I'm being challenged by my boss...didn't Texas A&M make a Playboy top 10 or top 5 list in the last few years for having hot women? Can anyone direct me to a link?

Let me see if I can remember.......

I wouldn't know. I only read it for the pictures

What pictures?

Does your boss really need to see a name on a list to know that a public university with >40,000 in enrollment is going to have plenty of hot women?

^
and this is what I wish everyone would realize. There is talent in numbers.

Tell your boss to take a stroll across west campus

One look at the listeater and he'll be convinced

If you think A&M is in the top 10, you obviously haven't been to many other campuses.

quote:

---

Tell your boss to take a stroll across west campus

---

I second that!

As a current student, I can tell you from firsthand experience and after going to lots of other college campuses, that while we do in fact have a lot of good looking girls, we don't have as many "Holy **** you are ****ing hot" girls.

quote:

---

Does your boss really need to see a name on a list to know that a public university with >40,000 in enrollment is going to have plenty of hot women

---

unless you're talking eight 5,000 student campuses in the Boston area....

You know it bro!

Just go to WCL, you'll find some. Zachry, not so much.

In terms of percentage of hot tail per capita, I haven't seen anyone who beats Clemson. No, not even the diseased Tceh women.

Aggie girls could help themselves out by trying a little harder on gameday.

Ole Miss is talented. I'm back in school at UNT, and it doesn't hold a candle to A&M. UNT has 35k students.

hate to say it but we don't hold a candle to most other schools....

ole miss
florida
georgia
usc
arizona state

these will be the top five in whatever order you wish to put them in until further notice. that is all.

Add Auburn to that list

damn. the sec is good at everything

quote:

---

hate to say it but we don't hold a candle to most other schools....

---

Yes we do. Apparently it hasn't always been that way, but since I've been associated with TAMU (2003 onward), we have been comparable to most places I've been. And I've been to many, many college towns.

aggiesouth...is that you big ben??

Do you think the hot girls at those schools in any way aid in recruiting???

quote:

---

and this is what I wish everyone would realize. There is talent in numbers.

---

Indeed, quantity carries a quality all its own.

Ole Miss is definately in the top 5 no matter who the other 4 schools you choose! Been to several games and such down there and I always enjoyed the eye candy !! We always enjoyed the BBQ contest that Oxford had for a couple years just for that reason- BEER,BBQ,BABES!!!

SEC has mucho talent but their presentation is what puts them over the top. (Makeup at all times, heels, sundresses, jewelry, tannedness, etc.) They are very well trained.

A&M is easily a top 10 and has a very solid reputation around the country. It would be even better but many of the girls are too modest and come from too good of homes to ever flaunt themselves or play themselves up too much. Also some level of tomboy syndrome, which masks the overall fineness asset base a little.

Whoever said USC better be talking about the gamecocks, because the trojan campus is a MAJOR letdown if you are looking for fine ladies. Minus a handful of song girls, of course.

[This message has been edited by TennAg (edited 5/23/2010 5:40p).]

I'd put our crop in the top ten. It's all pretty arbitrary. Here are some of the bigger schools I've visited that are significantly short on talent:

Wisconsin
Houston
SoCal (surprisingly)
Illinois
Notre Dame
Georgia Tech
Northwestern

Of course I evaluate based on younger eyes from younger days. I'm sure my standards would be different now, as would the gene pool in those locations.

Sorry boys, but if you look at the hottest campus lists, most of them have LOW academic standards. See TSU & ASU. Hotties are not always the smart ones.

MKTG Majors

Yes, high correlation between intelligence and pastiness. Especially true of any school north of Kentucky.

Notre Dame? Are you serious?

I went back in 2000 and would compare it to going to Fry's on Saturday ... the couple of good ones stand out from all the dudes and ones you arent sure are even women.

quote:

---

Here are some of the bigger schools I've visited that are significantly short on talent:

---

quote:

---

Georgia Tech

---

It's 72% male, and primarily known as an engineering school, so go figure.

[This message has been edited by Who is John Galt? (edited 5/23/2010 10:03p).]

Arizona State and Ole Miss are 1 and 2.......

~ Trust Me, I'm A Doctor ~

I agree with Tennag about the Gamecocks. My wife and I fly to Columbia 2-3 times a year to watch her son and the girls are extremely, well, they are nice. In the SEC they rank right there with Ole Miss and Auburn.

The first game we are going to this year is the Georgia-Carolina game in early Sept (same date as our LaTech game) so if I dont forget, I'll report back. But I am telling you, Carolina girls are good.

"Get your licks in while you can..."

[This message has been edited by monarch (edited 5/24/2010 1:05p).]