Aggieland
Sponsored by

$540MM College Station budget for FY2025

5,955 Views | 61 Replies | Last: 7 mo ago by TyHolden
EriktheRed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Have a look...

College Station City Council takes first look at proposed $540 million budget for FY25

https://www.kbtx.com/2024/07/09/college-station-city-council-takes-first-look-proposed-540-million-budget-fy25/
Craig Regan 14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My pen is already outta ink

Just some quick notes

Our budget has grown 58% in 4 years (340m-540m) = 20k per new resident (+10k)

Debt service has grown 45%

Taxes have increased over + $1000 on the average home (360k) over that time frame

But I think my takeaways are this

1.) CIP and infrastructure costs are totally out of control.

$70m to drill 3 new wells which dropped out of the sky this year. No mention of them in previous years. 10% increase in water rates

The simple answer to this is truthfully most CASH shoved into CIP. Only way to avoid debt on something that is required

2.) our debt growth rate y over y is 4 times higher that staff salary costs. Increases over the past 4 years


3.) o&m is up but the GF got some additional heft to it because of land sales and other one time things. That money needs to be either invested or used for CIP (tax cut?)

4.) clear guidelines for future buying and building have to be laid down. There are no more free dollars to be thrown around on pet project and I do not see any property tax cuts coming

- city raised an additional $6m + on increased property values but that is a drop when you consider the budget increased by $48m

A lot more to go over but frankly COCS government balance sheet has exploded and with all the new REV it appears there is no end to the demand for taxes. Which in an economy like ours only spells more pain for homeowners and renters.
EriktheRed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks for the info. I posted it knowing you would dig in to it a little. I look forward to digging into it a bit more and seeing what all is said at the meeting Thursday night.
ReelAg6
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Craig Regan 14 said:

My pen is already outta ink

Just some quick notes

Our budget has grown 58% in 4 years (340m-540m) = 20k per new resident (+10k)

Debt service has grown 45%

Taxes have increased over + $1000 on the average home (360k) over that time frame

But I think my takeaways are this

1.) CIP and infrastructure costs are totally out of control.

$70m to drill 3 new wells which dropped out of the sky this year. No mention of them in previous years. 10% increase in water rates

The simple answer to this is truthfully most CASH shoved into CIP. Only way to avoid debt on something that is required

2.) our debt growth rate y over y is 4 times higher that staff salary costs. Increases over the past 4 years


3.) o&m is up but the GF got some additional heft to it because of land sales and other one time things. That money needs to be either invested or used for CIP (tax cut?)

4.) clear guidelines for future buying and building have to be laid down. There are no more free dollars to be thrown around on pet project and I do not see any property tax cuts coming

- city raised an additional $6m + on increased property values but that is a drop when you consider the budget increased by $48m

A lot more to go over but frankly COCS government balance sheet has exploded and with all the new REV it appears there is no end to the demand for taxes. Which in an economy like ours only spells more pain for homeowners and renters.



And our commercial tenants that are already struggling. Make no mistake, property taxes are playing a role in all these restaurants and businesses closing.
Craig Regan 14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks but allow me a moment optimism

I see nothing but a positive future for College Station because it is in our hands. It is within our control.

To make College Station a great place to live and thrive but only if WE make it so.

So let us get to work! Because this is (Y)OUR home!
Craig Regan 14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There are things we can and things we should not do.

But rule number one

No one ever taxed their way to prosperity. Only growth will solve these issues. And I do not mean just more roof tops but economic expansion vertically.

Meaning more money in private hands (where it belongs) means more room for company's to grow, more room to pay employees higher wages: so on and so on

But this will take a disciplined and high energy effort on the part of council & staff. This cannot be done with simple slogans and political hot air but actual policy dedicated to the task.

Best Regards
Red Pear Luke (BCS)
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
ReelAg6 said:

Craig Regan 14 said:

My pen is already outta ink

Just some quick notes

Our budget has grown 58% in 4 years (340m-540m) = 20k per new resident (+10k)

Debt service has grown 45%

Taxes have increased over + $1000 on the average home (360k) over that time frame

But I think my takeaways are this

1.) CIP and infrastructure costs are totally out of control.

