Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

2012 SEC West Champs???

4,117 Views | 17 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by StinkyPinky
AggieBlu
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:28p, 6/23/23
https://aggieswire.usatoday.com/2023/06/23/texas-aggies-football-lsu-probation-penalties-ncaa-report/?fbclid=IwAR1miaSj0Et_yb62LVMd5ldfqm2RIZ8aKVwqq2nOfY-2gZ-ViMCRztTG9FY
I will never understand how someone can tell so many lies and not feel bad about it...
Reply Quote
1 edit
#Mke
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:45p, 6/23/23
Pretty sure Alabama won the division outright in 2012.

Even if you remove the loss to LSU, we would then be 6-1 vs SEC. Alabama went 7-1 vs SEC.

On the flip side, with LSU erased, we would be 5-0 vs SEC West, Alabama 5-1 vs SEC West.

Not exactly sure how it would be decided.



Rest in Peace Coach Price, may the Lord Jesus Christ welcome you into His Kingdom!
Reply Quote
Reno Hightower
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:14p, 6/23/23
It

Just

Doesn't

Matter

It just

Doesn't

Matter

It just doesn't

Matter

It just doesn't matter

It just doesn't matter

It just doesn't matter

It just doesn't matter

It just doesn't matter

It just doesn't matter

It just doesn't matter

It just doesn't matter

It just doesn't matter

It just doesn't matter

It just doesn't matter
Reply Quote
S.A. Aggie
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to #Mke • 10:43p, 6/23/23
#Mke said:
Pretty sure Alabama won the division outright in 2012.

Even if you remove the loss to LSU, we would then be 6-1 vs SEC. Alabama went 7-1 vs SEC.

On the flip side, with LSU erased, we would be 5-0 vs SEC West, Alabama 5-1 vs SEC West.

Not exactly sure how it would be decided.
!

We would still have two losses.

F = Forfeit A forfeit changes a school's original win or tie into a loss and its opponent's original loss or tie into a win.
V = Vacated A vacated game is expunged from a school's record, although its opponent's record is not changed.

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/friv/forfeits.html

Reply Quote
4
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:40p, 6/24/23
The people wanting to claim this are the same people bragging about our 1939 NC.

It's silly.
Reply Quote
OldShadeOfBlue
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 4 • 1:58p, 6/24/23
4 said:
The people wanting to claim this are the same people bragging about our 1939 NC.

It's silly.
Noo, we actually won the 1939 championship

It would be more like horns claiming Vince won the 2005 Heisman
OSOB
Reply Quote
Angry Beaver
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to #Mke • 2:23p, 6/24/23
#Mke said:
Pretty sure Alabama won the division outright in 2012.

Even if you remove the loss to LSU, we would then be 6-1 vs SEC. Alabama went 7-1 vs SEC.

On the flip side, with LSU erased, we would be 5-0 vs SEC West, Alabama 5-1 vs SEC West.

Not exactly sure how it would be decided.


Texas A&M went 5-0 in the West.
Alabama went 4-1 in the West.

Texas A&M would've won the division.
Reply Quote
4
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to OldShadeOfBlue • 3:03p, 6/24/23
OldShadeOfBlue said:
4 said:
The people wanting to claim this are the same people bragging about our 1939 NC.

It's silly.
Noo, we actually won the 1939 championship

It would be more like horns claiming Vince won the 2005 Heisman

Reply Quote
TexAggie1999
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 4 • 10:28p, 6/24/23
4 said:
The people wanting to claim this are the same people bragging about our 1939 NC.

It's silly.


No, the 1939 Championship is real. It is like those claiming the other 2 bogus Championships before 1939 which are complete jokes.
Reply Quote
MCAg09
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Angry Beaver • 10:32p, 6/24/23
Angry Beaver said:
#Mke said:
Pretty sure Alabama won the division outright in 2012.

Even if you remove the loss to LSU, we would then be 6-1 vs SEC. Alabama went 7-1 vs SEC.

On the flip side, with LSU erased, we would be 5-0 vs SEC West, Alabama 5-1 vs SEC West.

Not exactly sure how it would be decided.


Texas A&M went 5-0 in the West.
Alabama went 4-1 in the West.

Texas A&M would've won the division.
That's not how that works...
Reply Quote
the_batman26
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AggieBlu • 10:46p, 6/24/23
I think it's a meme article. But it's not shocking considering the corruption in that state.
Reply Quote
DGrimesAg92
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:22p, 6/24/23
If they put this on the wall, I'm "really" done this time.
Reply Quote
H0RNbyBIRTH
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DGrimesAg92 • 12:59p, 6/25/23
DGrimesAg92 said:
If they put this on the wall, I'm "really" done this time.
Is A&M the only school that lists a division winner on stadium wall?
Reply Quote
#Mke
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to H0RNbyBIRTH • 2:56p, 6/25/23
Nattie said:
DGrimesAg92 said:
If they put this on the wall, I'm "really" done this time.
Is A&M the only school that lists a division winner on stadium wall?
The wall that you may be referring to hasn't been at Kyle Field since at least 2014 maybe even longer
Reply Quote
Justwinags
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:28p, 6/25/23
Was that a reference to the Meatballs chant? If so, nice!
Reply Quote
W
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:20a, 6/26/23
you know it's crazy....

but the Sumlin era has now had 6 of its losses vacated by either LSU or Ole Miss

small feather in the cap of the folks that were hesitant to join the SEC. The league was dirty. The league is dirty.

and it's very tough -- perhaps impossible -- to compete by doing things the right way
Reply Quote
WC94
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TexAggie1999 • 6:19a, 6/26/23
TexAggie1999 said:
4 said:
The people wanting to claim this are the same people bragging about our 1939 NC.

It's silly.



No, the 1939 Championship is real. It is like those claiming the other 2 bogus Championships before 1939 which are complete jokes.


I'd give us the 1919 Chip, undefeated with 10 straight shut outs is a salty ass D! The other one we had a tie, so no thanks.
Reply Quote
StinkyPinky
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to WC94 • 5:36p, 6/26/23
WC94 said:
TexAggie1999 said:
4 said:
The people wanting to claim this are the same people bragging about our 1939 NC.

It's silly.



No, the 1939 Championship is real. It is like those claiming the other 2 bogus Championships before 1939 which are complete jokes.


I'd give us the 1919 Chip, undefeated with 10 straight shut outs is a salty ass D! The other one we had a tie, so no thanks.


Different game.
But, yes
Reply Quote
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.