They are a sport's network, why the need to pick on unaccredited third tier schools?
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/big12/0-1-247/The-Big-12-ranked-in-academic-terms.html
[This message has been edited by Jock 97 (edited 8/24/2008 1:07p).]
quote:
Note: Oklahoma State and Texas Tech were both considered "Tier 3" schools and were not given rankings by U.S. World News & Report that were applicable for this comparison.
quote:
RedRaiderz11
...and here come the Ags with their one ounce of smack against Tech. If you new generation Aggies haven't figured out yet, tier status is based on funding received for a university, hence Tech attempting to increase research funds to become tier 1. What amazes me is how many of you tools actually believe that you are smarter than every living person with any relation to Tech. Tceh? Tards? (A politically incorrect and very offensive term by the way) Really? Grow up. There is a place for your kind, it's called France. I know I know, not all Aggies are like this. Hell, I've got a 2-percenter in my family. That is what you call them right? I guess it sucks losing 10 out of 13 to a tier 3 school, sorry 'bout ya.
On a side note, I would have expected OU's tuition to be higher.
quote:
10. Kansas State 32 130 $6,627/$16,931 95%


quote:
Edit: Oh, I've got an even better one for you, I got into A&M, yale, harvard, ut, ga tech and didn't go
quote:
Edit: Oh, I've got an even better one for you, I got into A&M, Johns Hopkins, Washington University, Davidson, Oberlin, Texas A&M Corpus Christi and Notre Dame, Pomona, and chose the Academic Stalwart of the Southwest, Texas Tech University, for those not paying attention, over them all......that proves how much of a Dumas I really am, huh. I'll just follow you into all of your threads and bolster your point about Tech grads being tards. Just let me know where we're going next.