$70m to drill 3 new wells which dropped out of the sky this year. No mention of them in previous years. 10% increase in water rates

The simple answer to this is truthfully most CASH shoved into CIP. Only way to avoid debt on something that is required

2.) our debt growth rate y over y is 4 times higher that staff salary costs. Increases over the past 4 years


3.) o&m is up but the GF got some additional heft to it because of land sales and other one time things. That money needs to be either invested or used for CIP (tax cut?)

4.) clear guidelines for future buying and building have to be laid down. There are no more free dollars to be thrown around on pet project and I do not see any property tax cuts coming

- city raised an additional $6m + on increased property values but that is a drop when you consider the budget increased by $48m

A lot more to go over but frankly COCS government balance sheet has exploded and with all the new REV it appears there is no end to the demand for taxes. Which in an economy like ours only spells more pain for homeowners and renters.



And our commercial tenants that are already struggling. Make no mistake, property taxes are playing a role in all these restaurants and businesses closing.


COCS responding to the property taxes:

woodiewood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Craig Regan 14 said:

My pen is already outta ink

Just some quick notes

Our budget has grown 58% in 4 years (340m-540m) = 20k per new resident (+10k)

Debt service has grown 45%

Taxes have increased over + $1000 on the average home (360k) over that time frame

But I think my takeaways are this

1.) CIP and infrastructure costs are totally out of control.

$70m to drill 3 new wells which dropped out of the sky this year. No mention of them in previous years. 10% increase in water rates

The simple answer to this is truthfully most CASH shoved into CIP. Only way to avoid debt on something that is required

2.) our debt growth rate y over y is 4 times higher that staff salary costs. Increases over the past 4 years


3.) o&m is up but the GF got some additional heft to it because of land sales and other one time things. That money needs to be either invested or used for CIP (tax cut?)

4.) clear guidelines for future buying and building have to be laid down. There are no more free dollars to be thrown around on pet project and I do not see any property tax cuts coming

- city raised an additional $6m + on increased property values but that is a drop when you consider the budget increased by $48m

A lot more to go over but frankly COCS government balance sheet has exploded and with all the new REV it appears there is no end to the demand for taxes. Which in an economy like ours only spells more pain for homeowners and renters.

There should be a cap on the annual increase in all property taxes including commercial properties.

Also without the voters paying for it, there should be a cap on the allowable annual increase in the budget for the city. A 14% annual increase over four years is excessive.

Without tight oversight, government at all levels will never quench its thirst for OPM.

SAC4311
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Inflation is up 20% since 2021 and the City Employees are getting a 3% adjustment this year. What have the last couple of years looked like for them on adjustments? This makes it look like we aren't keeping up with inflation alone.
Craig Regan 14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Employees got 6% last year and 3-4% this year.

Employee retention has been a problem for a while in COCS.

But I do not think it is just about the money. It never really is just about money.


My 2 cents
SAC4311
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree there are always multiple factors. Bryan/College Station seems to be a stepping stone area for many job markets.

That said, compensation is usually one of the primary motivators employment or changes in employment. Just to match inflation the city employees would have had to give a 10% increase in 2022, or 5% in both 21 and 22. Not matching inflation is like taking a pay decrease when goods, services, and rent continue to increase exponentially.
Craig Regan 14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think if you are a town facing a debt service growth of 45%

And you still have to grow your CIP by 29%

It is time to take a step back and think differently. Business as usual will not make this a thriving community but your point one that is just hanging on.

took another $6m+ out of the economy in taxable value increases.

$6,000,000 not going to our businesses ours employees, ya know, the virtuous cycle of economics.

The growth of GOV balance sheets has been and continues to be my primary serious concern.
Grmpy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SAC4311 said:

I agree there are always multiple factors. Bryan/College Station seems to be a stepping stone area for many job markets.

That said, compensation is usually one of the primary motivators employment or changes in employment. Just to match inflation the city employees would have had to give a 10% increase in 2022, or 5% in both 21 and 22. Not matching inflation is like taking a pay decrease when goods, services, and rent continue to increase exponentially.
You are correct, however I don't know any businesses in College Station that has increased wages along with inflation. And Government should be the last to increase wages to match inflation simply due to the method it gets revenue.

