quote:
They are cheap because corners are cut on quality control, lower grade/cheaper steel and aluminum are used, and the parts are made with cheaper processes. WASR AK's have a similar status in my book. There is a reason that the mid-to-high grade manufacturers list the parts and material types they use and the lower grade manufacturers do not...it's extremely unnerving to say the least.
DPMS inexpensive rifle clearly lists the materials of the major parts.
LaRue Receivers made from same material as DPMS. Barrel material only listed as "Stainless Steel, Blackened"
Noveske first rifle I clicked on doesn't list receiver material or barrel material. Only says "M249 Machine Gun Steel" for barrel.
I didn't pick and choose which to compare, just grabbed the first few that popped into my head and had been discussed in this thread. The DPMS rifle most clearly lists the materials it is made of and is the same type of material as the LaRue receiver, albeit forged vs. machined. The Noveske receiver is also forged. A machined lower is just a waste of money while a machined upper can be better, a forged lower with a few areas properly machined can be just as good. I'm not saying the LaRue isn't made with tighter tolerances and better quality control but the DPMS shouldn't be dismissed. The first trip to the range should tell you if their QC department missed something.
I don't see any reason for a first time AR owner to spend a ton of money. Far more often than not the rifle is never going to be used in a way that it will matter.