SS culpability

3,980 Views | 21 Replies | Last: 4 mo ago by Windy City Ag
YokelRidesAgain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Although "political", posting here rather than F16 in the hopes of better discussion.

The AfD (Alternative for Germany) party was recently expelled from the Identify and Democracy group (a coalition of right-wing, Eurosceptic parties) in the European Union Parliament, due to recent statements made by one of their EU Parliament members, Maximillian Krah.

Should be noted that Krah appears to be a real jerk. He has congratulated China for occupying Tibet for the past 70 years, employed a Chinese spy, and there are credible reports of his name on Russian payrolls.

What got his party expelled from a right-wing alliance, however, were statements in an interview with an Italian newspaper in which he stated, "I would never say that anyone who wore an SS uniform was automatically a criminal" and, "Among the 900,000 SS, there were also many peasants: there was certainly a high percentage of criminals, but not only that."

On their face, Krah's statements appear factually correct. Particularly among the Waffen-SS units, by the end of the war a number of units were functioning in parallel to the regular army as soldiers. To be sure, many SS units serving in a military role committed unspeakable war crimes. At the end of the day, however, Himmler was a power seeking troll and brought enormous resources under his direct control, including a significant percentage of the army.

It seem ridiculous to suggest that any German who got drafted into this scheme was complicit in crimes against humanity.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
USAFAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's pretty hard to argue the verdict the world and history has placed the the SS, whether they be Waffen or Algemeine. Guilt by association may not be fair, and combat is a terrible thing (especially on the Russian Front), but the crimes of the SS were so pervasive, common and on such a scale no matter where they went, that it would be hard to say, "it was just the criminal element who did bad things".

It isn't a winning political strategy to be a Nazi or SS apologist <shrug>.

12thFan/Websider Since 2003
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Multiple Waffen-SS units were associated with war crimes. I can think of at least one that ran a concentration camp. There were no clean SS units. Those were the true believers, though there were also conscripts amongst them, for whom on an individual case it may get more complicated.
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I had two students this year from Germany and I asked why they immigrated.

"Foreigners have ruined everything."

They said that the group that tends to support the guy in question come from the east. The students are from the more Catholic, Conservative south and their family couldn't stand it anymore. I hoped that the rest of the class heard what they said.
USAFAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

I had two students this year from Germany and I asked why they immigrated.

"Foreigners have ruined everything."

They said that the group that tends to support the guy in question come from the east. The students are from the more Catholic, Conservative south and their family couldn't stand it anymore. I hoped that the rest of the class heard what they said.
Yes, it seems the East Germans never wholly took on the collective guilt that the West Germans did for events in leading up to and during WWII.

12thFan/Websider Since 2003
YokelRidesAgain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

I had two students this year from Germany and I asked why they immigrated.

"Foreigners have ruined everything."

They said that the group that tends to support the guy in question come from the east. The students are from the more Catholic, Conservative south and their family couldn't stand it anymore. I hoped that the rest of the class heard what they said.
Could you elaborate on the perceived distinction? I am fascinated by German politics, but the various distinctions are so complex that I could easily be missing the plot as those involved perceive it.

AfD started out as a Eurosceptic and fiscally conservative party, and gradually "migrated" to opposing most immigration as well. As it gained "pariah cow" status in German politics (none of the major parties will collaborate with it, on grounds of it acting like a bunch of Nazis), many of its respectable members have resigned, and certain sectors of the party like the youth wing are increasingly resembling, well, a bunch of Nazis.

Nonetheless, "foreigners have ruined everything" is a reasonable summary of AfD's position. Curious as to how your Bavarian students perceive the difference.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
YokelRidesAgain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It should also be noted that "far-right" and "far-left" politics are both significantly more popular in the former East German states as opposed to Germany as a whole.

Interestingly, there has been a recent split amongst the far-left between urban, academic elite, woke types and a new left wing-populist movement focused on economic conditions for the locals.

One wonders at the potential for a future alliance between ardent socialists and ardent racists. Have we seen that before? Did it end well?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To get into the SS initially the standards were exceptionally difficult for the day. Hard to prove/claim 'all' of the members were actual war criminals. Initially it was based on stuff like the knights Templar etc. Members at one point or another had to prove their pseudoscientific at best 'aryan race' lineage to 1750 or 1800. Of course, after 1933 it became…much more disgusting etc. It's funny/sad what parts of the political world have embraced parts of their legacy:



Historically speaking, it is fascinating how it was formed, and evolved into the monstrosity it became known for. The actions taken against what we might consider 'right wing' politics in Germany today are pretty disgusting, imho, but it's a slur to accuse them of such silliness/evil as though they are somehow supportive of what the SS became. This is just using a legacy of nazi censorship in Germany to go after a political foe on the rise today. Immigrant crime and crime generally are a huge problem there now.