I'm seeing a lack of concern from College Station on managing this city conservatively. Instead, they want to spend other peoples money a little too freely for my taste.
2020
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Grmpy said:

SAC4311 said:

I agree there are always multiple factors. Bryan/College Station seems to be a stepping stone area for many job markets.

That said, compensation is usually one of the primary motivators employment or changes in employment. Just to match inflation the city employees would have had to give a 10% increase in 2022, or 5% in both 21 and 22. Not matching inflation is like taking a pay decrease when goods, services, and rent continue to increase exponentially.
You are correct, however I don't know any businesses in College Station that has increased wages along with inflation. And Government should be the last to increase wages to match inflation simply due to the method it gets revenue.

I'm seeing a lack of concern from College Station on managing this city conservatively. Instead, they want to spend other peoples money a little too freely for my taste.


Except on themselves…..somehow when discussing wages not keeping up a major point often gets left out. City management and department directors all have annual increases that outpace inflation by a wide margin. Meanwhile, the boots on the ground get fractions of those same percentages.

Source: https://govsalaries.com/salaries/TX/city-of-college-station

Since covid, the pay jumps for management have skyrocketed. "Do what we say, not what we do."
SAC4311
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Paying government employees fair wages and trying to keep up with inflation isn't exactly what I would call waste. Yes tax money largely pays these wages but it's not as if you get nothing out of your taxes. Imagine having lower taxes but not having an ambulance or police officer any closer to you than 30 minutes in the case of an emergency. This is a part of what your tax money goes too.

Admittedly the other part, here locally, is spent on mall properties and non-baseball fields though
Hornbeck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SAC4311 said:

Inflation is up 20% since 2021 and the City Employees are getting a 3% adjustment this year. What have the last couple of years looked like for them on adjustments? This makes it look like we aren't keeping up with inflation alone.


No one is keeping pace with inflation. That's the problem. I work for a large company. I got a 3% raise this year. None the previous two years because "times were tight".

The people who are the unseen Illuminati running city council are a bunch of retirees, who vote as a block, and do not see these tax increases. They don't feel the pain of taking millions out of the local economy.

I've been mad about this for a while, but I'm just a tin foil hat kook.
Craig Regan 14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We can have a conversation regarding staff and their salary's but let's make one thing perfectly clear

The above subject is NOTHING compared to our debt service and capital improvement budget.

Combined they are nearly $200m

That is the key to the whole thing. Getting a handle on those costs is KEY to any sort of stability in taxes/budget.
Hornbeck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When COVID hit, the mantra from the city, the county, everybody in government was, "We're all in this together".

The mantra since the economy has imploded is "we have to keep up with inflation"., when government is the ones that caused the inflation.

Someone has to be the "adults in the room" and bring some common sense in here. Realizing that buying large boat anchors (Macy's) is not a good idea. Realizing that as you continue to ratchet up taxes, property owners pass those costs along to their tenants (businesses take a hit, and you lose more sales tax) Realizing that will hit a point of diminishing returns at some point.

I'm realizing that pretty much no one in Brazos County government are "the adults in the room".
Craig Regan 14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The mantra should always be "we are in this together"

Because WE ARE. And always WILL BE

It is councils role to lead and in order to lead you have bring the city together around common goals.

1) how do we keep our economy in the hands of citizens rather than GOV


2) how do create the most virtuous cycle between what is required (CIP - infrastructure - public safety)

3) Make sure councils/citizen that follow us have the best circumstances to fulfill the above outlined goals

The only way to do this is lay down clear milestones and markers that show we are on that track.

Only clear, orderly and policy based choices will get us there.
Grmpy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ambulances are private companies as well. These businesses don't have to perform with high efficiency as they don't have to survive off of performance. But your seeing my bias against government in general.

I would never say fair wages shouldn't occur; however if businesses are unable to keep wages in place due to taxes; it doesn't make since that government can do it without concern.
Grmpy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Craig Regan 14 said:

We can have a conversation regarding staff and their salary's but let's make one thing perfectly clear

The above subject is NOTHING compared to our debt service and capital improvement budget.

