Has Texas A&M as a #4 Seed for the 2024 Tournament. Was not expecting to see us that high this time of year.

Most outlets have us ranked around #20 in their "way too early" preseason rankings... so it checks out.

When you think about what we return and the transfers coming in, we absolutely should be a 4 or 5 seed this year.

If you assume that they're taking into account the blatant bias the committee has against us then they're really saying we're going to have a 1-2 seed type season. Can't wait!

bobinator said:

---

If you assume that they're taking into account the blatant bias the committee has against us then they're really saying we're going to have a 1-2 seed type season. Can't wait!

---

That is what I was implying. We never get the credit we deserve. A little startled we were so high

I'm assuming we'll get a punishment seed again.

The seeding won't matter, they'll put us against a team that is either under seeded or a hot team heading to the tournament.

Everyone stop complaining like little b*tches before the season even starts. I'm just hoping for an injury free year and avoiding a non-conference start like last year. We do both of those and we'll have one hell of a year.

https://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story/_/page/bracketology/ncaa-bracketology-2024-march-madness-men-field-predictions

DON'T COMPLAIN ABOUT COMPLAINING BEFORE THE SEASON EVEN STARTS

****in' 4 seed matched up with Baylor. Figures Lunardi would pull some **** like this.

Come on New Mexico, don't disappoint me (again) Lobos.

In the past probably, and I know we had issues with the committee and tourney seeding, but national media/writers adore Buzz and he's won SEC CoTY twice already…

Belton Ag said:

---

****in' 4 seed matched up with Baylor. Figures Lunardi would pull some **** like this.

---

I thought we should've been matched against them last year in a 3-6 matchup in Denver, even without any narrative or storyline bs. But of course they found a way to match us with the Horns.

We can complain about Big 12 seedings all we want, but Creighton was really the 6 seed we should've been seeded higher than (look at the final bracketmatrix below from last year).

http://www.bracketmatrix.com/

miller0926 said:

---

Belton Ag said:

---

****in' 4 seed matched up with Baylor. Figures Lunardi would pull some **** like this.

---

I thought we should've been matched against them last year in a 3-6 matchup in Denver, even without any narrative or storyline bs. But of course they found a way to match us with the Horns.

We can complain about Big 12 seedings all we want, but Creighton was really the 6 seed we should've been seeded higher than (look at the final bracketmatrix below from last year).

http://www.bracketmatrix.com/

---

You probably know this but I was joking about being riled up by that.

Seems about right. I think most have us somewhere between 14-19 so a 4 seed would be in there. Can't wait to see the guys hit the court

Everyone complaining is just doing their preseason warmups!

I've been trying to think of something new and different to complain about. I'm sure I will find something eventually. I would be totally stoked with a 4 seed… but if we did better I would do a lot less complaining.

Roster Release Date:

https://12thman.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster

Talent from last year + grad transfers. Top 150 big man Brandon White out of NC for some additional depth. I see a lot of glue guys and versatility.

I like our chances.

Screw that…#1 seed and a FF is what I foresee!