I agree. I gotta think that having DFW and IAH as major international hubs will be a critical factor, especially since they both service Mexico extensively for folks who want to travel between sites.wangus12 said:
I'd be willing to say that both Houston and Dallas will be host sites
cadetjay02 said:
The problem with Dallas is the turf. I know money will prevail, but every time they try to put down temporary grass in indoor stadiums it's terrible footing. Logically, I don't know how they justify this in the most important tournament in the world.
thisjeffk said:
Close to me.
NRG Stadium is also turf. So is Atlanta and so is New York, etc. The only way we can host a WC in the biggest cities and in their biggest stadiums (outside of SoCal and Miami who are definitely getting matches) is to bring in grass. Hopefully by then they'll have figured out a way to make the pitches safe and high quality.Quote:
The problem with Dallas is the turf. I know money will prevail, but every time they try to put down temporary grass in indoor stadiums it's terrible footing. Logically, I don't know how they justify this in the most important tournament in the world.
That's not true actually. The last few games in Dallas the grass was fine. They don't just lay it down the day before.cadetjay02 said:
The problem with Dallas is the turf. I know money will prevail, but every time they try to put down temporary grass in indoor stadiums it's terrible footing. Logically, I don't know how they justify this in the most important tournament in the world.