I was talking about this with a friend from UF. It seems NIL in the SEC has equalized the conference to a weekly "upset or upsets" as the norm. Add in the 9th game and it becomes increasingly unlikely the SEC gets more than one maybe two 10-2 teams, potentially a couple to a few 9-3 teams with the mean trending to 8-4 for what would once be solid seasons.
Taking A&M out of the equation. With NIL teams like Kentucky, Mississippi State, Missouri, South Carolina, etc. can turn around a season in a year and beat anyone outside of maybe Bama and Georgia on any given weekend. It's not unthinkable that Ole Miss, LSU, and maybe even Texas end up with 4 losses based on the upcoming schedule.
Seems like the SEC is regressing to the mean. A 9th game makes it that much more challenging. I hope this carries weight down the road, if not, I can see a lot of strong 9-3 or 8-4 SEC teams getting jumped by 2 loss programs in the Big 12, ACC, etc. which I don't think is right.
Taking A&M out of the equation. With NIL teams like Kentucky, Mississippi State, Missouri, South Carolina, etc. can turn around a season in a year and beat anyone outside of maybe Bama and Georgia on any given weekend. It's not unthinkable that Ole Miss, LSU, and maybe even Texas end up with 4 losses based on the upcoming schedule.
Seems like the SEC is regressing to the mean. A 9th game makes it that much more challenging. I hope this carries weight down the road, if not, I can see a lot of strong 9-3 or 8-4 SEC teams getting jumped by 2 loss programs in the Big 12, ACC, etc. which I don't think is right.