Combined they are nearly $200m

That is the key to the whole thing. Getting a handle on those costs is KEY to any sort of stability in taxes/budget.
I'm pretty much Dave Ramsey aligned when it comes to Debt. I personally don't find it to be beneficial for any organization. Everyone talks about leverage until the water recedes and we catch everyone not wearing swimming trunks... do paraphrase Buffet.
woodiewood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SAC4311 said:

Inflation is up 20% since 2021 and the City Employees are getting a 3% adjustment this year. What have the last couple of years looked like for them on adjustments? This makes it look like we aren't keeping up with inflation alone.
If that is correct, obviously the bulk of the 58% increase in the past four years has not gone to employee salaries and retention efforts.

As far as the comment about wells being drilled, could not a little more planning made so that one well drilled a year or every two years so the cost would not have the impact on one year's expenditures?
nwspmp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
woodiewood said:

SAC4311 said:

Inflation is up 20% since 2021 and the City Employees are getting a 3% adjustment this year. What have the last couple of years looked like for them on adjustments? This makes it look like we aren't keeping up with inflation alone.
If that is correct, obviously the bulk of the 58% increase in the past four years has not gone to employee salaries and retention efforts.

As far as the comment about wells being drilled, could not a little more planning made so that one well drilled a year or every two years so the cost would not have the impact on one year's expenditures?
I seem to recall that there is a newly permitted player to the water availability in northern Brazos County and southern Robertson county that was approved for a VERY large amount of water to be pulled from that supply, which reduces the production capability for the existing wells, private and government-owned, in the area.

Edit: https://www.kbtx.com/2022/11/01/permit-approved-that-would-remove-large-amounts-water-robertson-county/

If that's the case, would it make sense that getting production into play now would be cheaper potentially then having to do it in a rush later?
Craig Regan 14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are correct - salary's and benefits line item is up about 7-8% over the last four years. $60m -> ~$66m

For those currently employed.

What is up is CIP projects and debt. That is what is creating such huge issues.

I have been for the past 5-6 years trying to bring people's attention to this matter. It is swallowing our economy from the inside out. The vast majority of these projects are repair and do not really add much in way of jobs or increased wages. The usual benefits of infrastructure spending.

This is JUST repair. You want to cut taxes ? You want to stabilize our budget growth? You have to start there.

As far as the wells go, I cannot really offer much besides "surprise" we need more water wells = $70m

AGAIN, over and over I am calling for a much more strategic view of our budget and priorities.
Craig Regan 14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think the "now" vs "later" argument is fair only if you consider COCS didn't see this coming a mile away… which they should have.

Our population has not EXPLODED to the point where you just have to dig wells ASAP or else. It has been and will be a steadily increasing numbers.

10k over 5 years is not a HUGE number.

But if you rush now you are rushing into a material inflation market and prices will increase. Which goes to say that these should be built 1 at a time but those moneys used should have been piling up to pay for it. At least a part of it.

We are gonna have to borrow to build those wells - we do not have $70m laying around. But staff used the term "Immediately" several times when referencing said wells.


People have to understand this kind of tax and spending is not good for the local economy.
2020
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Grmpy said:

Ambulances are private companies as well. These businesses don't have to perform with high efficiency as they don't have to survive off of performance. But your seeing my bias against government in general.

I would never say fair wages shouldn't occur; however if businesses are unable to keep wages in place due to taxes; it doesn't make since that government can do it without concern.


Both Bryan Fire Dept and College Station Fire Dept operate their own ambulances and they are most certainly not "private companies". There are numerous private companies that DO operate ambulances but locally in Brazos County ALL 911 EMS ambulance response is provided by BFD, CSFD, & TAMU EMS.
The exception to this being any mutual aid or automatic aid agreements with other services such as St Joseph EMS or other various agencies.

Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

10k over 5 years is not a HUGE number.

If you think the CS population has only increased 10k over 5 years I have a bridge to sell you.

And then add the influx of people who live outside the city limits yet utilize CS in virtually every similar way us residents do, and we've got a growth explosion.
nwspmp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Craig Regan 14 said:

I think the "now" vs "later" argument is fair only if you consider COCS didn't see this coming a mile away… which they should have.