German politics are fascinating. I love that they have a 'pirate' party, and that their legacy parties are panicked about the shifting winds.
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not so sure. We talked about it but didn't get too far into it.
Smeghead4761
How long do you want to ignore this user?
USA*** said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

I had two students this year from Germany and I asked why they immigrated.

"Foreigners have ruined everything."

They said that the group that tends to support the guy in question come from the east. The students are from the more Catholic, Conservative south and their family couldn't stand it anymore. I hoped that the rest of the class heard what they said.
Yes, it seems the East Germans never wholly took on the collective guilt that the West Germans did for events in leading up to and during WWII.
The East Germans never went into the collective guilt for Nazi crimes at all. The Party line was built on the theory that Fascism (and I find it very interesting that they use the term Fascism rather than Nazism) was an inevitable result of capitalism. As Socialists, so the Party line went, they were Anti-Fascists*, and had overthrown the Fascism and moved beyond it. The Communist-led** prisoner uprising at Buchenwald (which occurred after almost all of the SS guards had fled to escape the advancing American Third Army) was a major piece in their national origin narrative.

* The Soviet-sponsored Communists states of Eastern Europe were using the term "Anti-Fascist" decades before todays black-hoodie clad Sturmabteilung of the American Left.

** The Communists occupied leadership positions among the prisoners, in large part because Communists were among the first people the Nazis put in the concentration camps.
USAFAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YokelRidesAgain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

German politics are fascinating. I love that they have a 'pirate' party, and that their legacy parties are panicked about the shifting winds.
They also have a comedy party (Die PARTEI), which actually has a seat in the European Parliament. Their aims include providing all citizens with a unicorn, rebuilding the Berlin Wall, waging a war of aggression against Liechtenstein, and amending the German constitution to reflect that the CEOs of television networks do not have human dignity.

Their youth wing is called the "Hintner Youth", and its official greeting is "Hi, Hintner!"
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sapper Redux said:

Multiple Waffen-SS units were associated with war crimes. I can think of at least one that ran a concentration camp. There were no clean SS units. Those were the true believers, though there were also conscripts amongst them, for whom on an individual case it may get more complicated.
if anything most of the Waffen SS units were the true believers who not only participated in murders of civilians but also murders of Allied soldiers

not to mention the vast majority were volunteers- and often times traitors of their own home countries who loved German National Socialism so much they left France to die in Berlin fighting the Soviets.
YokelRidesAgain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My favorite European party, Die PARTEI, appears to have gained an additional seat in the European Parliament.

Liechtenstein had better watch its back.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
byfLuger41
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is incredible!
byfLuger41
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In regards to OPs question, that is a very sensitive and dynamic topic.

For the past 30 years I have studied and collected artifacts from WWII. Of all the memoirs I have read, there are multiple accounts of SS units doing despicable things.

As an example and is somewhat relevant with the 80th anniversary of DDay, look up the Battle of Graignes. Here is a summary of what the 17th SS did a few days after the Normandy invasion:


"At the end of the 11 June battle, the 17th SS entered the church and found Captain Abraham 'Bud' Sophian's aid station. Sophian (battalion surgeon and paratrooper) had surrendered the building to them by waving a white flag at the door. SS troops forced the Captain, his two medics and 14 wounded American paratroopers to line up against a wall. The captured Americans were by definition POWs and therefore should have been protected under the terms of the Geneva Convention of 1929, which Germany was a signatory to. In fact, the wounded Americans were divided into two groups and murdered. One group of five wounded was taken to the edge of a nearby pond, where SS troops bayoneted them and threw their bodies into the water. The other group of nine were forced to march at gunpoint, approximately four kilometers to the South, to a field near the village of Le Mesnil-Angot. After arriving at the field, the group were forced to dig a pit which would be their own graves and then kneel down. After the hole had been dug, the SS shot each of the wounded men through the head and pushed their bodies into the pit.[1] At some point that same day, Captain Sophian and his two medics were also shot by the SS. Sophian's body was not recovered until the spring of 1945. Collectively, these 17 murders perpetrated by Waffen SS troops against defenseless prisoners of war constituted war crimes.

Other Germans began systematically rounding-up French civilians suspected of assisting US troops. A total of forty-four villagers were rounded up, interrogated by the Germans as suspected collaborators with the Americans and were then shot dead. Other SS men dragged Father Leblastier and Father Lebarbanchon from the rectory into the courtyard outside, and shot them both dead. The Germans then discovered Madeleine Pezeril and eighty-year-old Eugnie Dujardin and shot them both dead in their beds. Thereafter, the SS men ransacked the village for any valuables they could steal.

On Tuesday 13 June, the Germans burned the village. They poured gasoline over the bodies of Father Leblastier, Father Lebarbanchon, Eugnie Dujardin and Madeleine Pezeril and then set them on fire. The ensuing blaze was allowed to burn out of control, destroying 66 homes, the boys' school, Mme Boursier's caf, and the 12th-century church. Another 159 homes and other buildings were damaged either as a result of that fire or the fighting. Before the 11 June battle and the German retaliation that followed, the village of Graignes had consisted of just over two hundred dispersed homes and other structures. Afterward, only two houses survived unscathed.

