Craig Regan 14 said:
I think the "now" vs "later" argument is fair only if you consider COCS didn't see this coming a mile away… which they should have.
Our population has not EXPLODED to the point where you just have to dig wells ASAP or else. It has been and will be a steadily increasing numbers.
10k over 5 years is not a HUGE number.
But if you rush now you are rushing into a material inflation market and prices will increase. Which goes to say that these should be built 1 at a time but those moneys used should have been piling up to pay for it. At least a part of it.
We are gonna have to borrow to build those wells - we do not have $70m laying around. But staff used the term "Immediately" several times when referencing said wells.
People have to understand this kind of tax and spending is not good for the local economy.
If the existing wells were sufficient to cover expected growth over time (with some savings to expand later, slowly), and a new entry comes in and takes enough of the water that emergency wells are needed, how is that the fault of COCS?
I would expect that COCS had the budget to expand at a regular rate, commensurate with population growth, but this new drain on the water table probably threw out those projections. The approval for those applications to draw down the supply came from the Brazos Valley Groundwater Conservation Board, of which COCS is only another customer.
Had they been hoarding cash to pay for a possible lack of water supply from a third party, and that threat never materialized, then we'd be rightly
excoriating them for taking money from citizens that wasn't being used.
It's easy to look in hind sight to find the errors, but unless this new entity drawing from their 13 wells and very large water draw (permitted for about 1/3 of San Antonio's total consumption) planned this years ago, publicly floated their intentions, and only filed in late 2022, then it's tough to predict that someone might come in and suddenly decide to take out as much water as Bryan, College Station and TAMU collectively use and send it away from the area. By all public accounts, this operation was a 2022 timeframe.
https://www.goodland-farms.com/faq - Check out the last one, refers to this document, where the lowering of the well table is a known and strong likelihood as a result of the UW Brazos Valley well operation.
https://brazosvalleygcd.org/files/?upf=dl&id=14418To me, this seems like an expensive but likely needed measure to ensure security of that resource against what a private entity is doing with the help of a friendly semi-local agency with oversight approval.
By no means am I happy about it, but hand-waving that they should've known someone would come in and over double the water drawdown for export in our area and slow-rolling the solution doesn't seem right. If there are realistic other options, then that's fine and would be certainly welcome. The city government holding on to an amount of cash to cover highly unlikely or out-of-the-ordinary scenarios "just in case" seems worse over all to me, which is what it seems you think they should've done.