Our population has not EXPLODED to the point where you just have to dig wells ASAP or else. It has been and will be a steadily increasing numbers.

10k over 5 years is not a HUGE number.

But if you rush now you are rushing into a material inflation market and prices will increase. Which goes to say that these should be built 1 at a time but those moneys used should have been piling up to pay for it. At least a part of it.

We are gonna have to borrow to build those wells - we do not have $70m laying around. But staff used the term "Immediately" several times when referencing said wells.


People have to understand this kind of tax and spending is not good for the local economy.
If the existing wells were sufficient to cover expected growth over time (with some savings to expand later, slowly), and a new entry comes in and takes enough of the water that emergency wells are needed, how is that the fault of COCS?

I would expect that COCS had the budget to expand at a regular rate, commensurate with population growth, but this new drain on the water table probably threw out those projections. The approval for those applications to draw down the supply came from the Brazos Valley Groundwater Conservation Board, of which COCS is only another customer.

Had they been hoarding cash to pay for a possible lack of water supply from a third party, and that threat never materialized, then we'd be rightly excoriating them for taking money from citizens that wasn't being used.

It's easy to look in hind sight to find the errors, but unless this new entity drawing from their 13 wells and very large water draw (permitted for about 1/3 of San Antonio's total consumption) planned this years ago, publicly floated their intentions, and only filed in late 2022, then it's tough to predict that someone might come in and suddenly decide to take out as much water as Bryan, College Station and TAMU collectively use and send it away from the area. By all public accounts, this operation was a 2022 timeframe.

https://www.goodland-farms.com/faq - Check out the last one, refers to this document, where the lowering of the well table is a known and strong likelihood as a result of the UW Brazos Valley well operation.

https://brazosvalleygcd.org/files/?upf=dl&id=14418

To me, this seems like an expensive but likely needed measure to ensure security of that resource against what a private entity is doing with the help of a friendly semi-local agency with oversight approval.

By no means am I happy about it, but hand-waving that they should've known someone would come in and over double the water drawdown for export in our area and slow-rolling the solution doesn't seem right. If there are realistic other options, then that's fine and would be certainly welcome. The city government holding on to an amount of cash to cover highly unlikely or out-of-the-ordinary scenarios "just in case" seems worse over all to me, which is what it seems you think they should've done.
jwhitlock3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2020 said:

Grmpy said:

SAC4311 said:

I agree there are always multiple factors. Bryan/College Station seems to be a stepping stone area for many job markets.

That said, compensation is usually one of the primary motivators employment or changes in employment. Just to match inflation the city employees would have had to give a 10% increase in 2022, or 5% in both 21 and 22. Not matching inflation is like taking a pay decrease when goods, services, and rent continue to increase exponentially.
You are correct, however I don't know any businesses in College Station that has increased wages along with inflation. And Government should be the last to increase wages to match inflation simply due to the method it gets revenue.

I'm seeing a lack of concern from College Station on managing this city conservatively. Instead, they want to spend other peoples money a little too freely for my taste.


Except on themselves…..somehow when discussing wages not keeping up a major point often gets left out. City management and department directors all have annual increases that outpace inflation by a wide margin. Meanwhile, the boots on the ground get fractions of those same percentages.

Source: https://govsalaries.com/salaries/TX/city-of-college-station

Since covid, the pay jumps for management have skyrocketed. "Do what we say, not what we do."
Wow, City Manager went from $198,276 in 2020 to $314,964 in 2023. Website you linked says he's currently paid 79% higher than the average City Manager position for the state of Texas. Drop in the bucket for the overall budget perhaps, but the number/increase is a bit shocking to me.
woodiewood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Craig Regan 14 said:

The mantra should always be "we are in this together"

Because WE ARE. And always WILL BE

It is councils role to lead and in order to lead you have bring the city together around common goals.

1) how do we keep our economy in the hands of citizens rather than GOV


2) how do create the most virtuous cycle between what is required (CIP - infrastructure - public safety)

3) Make sure councils/citizen that follow us have the best circumstances to fulfill the above outlined goals

The only way to do this is lay down clear milestones and markers that show we are on that track.

