Non destructive testing on oil platforms

1,818 Views | 15 Replies | Last: 7 yr ago by sniperag
moses1084ever
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I am working on a solution that involves installing radio networks throughout oil platforms. I've been told there are certain scenarios in which all sources of radio (rf) energy need to be shut down when there is radiographic non destructive testing taking place on the platform.

I've tried searching the interwebs but have only found a few obscure references that rf will interfere with digital radiography equipment.. however this is within the context of medical equipment, not offshore.

Anyone familiar with this?
evestor1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Radiography should have no issue with this.

It is likely ultrasonic NDT methods are the issue. Less advanced UT has issue with frequency and noise.
moses1084ever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks!
Oh Four Five
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Moses, you've made some posts that have me interested in what you're working on. Is it something you can discuss offline? If so, shoot me an email at my handle at gmail.
barney94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't know about radiographic testing, but you absolutely have to shut down all radios when working with explosives for perforating, setting plugs, etc.
Dr. Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barney94 said:

I don't know about radiographic testing, but you absolutely have to shut down all radios when working with explosives for perforating, setting plugs, etc.


This.
texan12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I do NDT on aircraft and have never heard of radiography affecting instruments or even armament. Or are you asking if radios interfere with radiography? I have never heard or been taught that as an issue either. In any open environment aren't there radio waves/ frequency always present? Have you looked into OSHA regs?
texan12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not sure about UT either, unless the sound is directly induced into the radio source...
moses1084ever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

I don't know about radiographic testing, but you absolutely have to shut down all radios when working with explosives for perforating, setting plugs, etc.

This makes a lot of sense. I worked in a live petrochemical plant for 5 years had never run into a situation requiring radio silence.
evestor1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I reread the OP. If for radiography, are you sure the shut down isn't because you are too close to radiation? In brief, being exposed to radiation is bad.

Is this what you are referring to?
TxAg20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barney94 said:

I don't know about radiographic testing, but you absolutely have to shut down all radios when working with explosives for perforating, setting plugs, etc.

This is getting very rare. Lots of radios going on multi-well pads. Even the wireline crew uses radios while picking up plugs and perf guns. You need coordination between wireline operator and crane operator while picking up tools into lubricator. Coordination between wireline operator and pump operator to open well and pump down.
texan12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah I don't know where this comes from. On aircraft, the pilot needs radio communication with ground and tower while strapped up with several kinds of explosives, not to mention radar etc. I think it's more of an issue with static (pulling out your phone from your pocket) but it sounds more terrifying that a signal could trigger an explosive so they just stick with that.
moses1084ever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
@Dan E-mail sent
halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never heard that one for X-ray, ut, or mag particle inspection Radio silence when handling perf guns .... absolutely
Dr. Doctor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Explosive initiators can take as little as 5 mW of power to start the reaction (milli watts). The radiated power can be picked up by the wire to the initiator (looks like an antenna), induce a current and then set off the explosive.

There are specific tests that have to be done for an electronic device to say it is 'radio safe'. But that takes lots of time and money, so it is easier to just make everyone turn off radios.

For reference, a drilling ship usually takes about 24 hours to certify radio silence.



Note: I worked for a competitor of explosive cutters and one of their selling points is their tools are radio safe and are non-explosive.

~egon
JTA1029
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TxAg20 said:

barney94 said:

I don't know about radiographic testing, but you absolutely have to shut down all radios when working with explosives for perforating, setting plugs, etc.

This is getting very rare. Lots of radios going on multi-well pads. Even the wireline crew uses radios while picking up plugs and perf guns. You need coordination between wireline operator and crane operator while picking up tools into lubricator. Coordination between wireline operator and pump operator to open well and pump down.
Yeah we just don't use radios within like 30' of the wireline van.
sniperag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I work on offshore vessels. We have UHF repeated network, vhf radios everywhere and many other exciting networks!
Never heard Of a request to shut anything down to accommodate NDT work. Whatever system you implement should Incorporate an easy shutdown be it a well labeled breaker etc. You never know for what reason you will need to shut something down.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.