Outdoors
Sponsored by

Red dots and pistols. Attempt #1 is a failure

5,862 Views | 22 Replies | Last: 8 yr ago by jlwhite
BenderRodriguez
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Optics on pistols isn't a new thing. Just like on a rifle, a red dot on a pistol makes it easier and faster to find and hit targets at speed.

The standard problems with that:

1) Optics on pistols makes them hard to conceal
2) Pistols beat optics up

Problem 2 is mainly the result of people trying to solve problem 1 by slide mounting small red dots. When they work, great. Problem is that many don't hold up long to hard use, and extra mass on the slide of a semi auto isn't always the best for reliability.

So what if you don't care about problem 1 (concealment), and just want the ability to make hits as easily and fast as possible? What if you also want to shoot this pistol with night vision?

Enter the ALG 6 second mount and what is known as the "CWOCK" by the nuts who do Cola Warrior: A G17, with a night vision compatible T1 and a surefire IR light.





Frame mounted so no worries about durability, the dot is mounted nice and low...the 6 second mount is very, very nice. If you're a Glock shooter. But what if I'd rather shoot a CZ? That is a problem.

I shopped around for a while, and found a mount I thought I would try from UM Tactical.



It uses a detent to lock onto the lower rail of a pistol, so is theoretically fairly universal, unlike the ALG 6 second mount which is a Glock exclusive. Mount the rail, pinch the top together and attach the optic of your choice to the top rail. Cheap enough, thought I would give it a try.

The pros: It is very easy to put on, and well made.

The cons: Look at how high my damn optic is:



Height is not ideal, but it mounted securely so I thought we'd go try it out at the range. Unfortunately, I ran into trouble there. Using the PA microdot and this rail, I didn't have enough adjustment in the scope to zero the dot. At 5 yards it was close...Point of Aim was about 2"-3" over Point of Impact. But as you back up further, the problem magnifies. At 25 yards I was aiming at the A head box of a standard IPSC target and hitting the middle of the torso A box. (pic for those unfamiliar with IPSC targets)



I simply can't get the dot adjusted to POA/POI with the current set up. I put a call in to UM Tactical who were very polite and quick to respond. Owner is going to take a look at the problem tomorrow and get back to me. They make shims for other more standard pistol optic options, but not for Aimpoint/PA style mounts.

If I can get a shim to adjust the dot, despite the height over bore I can make this work. If I can't, its either a new optic, drilling the slide of one of my CZs for a CZ custom frame mount and a new optic, or back on the Glock train if I want to build a red dot pistol. None of those options sound like a lot of fun, so I'm hoping UM Tactical can come up with a shim for me.

I'd kill for ALG to come out with a CZ compatible 6 second mount, but I don't ever see that happening. Frankly, if UM went to a flat top plate pre drilled to mount optics instead of the current rail set up you could mount an optic a good inch lower, which would be great.

Despite not getting it perfectly zeroed, between spending time with this at the range today, and shooting CWOCKs and USPSA open guns with frame mounted optics in the past, I'm convinced they're a great way to go if your priorities are speed and precision. There is no better way to make fast accurate hits than a frame mounted dot.

Maybe I just need to find a machine shop to do some work for me and introduce a new CZ accessory to the world.

Dr. Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Problem 2 is mainly the result of people trying to solve problem 1 by slide mounting small red dots. When they work, great. Problem is that many don't hold up long to hard use, and extra mass on the slide of a semi auto isn't always the best for reliability.

Is this part of your post in reference to how every tacticool bro out there these days is mounting trijicon RMRs on their Glocks? Not saying it's necessarily a bad idea. I just haven't spent enough time around one to comment on reliability. Can't deny its appeal though.
Mr. Dubi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Even a mini red dot sits much higher than you are used to using. Some folks use a pistol red dot with no cowitness sights, but I was totally unable to. I needed the sights to get initial sight alignment, especially when I first started.

I don't see a great speed advantage with the red dot, my problem is I am getting very farsighted, so I could no longer make out the front sight. With the dot, I can make farther, more precise shots than I was ever able to with irons--I rang an IPSC silhouette at 150 yards four out of five tries a couple weeks ago. I am avle to clear a Texas Star usually 1:1 or at least 5:7 shots now, rather than a mag dump as in the past.

On the close up stuff, I find the dot slower than irons, or even point shooting for the A zone. The problem is the dot jumps out of the window with recoil. If you have a compensated open gun with a frame mounted red dot, that is a totally different game though: for a red dot to work to its full potential, the gun needs to shoot flat.
BenderRodriguez
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Angry Panda said:

Quote:

Problem 2 is mainly the result of people trying to solve problem 1 by slide mounting small red dots. When they work, great. Problem is that many don't hold up long to hard use, and extra mass on the slide of a semi auto isn't always the best for reliability.

