With the addition of Miami, the ACC will quickly become the best baseball conference in 2005.
The SEC will always be good (especially in the NCAA's eyes).
However, I think the Big XII will always be on an even keel with the Pac 10. Other than Stanford, they don't have a true dominant team (ASU kind of fizzled in the post season...after being #1 for a lot of the year.) USC has potential as does Arizona and sometimes Cal, but that's about it.
But, if we've learned anything, your conference ranking means nothing when it comes to the post season. If so, Southwest Missouri State should not have been in the CWS and Ohio State shouldn't have hosted a Super Regional. College baseball playoffs (like many other sports playoffs) is all about who gets hot at the right time. Had Rice played the post season like they played in mid-April, they wouldn't have won the title.
I agree that the Big XII (namely UT and A&M) won't be as good in '04 as they were in '03, but I also think that the next tier of teams (tech, Missouri, Oklahoma State) will be much stronger next year. I don't see the '04 Big XII having a dominant, runaway type team like Rice is in the WAC, but I do see them having about 7 teams that are virtually equal...kind of like the Big 10 is in football most years.
[This message has been edited by Luke The Drifter (edited 7/1/2003 4:58p).]