Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Where's York

6,917 Views | 36 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by ArcheryAg
bdgol07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Have I missed his name being called? Where has he been
gunan01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The same place Scourton is
BCO07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not setting the edge?
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not filling gaps.
curry97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trying to learn how to shed blocks and pursue laterally.
PeekingDuck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
York isn't an SEC linebacker. You shouldn't hear his name too much.
bdgol07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PeekingDuck said:

York isn't an SEC linebacker. You shouldn't hear his name too much.


BGSU isn't in the SEC. He should have 10 tackles tonight
90ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Calling plays and the getting blocked or hitting the wrong gaps. He may know the schemes, but his overmatched athletically.
______________________________________________________ Play for the name on the front of your jersey, not the back...
PeekingDuck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You make a good point.
Agsgirl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looking around for Edgerrin! He made York look better than he was…
brunsie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
York had 5 tackles.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gunan01 said:

The same place Scourton is


Busy checking their bank accounts.
Leander - Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I didn't realized he played the past few weeks
Leander - Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gunan01 said:

The same place Scourton is


Two most overhyped on the team
offenseguru
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I really like the kid but afraid he's just too small for sec lb
Ag_EE_88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He broke up a pass at the end of the game.

The DL rarely puts any real pressure on the QB. We always have to bring extra guys and most of the time we still don't get there in time. Got lucky their QB isn't very accurate.
PeekingDuck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
His speed is a much bigger problem than his size. Combined, uhh…
Haleyscomet50
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dline last year kept offensive line off York. Not so much this year makes it hard on a undersized lb.
Randy Rhodes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So now York sucks?
Gyles Marrett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haleyscomet50 said:

Dline last year kept offensive line off York. Not so much this year makes it hard on an undersized lb.


Make that make sense for me. Our DL should be arguably better than last years group. Not to mention we are more often in 4 man fronts this year instead of 3…so why would Durkins 3 man front have been doing better keeping OL off the LB?
Randy Rhodes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't think this thread supposed to make sense
CommsSchoolLegend96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He is not having the success he did last season. Not having Cooper is having a huge impact on his play.

Still, a good and talented kid. Only a sophomore so he's got time to grow and learn. I believe he can get back to last year's form.
The Banned
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gunan01 said:

The same place Scourton is


Getting held routinely?
PeekingDuck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Randy Rhodes said:

So now York sucks?


He sucked last year too. People were just hanging on to a freshman award and ignoring the man standing next to him. I said the same thing last year. Not sure what people were watching. Anyway, it's quite obvious this year. We need major help at LB, CB, OL, and WR. We have one decent RB after Owens went down and our only good receiver doesn't play anymore for some reason. Neither QB over 60% somehow. I'm honestly not sure how this program got to this point with these resources. Pretty amazing.
BraxtonW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PeekingDuck said:

Randy Rhodes said:

So now York sucks?


He sucked last year too. People were just hanging on to a freshman award and ignoring the man standing next to him. I said the same thing last year. Not sure what people were watching. Anyway, it's quite obvious this year. We need major help at LB, CB, OL, and WR. We have one decent RB after Owens went down and our only good receiver doesn't play anymore for some reason. Neither QB over 60% somehow. I'm honestly not sure how this program got to this point with these resources. Pretty amazing.

This is just wrong
90ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frankly, while sucks is a bit harsh, this is the true observation from last year that many either overlook or don't look at the games in detail. There were so many times last year where he was in the wrong place or easily blocked or too slow to cover. Coop's play helped cover this up in so many ways.

Great kid, smart kid, understands all of it, but he's not our top LB (really not even 1st team IMO other than having the football IQ). It is what it is and why LB needs upgrading (do think DeShields and Scooby have potential to get thur this year, but really hoping Jernigan and Lockhart can improve the position after some extensive SEC playing experience).

______________________________________________________ Play for the name on the front of your jersey, not the back...
Digital_Java
How long do you want to ignore this user?
York will be a head coach one day, but unfortunately that will not win us football games right now. He is the single biggest problem with entire Defense IMO.

He makes all the calls and lines up players, but opposing offenses routinely run their schemes directly at him and the rest of our secondary tries to cover up for him which then exposes them on the backend.

Last year an All-America LB allowed us to play around his continued inability to shed blocks and getting completely mauled out of the play.

He's down from 3 tackles per game to 2 per game.

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/taurean-york-1.html
Digital_Java
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Elko is supposed to be analytical, but he continues to coach like a career coordinator and unable to look at facts objectively and fix the problem with potentially unpopular player decisions.

There are multiple ways to cover up for York's skill gap and playing "only" 2 LBs in most sets is not how to fix this. Get on the f'ing phone with Slocum and review a decade worth of film on how to stop the spread offense w/3 LBs on the field.
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
i think some of it could be schematic. durkin finally realized last year how best to utilize the talent he had and didn't have by blitzing jv the **** out of teams. this helped cover up our inadequacies in the secondary to a degree. it also changed a lot about how york was asked to play. he cleaned up the trash that didn't get sacked but was altered. i don't see elko blitz nearly as much as durkin did over the last 9-10 games last year. so it changes what is being asked of york in some ways which may be exposing his more limited physical traits. he is still a good player but maybe not the next coming of dat nguyen.
NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But ElKo Is a DeFeNsIvE gEnIOus!
Justice Beaver
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Randy Rhodes said:

So now York sucks?




Always has
83Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Randy Rhodes said:

So now York sucks?
But he's great at taunting Florida QBs
Aggie Dad 26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For those that like dealing with facts

Aggie Dad 26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And Florida

vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I haven't paid a ton of close attention to the LB but York is our leading tackler.

I've seen more issues with Scooby than York
World's worst proofreader
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.