My apologies if this has been discussed previously....
I received an email today that made the following claim:
"LSU (The Ole War Skule) in Baton Rouge has the distinction of contributing the most officers to WW II after the U.S. military academies."
This got my attention because I thought I'd remembered from my campusology that Texas A&M claimed that distinction. Looking online, I found the following LSU page:
http://www.lsu.edu/highlights/031/salutes.html
which seems to support the statement in the email without citing any information source.
Then, I went to a Handbook of Texas page:
http://tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/TT/kct8.html
Which said:
The university thus provided more officers for the armed forces during the war than both of the military academies combined.
The key phrase that seems to be missing here is "...than any other college/university".
So, I'm no further along in confirming or refuting the LSU claim. In fact, due to the fact that both colleges claims are superbly wordsmithed, it appears to me that both schools' claims may be correct. But the questionS remain in my mind:
Did LSU contribute the most officers for WWII after the service academies? Did TAMC produce more officers for WWII than any other college INCLUDING the service academies?
John in San Antonio
[This message has been edited by DogCo84 (edited 7/27/2008 7:57p).]
I received an email today that made the following claim:
"LSU (The Ole War Skule) in Baton Rouge has the distinction of contributing the most officers to WW II after the U.S. military academies."
This got my attention because I thought I'd remembered from my campusology that Texas A&M claimed that distinction. Looking online, I found the following LSU page:
http://www.lsu.edu/highlights/031/salutes.html
which seems to support the statement in the email without citing any information source.
Then, I went to a Handbook of Texas page:
http://tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/TT/kct8.html
Which said:
The university thus provided more officers for the armed forces during the war than both of the military academies combined.
The key phrase that seems to be missing here is "...than any other college/university".
So, I'm no further along in confirming or refuting the LSU claim. In fact, due to the fact that both colleges claims are superbly wordsmithed, it appears to me that both schools' claims may be correct. But the questionS remain in my mind:
Did LSU contribute the most officers for WWII after the service academies? Did TAMC produce more officers for WWII than any other college INCLUDING the service academies?
John in San Antonio
[This message has been edited by DogCo84 (edited 7/27/2008 7:57p).]