100K population
Fully Vax 114 / 100K population
Moderna 87 / 100K population
Pfizer 126 / 100K population
J&J 150 / 100K population

Deaths:

No Vax 9.14 / 100K population
Fully Vax 0.74 / 100K population
Moderna 0.47 / 100K population
Pfizer 0.88 / 100K population
J&J 1.70 / 100K population




Given that the vaccinated population skews older and less healthy, these numbers are even better than they appear.
Another Doug
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
#teammoderna
Old Buffalo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In the words of my friend Alex Berenson:

If I cut your risk of being eaten by a shark in half, that's good - but not meaningful.

If i cut your risk of being hit while driving in half, that's good and meaningful.
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
JB99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
12 times more likely to be hospitalized unvaxxed vs. Vaxed.
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old Buffalo said:

In the words of my friend Alex Berenson:

If I cut your risk of being eaten by a shark in half, that's good - but not meaningful.

If i cut your risk of being hit while driving in half, that's good and meaningful.
Right, so when you consider that the average American is at least 10x more likely to have died from Covid in the past year than from a traffic fatality, I think "good and meaningful" would clearly apply here.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
Aston94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
94chem said:

Old Buffalo said:

In the words of my friend Alex Berenson:

If I cut your risk of being eaten by a shark in half, that's good - but not meaningful.

If i cut your risk of being hit while driving in half, that's good and meaningful.
Right, so when you consider that the average American is at least 10x more likely to have died from Covid in the past year than from a traffic fatality, I think "good and meaningful" would clearly apply here.


Exactly.
Forum Troll
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Testing positive:

No Vax 666 / 100K population
Fully Vax 114 / 100K population
To me this is the most interesting thing. All the vaccine detractors keep saying the vaccine doesn't prevention infection when the data is suggestive that it can and does.

Not perfect does not mean completely worthless.
Old Buffalo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
94% of deaths above 50.
53% of deaths above 75.
Average 4+ comorbidities at death.


My point is risk is relative.
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old Buffalo said:

94% of deaths above 50.
53% of deaths above 75.
Average 4+ comorbidities at death.


My point is risk is relative.


Most traffic fatalities have comorbidities too.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
Old Buffalo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If you don't understand how comorbidities impact you from a Heath perspective than from an action perspective, idk what to tell you.
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another Doug said:

#teammoderna
When I got my vaccine, they just happened to have Moderna. Good for me.
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old Buffalo said:

If you don't understand how comorbidities impact you from a Heath perspective than from an action perspective, idk what to tell you.


You can work on it after you figure out what to tell yourself. Finding the end of the equine trail to dihydrogen monoxide does not necessarily bring sufficient hydration to fruition.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
Old Buffalo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My sincerest apologies that the virus which with you put your enthusiasm towards has failed to meet the definition of success.
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
spherical
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
unvaxx at 666? cmon, that's too on the nose
El Chupacabra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unsophisticated. Unvaxxed. Unafraid.
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
spherical said:

unvaxx at 666? cmon, that's too on the nose


Don't even get started on the microchips.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old Buffalo said:

My sincerest apologies that the virus which with you put your enthusiasm towards has failed to meet the definition of success.


That makes no sense.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
BlackGoldAg2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old Buffalo said:

If I cut your risk of being eaten by a shark in half, that's good - but not meaningful.

I dunno, if I was a surfer or wade fisher or really anyone who spent meaningful amounts of time in close proximity to sharks it sure might be meaningful.
Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another Doug said:

#teammoderna


Implied 87% efficacy for Moderna against infection.

BuT VAcCinEs DoNt StOP ThE SpREad
Cooter00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why doesn't fully vaxxed = Moderna + Pfizer+ J&J?
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.