http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8471301/

I guess I see the point, but come on.

http://texags.com/main/forum.reply.asp?topic_id=456018&forum_id=16

[This message has been edited by Davester (edited 7/6/2005 9:39a).]

Sorry. I don't read the Business & Politics board...dork.

[This message has been edited by SirWelker (edited 7/6/2005 9:39a).]

Fry him

I think he was only trying to help the discussion Welker...there's more information there.

You're a lawyer, what's his situation? I personally think it's BS, although I guess I can understand the principle behind it.

I know, when I edited it I realized you can't change the face thing, hence the no wink.

posted 8:37p, 7/5/2005



There is a lot more to this story then you guys know:

"In 1999, Texas State University, which owns the dam and the land around it, erected a fence to prohibit access to that part of the river. Later that year, the City Council enacted a swimming ban on that portion of the river. But Newman led a successful campaign to get the fences around the swimming hole removed and the ban relaxed.

In April, 22-year-old Jason Lee Bonnin, and a Texas State University student, drowned after he and three other restaurant workers jumped from the eatery into the river."



This is from the other board...I don't get what you're trying to say Davester? I mean, if the ban's been relaxed then it's not against the law anymore, correct? And if it was, wouldn't the guy that he saved have been arrested as well?

I am only pointing out that this guy has had issues with this law before, and has fought to have it removed. It would not shock me to findout he did more then just save the guy. I bet he tried to piss off the cops. Thats just the feeling I get reading this.