Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Elko sure sounds like a guy who's about to can his DC

6,754 Views | 36 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by Dex_Mick_Bear
Vinny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe wishful thinking on my part but Bateman should be taking a ton of heat for how this team collapsed at the end of games in the past month of the season.
Batty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How is the Defense this bad? We have a defensive HC, who hand picked his staff and gets to run/execute his defensive scheme and they are bottom 3rd in the SEC in almost every defensive stat. Even with Elko's 4-2-5 which is supposed to excel against the pass, we are 4th worst in the SEC. Getting less for more, WTF.

Before this season I want Adam Fuller from FSU but after the season they had Im not so sure.
pointer74
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No talent is how
Especially on DL and LB
PanzerAggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The portal closes today. With signing day complete and the portal done if Bateman isn't fired this weekend or by Monday then he will, most likely, be back next season. Let's hope Elko is a man of action and not just another BS artist who has mastered the art of Coach Speak.
DimebagsGhost
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Talent and conditioning
Corn Pop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So just to be clear, the university and donors wasted over $100M on replacing an OFF hc with a terrible offense to a DEF hc with a terrible defense. Jokes write themselves.
Dorm 15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He may not have a choice. Since he called the defense out you know "people" are going to expect changes.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
pointer74 said:

No talent is how
Especially on DL and LB


Secondary was our biggest issue.

DL did not live up to there hype and it exposed our secondary.
World's worst proofreader
Rod92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Elko should have stepped in and mandated more blitzing late in the game. Same thing for Auburn. It's on him to sit back and watch all that crap and not do something. Watching pedestrian quarterbacks carve up your secondary because they have an abundance of time and no pressure is ridiculous
woodyhayes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Find a decent secondary coach in the portal.
FCBlitz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He is a Defensive Minded Coach. Our head coach. He should keep his mouth shut unless everyone below him were renegades.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He has to make some changes because it was an epic failure to the end of the season.
andrews372
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If he's so great at calling the defense then just maybe he should stick with calling the defense, instead of handing those duties over to friend that's a retread at best.
JDCAG (NOT Colin)
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
andrews372 said:

If he's so great at calling the defense then just maybe he should stick with calling the defense, instead of handing those duties over to friend that's a retread at best.


A head coach can't be an effective OC or DC, IMO. He needs to hire better across the board.
one safe place
How long do you want to ignore this user?
More than one coach needs to go but the NIL might be being paid to the wrong players as well.
Kozmozag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Elko needs to fire bateman, take over the dc , then hire a head coach to run the team.
90ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
True...and shows we have a major problem next year as DL looked porous vs USC and unknown if new DEs will push for improvement. 50/50 how they will unfold.
IslanderAg04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pointer74 said:

No talent is how
Especially on DL and LB


We have 2 potential first and second rounders on the DL.
Honolulu Blue
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't know how you make the comments he made last night and not fire Bateman. At the same time, I don't know if Elko reasons through his post game comments as well as he should (see post LSU)
Buford T. Justice
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And that is absolutely 100% pathetic. We've lost sight as to what this is all about.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
90ags said:

True...and shows we have a major problem next year as DL looked porous vs USC and unknown if new DEs will push for improvement. 50/50 how they will unfold.


We looked porus because we were very limited on depth. As the game went on we were warn down.

I think Searcy will be good and Howell looked really good. I think we will see Howell on the edge and Searcy in the 5 technique. Regis and Hicks will be inside. Our starters should be very good. The issue will be after that. I think we are good at Edge but a little concerned with the 5 technique after Searcy since 1st and 2nd string will be transfers. DT we will have Evans as Hicks backup so I think we will be ok there but who backups Regis?

Not to mention we probably need a rotation of about 10 players to have significant time on the DL. So depth is my biggest concern. We have numbers at Edge but not 5 and not DT.
World's worst proofreader
APHIS AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The bottom line is that it is not the lack of talent or conditioning, If they were, it would have been obvious throughout the season.

Our collapse was a coaching one. One thing that ALL coaches do is watch film. Then they plan accordingly.

