eternaloblivion said:
Does anyone know if "Smoke" is that AU linebacker's given name or did he change his name to that?
Having a hard time understanding why a parent would name their kid Smoke.
Smoke Monday sounds kinda iffy
I know totally rando but just curious
EKG1996 said:
His name is: Quindarious
"Tank" Bigsby's given name is Cartavious
TyperWoods said:eternaloblivion said:
Does anyone know if "Smoke" is that AU linebacker's given name or did he change his name to that?
Having a hard time understanding why a parent would name their kid Smoke.
Smoke Monday sounds kinda iffy
I know totally rando but just curious
Quindarius is its birth name. It identifies as smoke, and in today's culture, who am I to argue?
Are they Roman gladiators?Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:EKG1996 said:
His name is: Quindarious
"Tank" Bigsby's given name is Cartavious
Are they related?
That was not targeting. Calzada was a runner so not defenseless and he was hit with the side of the defender's helmet. And you can argue that it was Calzada who initiated the helmet-to-helmet hit.farwellrob said:
Whatever his name, it was targeting against Calzada.
Monday should be sitting out next Saturday.
Just who's side are you on?RealTalk said:That was not targeting. Calzada was a runner so not defenseless and he was hit with the side of the defender's helmet. And you can argue that it was Calzada who initiated the helmet-to-helmet hit.farwellrob said:
Whatever his name, it was targeting against Calzada.
Monday should be sitting out next Saturday.
No way I'm letting anyone call me anything else if I had either one of those names (the real ones).EKG1996 said:
His name is: Quindarious
"Tank" Bigsby's given name is Cartavious
RealTalk said:That was not targeting. Calzada was a runner so not defenseless and he was hit with the side of the defender's helmet. And you can argue that it was Calzada who initiated the helmet-to-helmet hit.farwellrob said:
Whatever his name, it was targeting against Calzada.
Monday should be sitting out next Saturday.
Calzada wasn't hit with the crown of the helmet so not sure what you're blathering about.TyperWoods said:RealTalk said:That was not targeting. Calzada was a runner so not defenseless and he was hit with the side of the defender's helmet. And you can argue that it was Calzada who initiated the helmet-to-helmet hit.farwellrob said:
Whatever his name, it was targeting against Calzada.
Monday should be sitting out next Saturday.
Hit with the top of his helmet. It's supposed to be about safety for the guy making the hit. Right? Isn't that what the blathering idiots always say?
Anyway, I hope he plays well, we need him against Bama( where he would be called for targeting on that hit)
