I'm guessing that schools are seeing that athletes in the SEC are inherently more marketable, and subsequently able to demand more cash from the SEC than they could the Big 12. This puts schools like Texas and OU at more of a disadvantage than they already were when trying to recruit into a crappy conference.
So in addition to wrecking whatever was left of collegiate amateurism in college football, I believe the NIL policy is also hastening NCAA football into leveling out all schools and giving each athlete the same ability to get paid. Having different conferences of varying stature impedes this. Short term it puts lesser conferences at a disadvantage. Long term, it's less money for the NCAA as a whole.
And it's not good for collegiate athletics.
So in addition to wrecking whatever was left of collegiate amateurism in college football, I believe the NIL policy is also hastening NCAA football into leveling out all schools and giving each athlete the same ability to get paid. Having different conferences of varying stature impedes this. Short term it puts lesser conferences at a disadvantage. Long term, it's less money for the NCAA as a whole.
And it's not good for collegiate athletics.