OP, to give you a mathematical breakdown of the importance of the difference in 0.05% mutual fund fees versus 2% fees take a look at the following two excel captures. The first would be from a S&P Index Fund like VFIAX. It has a 0.05% annual fee. Over 35 years, it will cost you a grand total of $14,605 if you assume that you start with nothing, contribute $18k per year, and only get a return of 7% per year on the funds you had invested at the beginning of the year. Your total profits are $1.85M, and you pay $14k in fees (0.78% of your total returns.) Finally, you end up with $2.47M in your account at retirement.

In the second scenario, you pay someone 2% to manage your money for you. Just for giggles, we assume that they get you the same return as the S&P 500 Index Fund (they don't in real life, as seen in Buffet's bet above). However, in this scenario, over your 35 years of savings, you incur a total of $424k in fees at 2%. This is just shy of 1/3 of your total return. And since these fees have eaten into your returns, you only end up with $1.58M in your account at retirement.
So, like everybody keeps saying. Is it worth $1M and 1/3 of your total retirement returns to mow your own yard?