Title says it all. With Elko I expected fewer starters on the defensive end to leave. Any chance big Walt stays?
JohnLA762 said:
This is the new normal. They are just going through contract negotiations. If we want to keep them, we gotta pay more than the other offers.
This game sucks ass now.
rootube said:JohnLA762 said:
This is the new normal. They are just going through contract negotiations. If we want to keep them, we gotta pay more than the other offers.
This game sucks ass now.
It's funny that Jimbo just fleeced us for $75M and we are blaming players for demanding their fair market value as ruining the game.
OriolePete said:
The real question is, do you want them back?
I understand there are places A&M is in desperate need of talent or depth. But get it somewhere else. Get it from guys who WANT to be here or at the very least, bring in kids who weren't a part of whatever was wrong with what culture. I'm not saying the kids in the portal are to blame, but at some point you have to put 2 and 2 together. Especially with the out of state kids. I have had a pretty rigid stance on this over the last 2 weeks. I think Sark has the right idea that once a kid is in the portal, good luck. But upon thinking further, if I was the Head Coach, I would NOT have that stance in year 1, as these kids just lost their HC. But, before the first portal opens in year 2, I make it clear that you are here and we are all in this together and we do want to do everything we can to make you happy here. That even includes bumps in NIL where needed...BUT there won't be any negotiations or bidding when you hit the portal. You have given your spot up, and from the second you hit the portal, we can begin replacing you however our roster dictates.
To do this any other way is splitting your staff too many ways. It makes about as much sense if an NFL team said they weren't going to sign any free agents until after the draft.
The real difference is the level of talent that is leaving TAMU, many more starters from TAMU entering the portal than other universities. I understand you want to feel better about the exodus, but portal coupled with the dropping commitments is tough.redjalapeno-87 said:
As of today, Texas A&M currently has 13 scholarship portalees. Other notable teams with 13 scholarship portalees (Mass Exodus) or more that I ran across.
Michigan State 20 (coaching change)
South Carolina 17
Ohio State 15
Georgia 14
Kentucky 13
Arkansas 13
The only departure that has had their play justify significant money demands is Walk. If any of the others did I hope Elko laughed them out of the facility.OilFieldIRI said:
some asked for NFL type money to stay.
some have been visiting numerous schools across the country.
rootube said:JohnLA762 said:
This is the new normal. They are just going through contract negotiations. If we want to keep them, we gotta pay more than the other offers.
This game sucks ass now.
It's funny that Jimbo just fleeced us for $75M and we are blaming players for demanding their fair market value as ruining the game.
RossWag said:The real difference is the level of talent that is leaving TAMU, many more starters from TAMU entering the portal than other universities. I understand you want to feel better about the exodus, but portal coupled with the dropping commitments is tough.redjalapeno-87 said:
As of today, Texas A&M currently has 13 scholarship portalees. Other notable teams with 13 scholarship portalees (Mass Exodus) or more that I ran across.
Michigan State 20 (coaching change)
South Carolina 17
Ohio State 15
Georgia 14
Kentucky 13
Arkansas 13
We will get through this and will have thoroughly committed players, which will likely mean a more cohesive team.
I don't see the humor in ANY of it. Capitalism at its worst and I'm pro Capitalist.rootube said:JohnLA762 said:
This is the new normal. They are just going through contract negotiations. If we want to keep them, we gotta pay more than the other offers.
This game sucks ass now.
It's funny that Jimbo just fleeced us for $75M and we are blaming players for demanding their fair market value as ruining the game.
Maybe we've learned a lesson.rootube said:JohnLA762 said:
This is the new normal. They are just going through contract negotiations. If we want to keep them, we gotta pay more than the other offers.
This game sucks ass now.
It's funny that Jimbo just fleeced us for $75M and we are blaming players for demanding their fair market value as ruining the game.
So, is fair market value that one HS OT is demanding $750,000 to sign with a college team? At that rate it will cost us several mil just to field and OL. That ok, Mr. Capitallist? That's throwing Jimbo money at players that may never work out.Aggie2 said:Maybe we've learned a lesson.rootube said:JohnLA762 said:
This is the new normal. They are just going through contract negotiations. If we want to keep them, we gotta pay more than the other offers.
This game sucks ass now.
It's funny that Jimbo just fleeced us for $75M and we are blaming players for demanding their fair market value as ruining the game.
