I don't know how often it comes up, but it is sometimes possible to obtain a Right of First Refusal to a property. That is, if the owner sells it, you have the right to buy it under the same terms negotiated by a prospective buyer.
There was a recent case in Amarillo regarding a fireworks stand owner with a lease on a property and a Right of First Refusal to buy the property if it sells. The owner then sold the property to a group (I guess that's the right term) without notifying them that the fireworks stand owner had a Right of First Refusal. In fact, the owner let the buyer assume that the fireworks stand belonged to the owner, not a third party. When they then conveyed the property to the members of the group who then sold the property to another company, the owner of the fireworks stand then tried to enforce the Right of First Refusal.
From the article linked below, if the buyer has no notice that someone had a Right of First Refusal on the property, then the holder of that right has no action to take against the buyer of the property.
From https://agrilife.org/texasaglaw/2022/06/27/rights-of-first-refusal-and-the-importance-of-record-notice/
(On a side note, original owners were a Mr and Mrs Ivy, but they are collectively referred to as the Iveys! I never would have guessed that.)
Anyway, I've heard of the Right of First Refusal from time to time, but I never actually ran across it in use. I've been told that it can reduce the value of the land a bit because some prospective buyers might not want to go to the bother of negotiating a deal and then someone else taking the deal they negotiated away from them.
There was a recent case in Amarillo regarding a fireworks stand owner with a lease on a property and a Right of First Refusal to buy the property if it sells. The owner then sold the property to a group (I guess that's the right term) without notifying them that the fireworks stand owner had a Right of First Refusal. In fact, the owner let the buyer assume that the fireworks stand belonged to the owner, not a third party. When they then conveyed the property to the members of the group who then sold the property to another company, the owner of the fireworks stand then tried to enforce the Right of First Refusal.
From the article linked below, if the buyer has no notice that someone had a Right of First Refusal on the property, then the holder of that right has no action to take against the buyer of the property.
From https://agrilife.org/texasaglaw/2022/06/27/rights-of-first-refusal-and-the-importance-of-record-notice/
Quote:
HD Defendants argue that they are protected by the "bona fide purchaser defense." This defense provides that a third-party interest in property is binding on a subsequent purchaser for value if it was duly recorded or the purchaser had notice of the interest. An unrecorded conveyance of an interest in land is void as to a subsequent purchaser who buys the property for valuable consideration and without notice. Notice may be record notice, actual notice, or constructive notice. A party's bona-fide-purchaser status may be transferred, meaning a purchaser from a bona fide purchaser takes good title even if that subsequent purchaser had knowledge of the third party's interest at the time of its purchase.
...
The most important lesson from this case is to ensure any interest in land is properly recorded in the deed records immediately. This is certainly true for rights of first refusal, but can also be important for other rights such as leases or easements. The only way to ensure notice to any and all third parties is to have these rights recorded in the deed records of the land. Here, had Mr. W recorded its Memorandum of Lease prior to the HD Exchange purchase, HD Exchange would not have been deemed a bona fide purchaser of the land.
(On a side note, original owners were a Mr and Mrs Ivy, but they are collectively referred to as the Iveys! I never would have guessed that.)
Anyway, I've heard of the Right of First Refusal from time to time, but I never actually ran across it in use. I've been told that it can reduce the value of the land a bit because some prospective buyers might not want to go to the bother of negotiating a deal and then someone else taking the deal they negotiated away from them.