...whya have a field of 64?
why not just have a field of 32?
this had 8 seeds as the lowest seeds, after all, with all of these years having passed by and an 8 seed being the lowest to ever win the thing, why not just have a field of 32?
stands to reason that 9 seeds and below have no shot to win...and do away with the auto bids to the small conferences...
when was the last non major conference team to win it all, anyway?
why not just have a field of 32?
this had 8 seeds as the lowest seeds, after all, with all of these years having passed by and an 8 seed being the lowest to ever win the thing, why not just have a field of 32?
stands to reason that 9 seeds and below have no shot to win...and do away with the auto bids to the small conferences...
when was the last non major conference team to win it all, anyway?