Why is Nike our sponsor for track and field instead of adidas? Is there a different contract or some exclusive deal through the NCAA?

quote:
As I recall, Pat Henry preferred Nike for track and so was allowed to keep them as a supplier instead of Adidas.
quote:
if football can make the push that basketball, track, and baseball have made Nike will beg us to come back.
quote:
I don't think Adidas makes great track shoes so we have a side deal with Nike in track.
quote:
...
Track and cross-country will remain with Nike because of a strict contract that Head Coach Pat Henry has with the company. It is an unusual arrangement, because apparel providers usually have comprehensive contracts with schools.
"adidas has a great product and is gaining a lot of steam, but I think that Nike is very prestigious and has been powerful for some time," said sophomore Zuheir Sharif , a jumper on the track team. "I'm sure the quality between the two is comparable, but I also think that Nike makes better equipment for track."
Both companies have traditionally specialized in different sports. Nike has gained major popularity as a basketball, football and running equipment provider. Adidas, a German company, grew in Europe by focusing on soccer, golf and fashion.
"Coach Henry has that agreement with Nike, and in my opinion they make better shoes for running and track," said sophomore Trinity Otto, a track team member. "The shoes have better support and the air pockets make them more comfortable. adidas isn't bad. Maybe it's better that they use different brands for different sports."
...