Only clear, orderly and policy based choices will get us there.
The only way to control the increase in government spending year in and year out is to have strict and legal limits on expenditures and not rely on their good judgement which many don't have.
woodiewood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jwhitlock3 said:

2020 said:

Grmpy said:

SAC4311 said:

I agree there are always multiple factors. Bryan/College Station seems to be a stepping stone area for many job markets.

That said, compensation is usually one of the primary motivators employment or changes in employment. Just to match inflation the city employees would have had to give a 10% increase in 2022, or 5% in both 21 and 22. Not matching inflation is like taking a pay decrease when goods, services, and rent continue to increase exponentially.
You are correct, however I don't know any businesses in College Station that has increased wages along with inflation. And Government should be the last to increase wages to match inflation simply due to the method it gets revenue.

I'm seeing a lack of concern from College Station on managing this city conservatively. Instead, they want to spend other peoples money a little too freely for my taste.


Except on themselves…..somehow when discussing wages not keeping up a major point often gets left out. City management and department directors all have annual increases that outpace inflation by a wide margin. Meanwhile, the boots on the ground get fractions of those same percentages.

Source: https://govsalaries.com/salaries/TX/city-of-college-station

Since covid, the pay jumps for management have skyrocketed. "Do what we say, not what we do."
Wow, City Manager went from $198,276 in 2020 to $314,964 in 2023. Website you linked says he's currently paid 79% higher than the average City Manager position for the state of Texas. Drop in the bucket for the overall budget perhaps, but the number/increase is a bit shocking to me.
You telling us that you didn't get a 58% raise over those three years?
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Wow, City Manager went from $198,276 in 2020 to $314,964 in 2023. Website you linked says he's currently paid 79% higher than the average City Manager position for the state of Texas. Drop in the bucket for the overall budget perhaps, but the number/increase is a bit shocking to me.

Round Rock (130,406 population) CM makes $350,000. Pearland $312k. Midland $350k.

I don't see anything out of wack with our CM's salary given our population and growth trajectory.

2020
How long do you want to ignore this user?
woodiewood said:

jwhitlock3 said:

2020 said:

Grmpy said:

SAC4311 said:

I agree there are always multiple factors. Bryan/College Station seems to be a stepping stone area for many job markets.

That said, compensation is usually one of the primary motivators employment or changes in employment. Just to match inflation the city employees would have had to give a 10% increase in 2022, or 5% in both 21 and 22. Not matching inflation is like taking a pay decrease when goods, services, and rent continue to increase exponentially.
You are correct, however I don't know any businesses in College Station that has increased wages along with inflation. And Government should be the last to increase wages to match inflation simply due to the method it gets revenue.

I'm seeing a lack of concern from College Station on managing this city conservatively. Instead, they want to spend other peoples money a little too freely for my taste.


Except on themselves…..somehow when discussing wages not keeping up a major point often gets left out. City management and department directors all have annual increases that outpace inflation by a wide margin. Meanwhile, the boots on the ground get fractions of those same percentages.

Source: https://govsalaries.com/salaries/TX/city-of-college-station

Since covid, the pay jumps for management have skyrocketed. "Do what we say, not what we do."
Wow, City Manager went from $198,276 in 2020 to $314,964 in 2023. Website you linked says he's currently paid 79% higher than the average City Manager position for the state of Texas. Drop in the bucket for the overall budget perhaps, but the number/increase is a bit shocking to me.
You telling us that you didn't get a 58% raise over those three years?



WOW!! I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that the average city worker didn't get anywhere near that percentage increase……. Might explain the massive attrition of experienced, motivated, & long tenured folks over the last few years.
EriktheRed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bunk Moreland said:

Quote:

10k over 5 years is not a HUGE number.

If you think the CS population has only increased 10k over 5 years I have a bridge to sell you.

And then add the influx of people who live outside the city limits yet utilize CS in virtually every similar way us residents do, and we've got a growth explosion.
According to the Existing Condition Report done related to the new city Housing Action Plan, 69% of the people who work in the College Station city limits don't live in the CS city limits.

That seems like a HUGE # to me
SAC4311
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Honestly most employees probably can't afford it
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.