Is this part of your post in reference to how every tacticool bro out there these days is mounting trijicon RMRs on their Glocks? Not saying it's necessarily a bad idea. I just haven't spent enough time around one to comment on reliability. Can't deny its appeal though.

Yes. If you're going to not shoot much and just carry it, they're pretty reliable.

A lot of the guys competing in the optics divisions seem to struggle keeping slide mounted red dots running for more than a season or two of shooting.

SECeded
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dr. Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks Bender; that's good info. I'm not really in that world, so I didn't have a frame of reference.

Cue, "The More You Know" gif.
BenderRodriguez
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married an Aggie Lady said:

Quote:

If I can't, its either a new optic, drilling the slide of one of my CZs for a CZ custom frame mount and a new optic, or back on the Glock train if I want to build a red dot pistol.
I solved this problem by buying CZ clones from Tanfoglio (EAA Witness) with pre-tapped frames.


Do they mount H1/T1 red dots or just the standard pistol optics?
Mr. Dubi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The open gun I shot had an old Aimpoint Comp model--from the '90's, which is much bigger than the H/T models... the CMore sights seem to be the preferred sight of today's open class shooters.
TheEyeGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BenderRodriguez said:


Maybe I just need to find a machine shop to do some work for me and introduce a new CZ accessory to the world.


If you haven't done this in about 6 months.... we can probably make this happen. I'm having a lot of fun playing with the CNC doing designs on stuff.
TheEyeGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rail mount on the frame with a flat mount for an RMR style would be ideal and definitely doable....

Hamster wheel is spinning on this.
TheEyeGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Too many things to send out for coatings... already pricing out what it would take to anodize in store.
BenderRodriguez
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheEyeGuy said:

Rail mount on the frame with a flat mount for an RMR style would be ideal and definitely doable....

Hamster wheel is spinning on this.


CZ Custom already has that. I'd like something more like the 6 second mount to use the aimpoint style bolt pattern.

TheEyeGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm already thinking, due to ease of manufacture, that it would be easier to do something modular. Base, different height side risers, then a mount on top. Would make it so that different size guns would just need different risers. Then the mount on top could be switched depending on the application.
TSJ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bender, why stick with the PA or t-1 style? if you have the frame removing a major of the recoil why not an rmr, deltapoint or shield rms? That current config looks like it needs a slide racker while you're at it.

Also a 90deg frame mount would help lowering the sight line with the existing PA.
BenderRodriguez
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TSJ said:

Bender, why stick with the PA or t-1 style?
Future compatibility with night vision.

Because I already have several optics that use this mount and don't want to buy more red dots if I don't have to.

Because they're more durable and have longer battery life, even if frame mounted is less punishing on the optic.

SECeded
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CharlieBrown17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So Cmore sights are actually good to go? Hadn't looked into them any but they show up on my Facebook feed as a suggested ad all the time and just looked gimmicky
SECeded
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JSKolache
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When the mount costs as much as a spare Fast Fire 3...
FIDO 96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
beefiedoubleoh said:

When the mount costs as much as a spare Fast Fire 3...


Yeah. This whole thread is lost on me. Why try and mount a rifle scope on a pistol when you can get a fast fire III or similar.
TheEyeGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FIDO 96 said:

beefiedoubleoh said:

When the mount costs as much as a spare Fast Fire 3...


Yeah. This whole thread is lost on me. Why try and mount a rifle scope on a pistol when you can get a fast fire III or similar.
Target shooters do weird, inexplicable things that cost a lot of money. I learned not to complain.
SECeded
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bradley.Kohr.II
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Slide rides can be a bit trickier to follow the dot - my splits definitely improved when I went to a frame mount, but they don't seem to have a durability issue - at least, not from shooting.

Bender, which slide ride where they running? My Docter did fine, as has a friend's delta point.

The fellows I know who tried a frame mount on a Glock, could not get enough accuracy - admittedly they were trying to run GLOCKs in USPSA open so they were behind the curve from the get go

There was a fellow on the ENOS forum trying to create a mount/optic that would take away much of the bulk of a CMORE by putting the electronics and battery into the mount.

I will say, though, there are probably 10 C-More Shooter's in Open for every one of something else
jlwhite
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have a Vortex Venom on my G20. I use it for hunting and it works great.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.