By then most of the Graignes defenders had already left. Small groups arrived in Carentan late at night on the 12 June. Other troopers, some alone and some in pairs, continued to filter in on the 13 and 14 June. Twenty-one men hidden by the Rigault family and taken to Carentan by Joseph Folliot on the night of 15 to 16 June were the last from Graignes to make it back to U.S. lines. Out of the original 182 troopers involved in the defense of Graignes, 150 made it out alive.

Had the mis-dropped paratroopers of the 507th not stopped dead the advance of the 17th SS Panzer Grenadiers this division could have made it to Carentan before the 101st Airborne Division."

It's important to think objectively and not make hastily generalizations, but to make any concession for the SS and its members is foolish. I'm sure there may have been a few good individuals within its ranks, but collectively they were some ruthless soldiers, especially in the East.


There is a monument in Graignes dedicated to the fallen.


HTH, OP.




YokelRidesAgain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
byfLuger41 said:

It's important to think objectively and not make hastily generalizations, but to make any concession for the SS and its members is foolish. I'm sure there may have been a few good individuals within its ranks, but collectively they were some ruthless soldiers, especially in the East.
Clearly it is profoundly foolish for a politician to say anything conciliatory about Nazis (particularly a politician from a party suspected of sheltering racist elements).

Nonetheless, you're conceding that what the guy said was, in fact, true. Many SS members committed war crimes, but not all.

Saying that, for example, Gunter Grass was a war criminal because he was drafted into the Waffen SS at 17 is not even good nonsense.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
dcbowers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Or look up the story of Oradour-sur-Glane.

https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/oradour-sur-glane-martyred-village
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Rabid Cougar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Canadians had exceptional hatred for them . The 12th SS killed a bunch of Canadian POWS on 7 June 1944. It didn't take much for the Canadians to not "take prisoners" when they knew who the opponents were.
Windy City Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To consider whether the Waffen SS had some good eggs just following orders and not really complicit in war crimes, please consider the fundamental basis of the organization.

The origins of the SS were the Schutzstaffel, a paramilitary security group whose earliest member was Heinrich Himmler who joined in 1925 and took command in 1927.

Any interested member had to fully embrace the racist ideology of the Nazi party, providing proof of pure ancestry back to the 18th Century.

Ideological training for new recruits leaned heavily on Mein Kampf and Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Himmler's training pamphlet for new members stated that "never again in Germany, the heart of Europe, will the Jewish-Bolshevik revolution of subhumans be able to be kindled either from within or through emissaries from without."

The SS Junker schools would teach a form of extreme violence and send students out to watch and participate in the Einsatzgruppen actions that were war crimes on a massive scale in most cases.

And there were few avenues within the SS that did not involve war crimes. It was tasked with solving the biggest issues including the final solution, the racial and ethnic cleansing actions throughout Russia, Eastern Europe, and elsewhere, and state surveillance and repression. Even its direct fighting units who worked alongisde the German Army would engage in mass murder of civilians, burning of cities, and

So maybe some of those folks went off to be type-writer clerks with a better paycheck, they were well aware both of the core mission of the organization and the level of cruelty employed to meet Nazi party goals. They were complicit even if they were not doing the killing, because it seemed extremely unlikely that they did not embrace fully the ideologies that lead to such war crimes or could find a venue that let them conveniently ignore them.

,
YokelRidesAgain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Windy City Ag said:

To consider whether the Waffen SS had some good eggs just following orders and not really complicit in war crimes, please consider the fundamental basis of the organization.
I am well aware of the history of the Nazi regime.

But as I said at the outset, by 1944-45 the roles of the Wehrmacht and the Waffen SS were increasingly blurred.

Hell, by the end of the war Hitler had adolescents out in the streets of Berlin trying to fight Russian tanks.

No one is arguing that the SS was not the leading force in the horrors of the Third Reich; nonetheless, particularly at the end they were conscripting people who had essentially no choice unless they were willing to be summarily executed.

We call such people martyrs, and honor their memory, but few of us would have the moral courage to be among them.

I'll ask again, do you think Gunter Grass was a war criminal?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Windy City Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I'll ask again, do you think Gunter Grass was a war criminal?
If his account was an honest one . . probably not. There are legitimate reasons to not take his account at face value. He had volunteered for other parts of the service prior to his draft and not every conscript went right to the SS.

He claimed he served from April 44 - November 45 . . . .that was action on German territory so unless his unit was killing Red Army folks in a manner deemed to be violations of international legal agreements, he may have just been pushed into an unfortunate situation before becoming a casualty.

My first boss had a memorable saying . . . "When the police raid the ***** house, they arrest the piano player too."

Maybe applicable in this case.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.