I'll call you on that. Most of the Georgia and OSU portal guys were not starters. Lots of potential, but not starting. Until you prove yourself on the field, it's speculative. Likely reason they are not starting.redjalapeno-87 said:RossWag said:The real difference is the level of talent that is leaving TAMU, many more starters from TAMU entering the portal than other universities. I understand you want to feel better about the exodus, but portal coupled with the dropping commitments is tough.redjalapeno-87 said:
As of today, Texas A&M currently has 13 scholarship portalees. Other notable teams with 13 scholarship portalees (Mass Exodus) or more that I ran across.
Michigan State 20 (coaching change)
South Carolina 17
Ohio State 15
Georgia 14
Kentucky 13
Arkansas 13
We will get through this and will have thoroughly committed players, which will likely mean a more cohesive team.
Ohio State and Georgia have more talent leaving than Texas A&M, without coaching changes.
Enzomatic said:rootube said:JohnLA762 said:
This is the new normal. They are just going through contract negotiations. If we want to keep them, we gotta pay more than the other offers.
This game sucks ass now.
It's funny that Jimbo just fleeced us for $75M and we are blaming players for demanding their fair market value as ruining the game.
Biggest issue is contract negotiations now being done yearly for all current and prospective players. That's what's draining and what is making fanbases jaded and frustrated now. This game is played every damn year for every "student" athlete if they decide they "deserve" it. Eventually this game will piss off everyone involved.
If you want to make a more direct comparison to what you described, then every player should sign a contract for a certain length of time that's for more than a year (and they have to actually play all the damn games for seasons they're signed for, including bowl games), then include a buyout (paid by the new team maybe?) if they decide to leave, but also one if we decide to fire them. And penalties for not doing your job by playing in games. No other job can you get paid, and then decide to not show up whenever you want to without ramifications. You want to be treated like an adult, then you better follow through and actually be one.
1. I think both are ruining the game, it isn't one or the other.rootube said:JohnLA762 said:
This is the new normal. They are just going through contract negotiations. If we want to keep them, we gotta pay more than the other offers.
This game sucks ass now.
It's funny that Jimbo just fleeced us for $75M and we are blaming players for demanding their fair market value as ruining the game.
I want Nolen and Diggs back.OriolePete said:
The real question is, do you want them back?
I understand there are places A&M is in desperate need of talent or depth. But get it somewhere else. Get it from guys who WANT to be here or at the very least, bring in kids who weren't a part of whatever was wrong with what culture. I'm not saying the kids in the portal are to blame, but at some point you have to put 2 and 2 together. Especially with the out of state kids. I have had a pretty rigid stance on this over the last 2 weeks. I think Sark has the right idea that once a kid is in the portal, good luck. But upon thinking further, if I was the Head Coach, I would NOT have that stance in year 1, as these kids just lost their HC. But, before the first portal opens in year 2, I make it clear that you are here and we are all in this together and we do want to do everything we can to make you happy here. That even includes bumps in NIL where needed...BUT there won't be any negotiations or bidding when you hit the portal. You have given your spot up, and from the second you hit the portal, we can begin replacing you however our roster dictates.
To do this any other way is splitting your staff too many ways. It makes about as much sense if an NFL team said they weren't going to sign any free agents until after the draft.
@John, I don't understand your point of view.JohnLA762 said:
This is the new normal. They are just going through contract negotiations. If we want to keep them, we gotta pay more than the other offers.
This game sucks ass now.
Quote:
We are losing starters Nolen, Diggs, Chappell, Bisontis, Jake Johnson, Harmon...I won't count Max Johnson as he was likely gone without a coaching change.
Well, we fleeced ourselves for $75M and did so willingly when we did his contract. And both can be true.rootube said:JohnLA762 said:
This is the new normal. They are just going through contract negotiations. If we want to keep them, we gotta pay more than the other offers.
This game sucks ass now.
It's funny that Jimbo just fleeced us for $75M and we are blaming players for demanding their fair market value as ruining the game.
But it is ruining the game. We will have vastly overpaid 5-stars underperforming on the football field now instead of focusing on improving their game for the NFL draft.rootube said:JohnLA762 said:
This is the new normal. They are just going through contract negotiations. If we want to keep them, we gotta pay more than the other offers.
This game sucks ass now.
It's funny that Jimbo just fleeced us for $75M and we are blaming players for demanding their fair market value as ruining the game.
Market value is whatever the 2 parties agree to. It is determined in a free market. There is no cap in NIL game.one safe place said:rootube said:
Well, we fleeced ourselves for $75M and did so willingly when we did his contract. And both can be true.
Is there a list of the fair market value for every player?