The problem with our coaches is that they do not change or adapt as the season progresses. This is why we "collapse" toward the end of the season.

Opposing coaches know what to expect.

Many years ago, I read an article in which a tt player was being interviewed concerning our game. He was asked how does he and the team prepare to play us and how much film do that watch.

He answered that they do not have to watch any film for they know exactly what to expect in playing us. This was during the Slocum era and by the way, tt beat us in that game.

What was then is still apparently true today.
offenseguru
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nope
offenseguru
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nope
RUGuys4Real
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

90ags said:

True...and shows we have a major problem next year as DL looked porous vs USC and unknown if new DEs will push for improvement. 50/50 how they will unfold.



Quote:

We looked porus because we were very limited on depth. As the game went on we were warn down.

I think Searcy will be good and Howell looked really good. I think we will see Howell on the edge and Searcy in the 5 technique. Regis and Hicks will be inside. Our starters should be very good. The issue will be after that. I think we are good at Edge but a little concerned with the 5 technique after Searcy since 1st and 2nd string will be transfers. DT we will have Evans as Hicks backup so I think we will be ok there but who backups Regis?

Not to mention we probably need a rotation of about 10 players to have significant time on the DL. So depth is my biggest concern. We have numbers at Edge but not 5 and not DT.

vander54, did you play college ball? I'll scan through all this ignorant posting to suddenly come across your post, which is like an oasis in the desert. LOL I was mainly looking for Reed to show some improvement and I think he did. Looks to be calming down and throwing with a little more touch. Long way to go though. Liked seeing Owens! A&M will still be relying on a bunch of portal transfers in 25'. I didn't expect the DL Issues to improve without Nic & Shemar's. I like Elko's recruiting, but I'm not confident that we'll have the depth built up in Elko's 2nd year. Having been there, through that, I know what's going down however in all honesty, I'm not much of a fan of that run back into the middle pile on 3rd & short. Is this something we need to keep trying in order to make us better in the future? Like some day we'll win a Championship on a 4th & short TD, then reflect back on how many times we failed on our way to achieving greatness. LOL
Kramer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was obvious throughout the season if you knew what to look for.

ND started a true freshman at left tackle. No production. Couldn't stop the run.

A very average Bowling Green team ran at will.

LSU went up and down the field at will. No pass rush. No production.

Texas lost their All American LT first drive. Replaced with a RS FR. No production. Couldn't stop the run.
"The only happy Aggie is an unhappy Aggie." Shelby Metcalf
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FCBlitz said:

He is a Defensive Minded Coach. Our head coach. He should keep his mouth shut unless everyone below him were renegades.

I guess you missed the part where he said it was all on him.
SBDavis87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
{Burp}
oh, excuse me.
S.A. Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Vinny said:

Maybe wishful thinking on my part but Bateman should be taking a ton of heat for how this team collapsed at the end of games in the past month of the season.

Isn't Elko the Defensive guru?
AggieArchitect04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's the wrong coordinator to let go.

The best our OC could muster was 4 straight HB dives into a stacked box.

This happened in multiple games this season.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rod92 said:

Elko should have stepped in and mandated more blitzing late in the game. Same thing for Auburn. It's on him to sit back and watch all that crap and not do something. Watching pedestrian quarterbacks carve up your secondary because they have an abundance of time and no pressure is ridiculous
this x 1,000

the best way to stop an opponent's late game drive is with a turnover and/or sacks

having Auburn and USC score in the final seconds (without time for another A&M drive) was coaching malpractice and then some
DrAg14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Delusional
Meanmachine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bateman will be reassigned to Lb coach. Elko will call defense in 25. We will bring in guys that are better scheme fits and be better on defense in year two.
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Meanmachine said:

Bateman will be reassigned to Lb coach. Elko will call defense in 25. We will bring in guys that are better scheme fits and be better on defense in year two.


I hope you are right.
IslanderAg04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DrAg14 said:

Delusional


How am I do delusional?
Scourton and Shemar are both projected to go in the 1st and second round. I dont make up the lists.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.