is telling about our defense. "The looks are nothing really that special. Their personnel is. "

Seems like the same could be said about our offense.

Our personnel on offense is not currently special. It is only at rb

And he's right about the defense. When you have talent and depth that good there's no reason to be super exotic.

Captain Awesome said:

---

is telling about our defense. "The looks are nothing really that special. Their personnel is. "

Seems like the same could be said about our offense.

---

So, not the Xs and Os but the Jimmies and Joes?

Bunk Moreland said:

---

And he's right about the defense. When you have talent and depth that good there's no reason to be super exotic.

---

Our "talent" gave up big play after big play last week because of the scheme.

aggiehawg said:

---

Captain Awesome said:

---

is telling about our defense. "The looks are nothing really that special. Their personnel is. "

Seems like the same could be said about our offense.

---

So, not the Xs and Os but the Jimmies and Joes?

---

My thought is, why can't we have both?

Captain Awesome said:

---

Bunk Moreland said:

---

And he's right about the defense. When you have talent and depth that good there's no reason to be super exotic.

---

Our "talent" gave up big play after big play last week because of the scheme.

---

You mean 3 big plays?

D just needs to get off to better starts.

You start slow again, D needs to realize that is probably ballgame. D has to start games assuming they need to hold opponents to under 13 if they want a chance to win.

Bunk Moreland said:

---

Captain Awesome said:

---

Bunk Moreland said:

---

And he's right about the defense. When you have talent and depth that good there's no reason to be super exotic.

---

Our "talent" gave up big play after big play last week because of the scheme.

---

You mean 3 big plays?

---

We watched very different games.
I mean, our inability to tackle.
our inability to cover WRs
our inability to set the edge. (I've never watched us get outrun on stretch plays more in a game.)
Good thing their starting QB and WR wasn't healthy in the second half. (It could have been worse)

By the way they had an 8 play and an 11 play drive in the first half.

aggiehawg said:

---

Captain Awesome said:

---

is telling about our defense. "The looks are nothing really that special. Their personnel is. "

Seems like the same could be said about our offense.

---

So, not the Xs and Os but the Jimmies and Joes?

---

If I hear this one more time good lord help us all I will turn this world into a burning landscape of pain and fury. We're 5 weeks into the season and I've heard that line more than I heard A&M nay-sayers use the term, "Body of Work," last year.

I am sure we start out slow. Why expect anything different with this group. Our game plans are generally nonexistent.

In the first half you are correct

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Bunk Moreland said:
And he's right about the defense. When you have talent and depth that good there's no reason to be super exotic.

---

Our "talent" gave up big play after big play last week because of the scheme.

---

No we didn't. Nothing beyond the first quarter.

Captain Awesome said:

---

Bunk Moreland said:

---

Captain Awesome said:

---

Bunk Moreland said:

---

And he's right about the defense. When you have talent and depth that good there's no reason to be super exotic.

---

Our "talent" gave up big play after big play last week because of the scheme.

---

You mean 3 big plays?

---

We watched very different games.
I mean, our inability to tackle.
our inability to cover WRs
our inability to set the edge. (I've never watched us get outrun on stretch plays more in a game.)
Good thing their starting QB and WR wasn't healthy in the second half. (It could have been worse)

By the way they had an 8 play and an 11 play drive in the first half.

---

0 points surrendered for almost 3 full quarters. The big pass play was just a great play by the receiver, it happens and it sucks. Run gap control has been an issue all year long and that's not scheme, it's on the players and every analyst and coach has said as much.

So yep, it's the Jimmies n' Joes. The scheme is solid enough. When executed properly.

Yep, they did have that one drive. Go rewatch the second have and tell me how many 11 play 80 yards drives they had- and while your at come back and tell how many pints they had, how many total yards, etc. they had in that half.

TXAGBQ76 said:

---

Yep, they did have that one drive. Go rewatch the second have and tell me how many 11 play 80 yards drives they had- and while your at come back and tell how many pints they had, how many total yards, etc. they had in that half.

---

Which QB did you see play in the second half? They lost their 2 best players on offense for the 2nd half. Of course we looked strong.

Captain Awesome said:

---

TXAGBQ76 said:

---

Yep, they did have that one drive. Go rewatch the second have and tell me how many 11 play 80 yards drives they had- and while your at come back and tell how many pints they had, how many total yards, etc. they had in that half.

---

Which QB did you see play in the second half? They lost their 2 best players on offense for the 2nd half. Of course we looked strong.

---

It's weird how when they lost their qb and wr there offense was less effective . I wonder what their offense would have looked like if they were missing them the whole game? Maybe throw in a couple offensive lineman as well?

My point is of course that impacted their offense why do people not think the same would apply to us under even worse circumstances.