Lots of noise early in the year about dumping Biggio and Bagwell. Will be lots of noise in the offseason about "going young".
Food for thought:
Biggio's career 162-game averages prior to 2004 on the left, his 2004 projections in parentheses.
Runs 108 (106)
Hits 177 (187)
2b 37 (48)
HR 15 (25)
RBI 67 (65)
BA .287 (.288)
OBP .375 (.348)
SLG .432 (.476)
OPS .807 (.824)
What does that tell you? That in his 17th season in the majors, Biggio is better than his standard this year. That's impressive. I agree that he can be a defensive liability, but I argue that it's not only a good idea to keep him from a career achievement standpoint, but because he's still getting it done at the plate.
Next year, hopefully in an Astro uniform, Biggio will reach the following milestones, assuming no precipitous dropoff:
1700 runs scored, moving him into 24th all time - passing Winfield, Mantle, Brock, Kaline, Murray, Yount and Ripken, among others.
2800 hits, moving him into 42nd all time - passing Gehrig, Parker, Ted William & Andre Dawson, among others.
600 doubles, moving him into 13th all time - passing Gehringer, Boggs, Yount & possibly Ripken. Another standard season would move him into 7th or 8th all time.
250 HRs and 1000 RBI, both of which are none too shabby for a leadoff hitter not known as having much pop. For comparison purposes, the 100th all time HR hitter hit 297, and the 100th all time RBI man drove in 1244. Both are potentially reachable for Biggio, which would be pretty amazing.
Oh yeah, he'll also challenge for 3rd all time in HBP.
Now for Bagwell. The way many have described it, you'd think he's had the worst offensive season since Mendoza. Not the case.
162-game average, followed by projected 2004 numbers:
Runs 116 (108)
Hits 177 (155)
2b 38 (29)
HR 35 (28)
RBI 118 (86)
BB 107 (100)
BA .300 (.273)
OBP .411 (.389)
SLG .549 (.481)
OPS .960 (.870)
I think it's safe to say that he's having a subpar year by his standards, but he seems to be coming around (last week .333 BA, .500 OBP, .762 SLG) and even a relatively poor year for him is pretty freaking good.
He'll be an Astro next year, barring something odd. And, assuming he has a year fairly close to this one (I believe it's more likely that he'll do better, not worse), Jeff will hit the following milestones:
1700 runs scored which puts him in the same situation as Biggio (see above).
2400 hits, which puts him in the top 100 all time.
500 doubles, which puts him in the top 40 all time.
475 HRs, which puts him in the top 25 all time.
1600 RBI, which puts him in the top 25 all time.
1500 BBs, which puts him in roughly the top 15 all time.
There have been many who've had better seasons than Jeff, but not very many at all who have been as good as him for as long as him.
So, in summary, I think it would be a shame if either Craig or Jeff is gone next year. It would be a shame from a career perspective (how the hell could anyone want to see those guys in a different uniform?), AND from a 2005 perspective, because both guys are still much better than the average player.
If you made it this far, your thoughts?
Food for thought:
Biggio's career 162-game averages prior to 2004 on the left, his 2004 projections in parentheses.
Runs 108 (106)
Hits 177 (187)
2b 37 (48)
HR 15 (25)
RBI 67 (65)
BA .287 (.288)
OBP .375 (.348)
SLG .432 (.476)
OPS .807 (.824)
What does that tell you? That in his 17th season in the majors, Biggio is better than his standard this year. That's impressive. I agree that he can be a defensive liability, but I argue that it's not only a good idea to keep him from a career achievement standpoint, but because he's still getting it done at the plate.
Next year, hopefully in an Astro uniform, Biggio will reach the following milestones, assuming no precipitous dropoff:
1700 runs scored, moving him into 24th all time - passing Winfield, Mantle, Brock, Kaline, Murray, Yount and Ripken, among others.
2800 hits, moving him into 42nd all time - passing Gehrig, Parker, Ted William & Andre Dawson, among others.
600 doubles, moving him into 13th all time - passing Gehringer, Boggs, Yount & possibly Ripken. Another standard season would move him into 7th or 8th all time.
250 HRs and 1000 RBI, both of which are none too shabby for a leadoff hitter not known as having much pop. For comparison purposes, the 100th all time HR hitter hit 297, and the 100th all time RBI man drove in 1244. Both are potentially reachable for Biggio, which would be pretty amazing.
Oh yeah, he'll also challenge for 3rd all time in HBP.
Now for Bagwell. The way many have described it, you'd think he's had the worst offensive season since Mendoza. Not the case.
162-game average, followed by projected 2004 numbers:
Runs 116 (108)
Hits 177 (155)
2b 38 (29)
HR 35 (28)
RBI 118 (86)
BB 107 (100)
BA .300 (.273)
OBP .411 (.389)
SLG .549 (.481)
OPS .960 (.870)
I think it's safe to say that he's having a subpar year by his standards, but he seems to be coming around (last week .333 BA, .500 OBP, .762 SLG) and even a relatively poor year for him is pretty freaking good.
He'll be an Astro next year, barring something odd. And, assuming he has a year fairly close to this one (I believe it's more likely that he'll do better, not worse), Jeff will hit the following milestones:
1700 runs scored which puts him in the same situation as Biggio (see above).
2400 hits, which puts him in the top 100 all time.
500 doubles, which puts him in the top 40 all time.
475 HRs, which puts him in the top 25 all time.
1600 RBI, which puts him in the top 25 all time.
1500 BBs, which puts him in roughly the top 15 all time.
There have been many who've had better seasons than Jeff, but not very many at all who have been as good as him for as long as him.
So, in summary, I think it would be a shame if either Craig or Jeff is gone next year. It would be a shame from a career perspective (how the hell could anyone want to see those guys in a different uniform?), AND from a 2005 perspective, because both guys are still much better than the average player.
If you made it this far, your thoughts?