Disclosure: this is buz coming from me speaking with a manufacturer, Shot Show this past week, and some FB groups I'm on. All seem to corroborate so I guess it's legit.
Things aren't looking good for the 8.6blk. It was hoped that SAAMI would be voting this week on its approval. Didn't go well. Hornady isn't backing it as it stands, supposedly over the 1:3 twist. Q/Kevin Brittingham is being blamed for the "ridiculous" twists rate and overhyped TP. This in addition to the legal concerns from standard/bonded bullets not holding up to the high twist rate. Add in the fact that most people will be running a can that would be damaged. Then there is the fact that current manufacturers are having to make different loads based on barrel length (12", 16", etc) and the confusion rises.
A 1:5 or 1:6.5 is being suggested. My buddy at Gorilla confirms they are having better accuracy with slowing the twist. While we can get MOAs near 1.5@100 "sometimes" (anyone telling you better is lying), the 1:3 twist is just plain unreliable in accuracy. They (and I) have experienced random flyers no matter what the load. Sometimes over a foot away. This is the first round that I've ever doped out spin drift starting at just over 200 yards (but I know this isn't really designed to be shooting over 200).
The 8.6 at 1:3 just isn't known for its accuracy, despite the punch.
Hornady is definitely out as it stands but Kevin B is in talks with Nosler.
Without either of their backing, it will either need to be resubmitted (they say they could revisit again in the summer and vote) with a slower twist or this will remain a boutique cartridge for hand loaders. I have a feeling there's plenty of hog hunters who will be pushing to not let this die.
I'll try to follow up.
Things aren't looking good for the 8.6blk. It was hoped that SAAMI would be voting this week on its approval. Didn't go well. Hornady isn't backing it as it stands, supposedly over the 1:3 twist. Q/Kevin Brittingham is being blamed for the "ridiculous" twists rate and overhyped TP. This in addition to the legal concerns from standard/bonded bullets not holding up to the high twist rate. Add in the fact that most people will be running a can that would be damaged. Then there is the fact that current manufacturers are having to make different loads based on barrel length (12", 16", etc) and the confusion rises.
A 1:5 or 1:6.5 is being suggested. My buddy at Gorilla confirms they are having better accuracy with slowing the twist. While we can get MOAs near 1.5@100 "sometimes" (anyone telling you better is lying), the 1:3 twist is just plain unreliable in accuracy. They (and I) have experienced random flyers no matter what the load. Sometimes over a foot away. This is the first round that I've ever doped out spin drift starting at just over 200 yards (but I know this isn't really designed to be shooting over 200).
The 8.6 at 1:3 just isn't known for its accuracy, despite the punch.
Hornady is definitely out as it stands but Kevin B is in talks with Nosler.
Without either of their backing, it will either need to be resubmitted (they say they could revisit again in the summer and vote) with a slower twist or this will remain a boutique cartridge for hand loaders. I have a feeling there's plenty of hog hunters who will be pushing to not let this die.
I'll try to follow up.