I didn't want to derail the other reloading thread, but I noticed several posters recommend trimming rifle brass after sizing (neck or FL).
I am conflicted on this. I own 2 manual trimmers (Reading & Forster). Each uses a caliber-specific mandrel to pilot the case and ensure the cut is flat and not angled. I understand why one would trim after sizing- the sizing process stretches the case a little (before and after measurements show a delta). Trimming after the sizing gives a more repeatable length over the entire batch.
I also noticed I would have to force the freshly sized brass onto my mandrel and then spin a few revolutions to trim. The cartridge is now much easier to extract from the mandrel than chucking it up because I have stretched and manipulated the neck ID a little with the spinning. Some cartridges require 2-3 spins, others 5-6 spins, etc, so now I have more part to part variations in the ID dimension.
My thinking is that trimming prior to sizing may increase variations in brass length, but more repeatable neck tension. Granted, a loose fit on the mandrel introduces some 'wobble' into the cut, which may be a factor.
From what I have gleaned from some reloading forums, they seem to spend a lot of time fussing over the ID/OD of that neck and the tension it imparts on the projectile. Trimming after sizing would give a more repeatable neck tension.
For what it's worth, I have tried both and couldn't prove definitively one is better than the other. I am just curious if anyone else has chased this rabbit down the hole and what they found at the bottom?
I am conflicted on this. I own 2 manual trimmers (Reading & Forster). Each uses a caliber-specific mandrel to pilot the case and ensure the cut is flat and not angled. I understand why one would trim after sizing- the sizing process stretches the case a little (before and after measurements show a delta). Trimming after the sizing gives a more repeatable length over the entire batch.
I also noticed I would have to force the freshly sized brass onto my mandrel and then spin a few revolutions to trim. The cartridge is now much easier to extract from the mandrel than chucking it up because I have stretched and manipulated the neck ID a little with the spinning. Some cartridges require 2-3 spins, others 5-6 spins, etc, so now I have more part to part variations in the ID dimension.
My thinking is that trimming prior to sizing may increase variations in brass length, but more repeatable neck tension. Granted, a loose fit on the mandrel introduces some 'wobble' into the cut, which may be a factor.
From what I have gleaned from some reloading forums, they seem to spend a lot of time fussing over the ID/OD of that neck and the tension it imparts on the projectile. Trimming after sizing would give a more repeatable neck tension.
For what it's worth, I have tried both and couldn't prove definitively one is better than the other. I am just curious if anyone else has chased this rabbit down the hole and what they found at the bottom?