Would the Spurs be considered a dynasty...

184 Views | 9 Replies | Last: 20 yr ago by Sooner Born
DP^2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If they won it all this year?

If you don't think so, then would you also say that the Patriots weren't a dynasty either?

I'm just curious as to what the Spurs would have to do to be considered a dynasty in the sports world.
rcb05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Football and basketball are totally different. In football 3 Super Bowls in four years is the best any team has ever done, only the Cowboys and Patriots have done it.

In basketball winning 3 in 4 years is nothing special.

-Lakers won 5 out of 6 from 1948-54, 5 out of 9 from 1979-88, 3 in 4 years from 1984-88, and 3 in a row from 1999-2002. 14 total.
-Celtics won 8 in a row from 1958-66, and 11 out of 13 from 1956-69. 16 total.
-Bulls won 3 in a row twice (6 in 8 years) from 1990-98.

Spurs are pretty dang good, but not a dynasty yet.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
if they win it this year, they are most certainly a "dynasty" by my definition.

though, i am not really sure why any of this matters.

[This message has been edited by BMX Bandit (edited 1/6/2006 3:58p).]
moorehead01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have a feeling this thread will turn into a huge argument. I'm a Spurs fan and could care less whether anyone considers them a dynasty.
LestatBQ02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wouldnt be surprised to see the Spurs win it this year...

If they can pull it off next year then I would def call them a dynasty...

As is they are just damn good (which is frustrating!)
MassAggie97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Football and basketball are totally different. In football 3 Super Bowls in four years is the best any team has ever done, only the Cowboys and Patriots have done it.

In basketball winning 3 in 4 years is nothing special.

Yet only 2 basketball teams have managed to do it in the past 40 years (90's Bulls and the recent lakers).
Winning 3 in 4 is a major acheivement in any sport, especially now in the time of parity due to free agency and collective bargaining. Pat Riley once said winning back-to-back championships is the hardest thing in sports. Saying 3 out of 4 is "nothing special" is far from the truth, according to folks who have actually done it or come close.

quote:
Spurs are pretty dang good, but not a dynasty yet.

That's the point. The question is, if they win it THIS YEAR, will they be? The answer has to be an unequivocal YES. The Spurs have won 3 titles since '99, if they win one this year it means 3 out of the last 4, and 4 of the last 8. The only teams to win 4 titles in 8 years in recent memory are the 90's bulls and the 80's lakers.
They have held the league MVP trophy twice in that span.
They won a critical game 7 against the only other team to have its hands on the trophy since the last laker dynasty.
They have featured 3 first-ballot hall of famers (Robinson, Duncan and Popovich).
They have been awarded ESPN's "best franchise in sports" 2 out of 3 years, and have not left the top 5 since the award came into being in 2000.
They have topped 50 wins in all but a single season since 1989, and are currently on pace for 64 wins this season, making them the only team to top 57 wins in each of the last 6 seasons. They have the higest winning % in ANY sport since Tim Duncan signed on.

If they win another one this year (and the Pistons are making it look like that will be a tough chore), and you can't at that point call the Spurs a dynasty....then you ought to take the word dynasty out of the dictionary.
keithd03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I, like others have stated, hate when the media and fans use the word dynasty.
Who cares? It doesn't make the Spurs run any better or worse if they have this tag or not.

What if the Pistons win? Does everyon start talking about their dynasty potential?

I think the Bulls' run of 6 rings in around 8 years set thebar pretty high for the "dynasty" label.

SA-AG72
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From a past Texas Governatorial Candidate:

"Relax and enjoy it"
jmtamu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Football and basketball are totally different. In football 3 Super Bowls in four years is the best any team has ever done, only the Cowboys and Patriots have done it.

In basketball winning 3 in 4 years is nothing special.

Is this not freakin hilarious coming from a guy that roots for a team that has never even sniffed 1 Championship?
AnalogyAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rcb05

Did you ever stop to realize that every one of those teams you cited WAS considered a dynasty?

Winning 3 of 4 in any sport IS exceptional, and is certainly NOT "nothing special".
Sooner Born
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rcb = pwned
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.