Buck or others, what is the consensus on the performance of these two? Is the Powerboost a good choice or were there lots of issues with it in the first year?
This is pretty much what my customers are saying. City driving uses the hybrid system more for better MPG. HWY driving is 20-22 MPG. I personally haven't got to drive one a ton since most of the ones I see are orders and haven't heard how they tow. I have not seen any alerts from Ford on any issues with the PowerBoost.Buck Compton said:
I have had a 2021 King Ranch Powerboost with 7.2 kW generator since last June. Over 40,000 miles on it now in 15 months with no issues whatsoever.
Used the on-board power 6-7 times and been clutch to go over the 2 kW of the ICE. Especially the 220 plug.
It has more power than the EcoBoost and will out-drag it to boot. The hard shifts are reduced from an ecoboost because you're not waiting for auto start/stop to start moving. The electric motor starts moving you in the interim.
Better gas mileage as well. The more city driving, the more the electric motor kicks in and helps your MPG go up. On highway it'll be marginally (if any) better than ecoboost. I think Ford hit it out of the park with this one, but I'm still only at 40,000. A lot could still go wrong.
I guess it depends on how you drive it. I really haven't had any issues in traffic or at stop lights. Much better than my wife's ecoboost with start/stop and without the hybrid. I also don't try to slam on the gas just to slam on the breaks in traffic either like she does. I hate the start/stop in hers. It definitely isn't like my old 5.0, but I don't even notice it anymore.AggieKO said:
I have a 22 powerboost. I will say normal driving and highway driving has been a breeze, but driving in heavy traffic (a lot of stopping and going) isn't a very pleasant experience. In that scenario ive experienced a lot of hard shifts and it just feels clunky with the motor having to constantly turn on and off.
Yeah, best I could tell was a "faulty ground", but I just couldn't drive 14 hours with it like that. Ford needs to figure that out and push an update.mosdefn14 said:
I think this is a Ford issue. Dad and I swap trailers regularly and his F250 is always yelling about trailer lights, but my GMC never does. Something to do with the grounding at the trailer (painted vs bare metal) making the software angry.
Buck Compton said:Yeah, best I could tell was a "faulty ground", but I just couldn't drive 14 hours with it like that. Ford needs to figure that out and push an update.mosdefn14 said:
I think this is a Ford issue. Dad and I swap trailers regularly and his F250 is always yelling about trailer lights, but my GMC never does. Something to do with the grounding at the trailer (painted vs bare metal) making the software angry.
Exactly.mts6175 said:
Not to get political, but the Powerboost and new Hybrid Tundra are the EV model that we should be pushing as a whole instead of full on electric vehicle. It just makes more sense to combine technologies rather than just jump off a cliff.
I've got one on order right now. From what my dealer told me, 3-7 months.AggieMPH2005 said:
What's the order lead time on these? 6 months?
Eh, different for everyone. For the majority of people that travel less than 50 miles round trip a day, EV's make perfect sense. For anyone who regularly takes long trips, hauls, etc., then I agree. Other argument against hybrid's is you have some complications of both systems vs. just having electric.mts6175 said:
Not to get political, but the Powerboost and new Hybrid Tundra are the EV model that we should be pushing as a whole instead of full on electric vehicle. It just makes more sense to combine technologies rather than just jump off a cliff.
$80k on the dot after TT&L. Trucks getting crazy expensive, but at least it isn't a $100k Super Duty!Hungry Ojos said:
Mind sharing how much it set you back?
That's what I paid for my Raptor earlier this year. The only option I didn't get was the carbon fiber.Hungry Ojos said:
Damn!
So I'm assuming that a powerboost is significantly more expensive than the regular eco boost right?
Reason I asked, I ordered a 2023 King Ranch eco boost FX4 with most of the bells and whistles and ended up at $79k how were you able to get a platinum powerboost for only a grand more????
Shooter McGavin said:Exactly.mts6175 said:
Not to get political, but the Powerboost and new Hybrid Tundra are the EV model that we should be pushing as a whole instead of full on electric vehicle. It just makes more sense to combine technologies rather than just jump off a cliff.
This type of technology meshes the best of both worlds. When I fill up my Powerboost I have a range of over 700 miles on one tank.
When sitting at the Sonic, even though the vehicle is on it uses electric power and doesn't pollute or use fuel.
I'm getting 24 mpg, about the same as the Lexus ES 350 sedan I was driving.
htxag09 said:Eh, different for everyone. For the majority of people that travel less than 50 miles round trip a day, EV's make perfect sense. For anyone who regularly takes long trips, hauls, etc., then I agree. Other argument against hybrid's is you have some complications of both systems vs. just having electric.mts6175 said:
Not to get political, but the Powerboost and new Hybrid Tundra are the EV model that we should be pushing as a whole instead of full on electric vehicle. It just makes more sense to combine technologies rather than just jump off a cliff.
I have 5k now on my 22 Powerboost XLT. I haven't had any issues so far and I am pleased with the gas mileage I'm getting. I'm getting 25 mpg on mine. I don't try to hypermile the thing, but I don't have a leadfoot either.12th Man Ag said:
Buck or others, what is the consensus on the performance of these two? Is the Powerboost a good choice or were there lots of issues with it in the first year?