I am needing a suggestion for everyday use/hunting bino's for under $300 - 400 Range. What are your thoughts, thanks in advanced!
Since you are using it to hunt, I would recommend a 42mm bino. A really good 8x32 would work, but they are not available in your price range. At the moment, the best buy in your price range is the Vanguard Endeavor HD w/$100 rebate. BHphotovideo has them for $249, so $149 after rebate. I hate dealing w/rebates, but nothing else comes close at the $150-$250 range.TheVarian said:
Thanks for the reply. I'd be lying to ya if I said I knew anything, but 8x32 should be good? I'm just looking for some everyday use that can be used for short range-hunting and for recreation. The last thread you had about the good buy binos at Cabelas were sold out. Thought I'd ask and see if you had any other options.
I can't come up w/any good suggestions for a 10x50 in the OP's price range. However, the ones I would consider investigating would be the Celestron Granite, Kowa SV, and the Carson 3D.TxLawDawg said:
Great timing with this thread. I'm sitting in the blind and my 5 year old dropped my binos, and now they won't focus correctly. I'd like some recs on some decent 10x50's. OP's price range is good if they can be had.
Thanks!
There's only two worth considering in your price range, mostly because there isn't much else in your price range. Go w/either the Leupold Pro Guide, or the Vortex Viper.Bigballin said:
What's a good recommendation for 12x50 binoculars in the $500-600 range.
There are two - the Vortex Razor and the Meopta Meostar. The Razor comes in around $1159, the Meostar around $1400. I would much prefer the Razor, as it is much lighter in weight, while giving you more ER and FOV. The Razor also tends to have focus wheels that are much easier to turn as compared to the Meostar line.Bigballin said:
Thank your sir. If I were to double the budget, $1000-1200, what would be a recommendation?
A 42mm objective has more "light-gathering" (not the most technically correct term, but will suffice here), so it will give you a brighter image when in dim light. There is little to no advantage in this aspect when light levels are high, as your pupil will constrict down smaller than what your bino will provide. But when binos of similar quality are compared, you will get a brighter image with the larger lens. A larger objective also has the advantage of easier eye placement, which can be an advantage for some. This is not an advantage for me, as I have no issues w/eye placement with any size of binocular.TheVarian said:
Thanks for the response! Can you explain to me the difference in 42 vs 32? Would it be worth it to move some cash up for the 32?
ETA: I do wear glasses (astigmatism in right eye) but when I'm outside, I wear my contacts.. usually
got it, so you can remove your email.TheVarian said:
Thanks for the suggestions! I'll have to go try some out soon, won't be able to make it up to College Station anytime soon, thank you for the offer. I do have a question about some older Bino's my dad has that were my grandpa's.
"details" at 600 yds is a tall order to fill. Therefore, the only ones I could comfortably recommend are:Watchful Ag said:
Hi Caladan - My dad is looking for a spotting scope that can easily pick out details of a deer from about 600 yards away. Any recommendations?
Hello agcrock,agcrock2005 said:
Caladan, another one for you...
I'm hunting 80-130 yard shots max and was looking to get some 8X42 binos for ~$400 max. What are your suggestions if you don't mind? Thanks so much for your help. I love all the advice on a subject that most people take for granted. I know nothing about this stuff!
I think that if you are what I call a "critical viewer", IOW someone who wants an extremely sharp, bright, and wide view with little to no concern about cost, then I think you would indeed be happier in the long run by upping the budget a bit. There is quite a large jump in performance when you get to the $800-$1000 level. I am one of those critical viewers, and therefore have a number of fairly expensive binos that have made me happy to own and use. I would not be unhappy with a $400 bino, but I can say that I am much happier with more expensive binos.agcrock2005 said:
Man you are a beast. Thanks so much for your thoughtful feedback. Considering I want to buy binos only for 150 yard max shots do you recommend I increase my price range? I thought there would be tons of good of good options for such a short shot? I don't want to buy binos every ten years so if I need to up my range I will do it if you think I should. Thanks for your advice sir!
I can't say with 100% certainty, but I'm quite sure that these are a clone of the 2nd generation Vortex Viper HD, which usually retail for $600 and $800. This means the 65mm version is the better buy from the standpoint of percentage off.Sean98 said:
Caladan/others, any thoughts on this Cabelas Krotos Spotting Scope? 20-60 x 86mm, normally $1200, on sale for $700. Also a 15-45 x 65mm, normally $700 for $350.
It does indeed seem to be that Z-R has gone t-u. No one can get ahold of them, and their website no longer works.Oruc Reis said:
Caladan, unrelated question. Is zen-ray belly up? I have a set or primes (loose hinge) and ed3's (broken focus wheel) I need to send in for repairs. If they are defunct, is there a place that does general repairs?