quote:
I have not tried any Winchester to date, but I don't doubt your findings. 1133 fps is based on laboratory settings, and there is some debate to this number.
I have not tried the Sumpremes, I will put them on the list.
Surprisingly, all of the 38 brands I have tested will group decently at 50 yds, regardless of cost. The big difference is ragged hole + 2-3 flyers, or just ragged hole (10 shots).
At 100 yds, the cheap stuff gets sorted out quickly.
Do the Aguila SSS work well with the supressor? Do you see a big velocity drop vs non-canned?
In reloading, the general standard to keep subsonic is below 1100 fps, so your 1133 is probably pretty accurate. It all depends on elevation above sea level, temperature, pressure and humidity, so it's a fluid number.
I have't seen the Supreme in .22 in a long time - I'm really not sure if they make it anymore or not, though I admit I haven't looked for any either in a while. The rounds were scary accurate, but the drawback to them is that they seemed to have a high number of misfires compared to Ely or even bulk ammo. Part of that could have been that my setup has a lighter firing pin, but I didn't have that issue with any other brand (at least not as much). Usually if I look for higher end ammo, I go with Ely. It's not too terribly expensive and easy to find, so that's what I've used over the last 5 or so years.
I've never shot the SSS rounds, so I can't tell you much about whether they perform with a can. I can't see why they would not though. If a CB round will pass through my can easily (it's not a small can by .22 standards), then the SSS should have no issue. They are a heavier and slower round compared to most .22 rounds if I remember correctly (something like a 60 grain at around 1k fps?). I really don't know if there is any appreciable velocity drop through my can - bulk rounds still leave supersonic, so if there is any, it's not much.
I also thought that most bulk .22 rounds were in the 1250 to 1300 fps range, with CCI stingers pushing about 100fps to 200fps faster. I don't have a chrono though, so I could be off on those numbers, but my Winchester 555 box states 1280 fps with a 36gr plated hollow point projectile.
quote:
Not to hijack - but we seem to have some .22 knowledge here.
I'm looking to buy some bulk (~5000) .22 ammo from ammunitiontogo.com or similar and was wondering which brands to avoid. I've heard some bad things about the Remington stuff so far. I don't need match grade stuff - just reliable ammo my boys can use to punch holes in paper.
Remington Golden Sabers (and every other Remington, Winchester, Federal or CCI) bulk ammo is as good as the next. You could take a handfull of each, put them in a coffee can, shake it up well and I would bet dollars to doughnuts that you would never be able to tell the difference between any of the brands.
.22 ammo choices are like the Chevy vs. Ford vs. Dodge argument. Everybody has an opinon, and everybody has a rifle that will love one brand and hate another. Most likely everybody has a rifle that is opposite of their other rifle, and a lot of that (I think anyway) is very bias opinion.
Best thing you can do is go buy a few boxes or a brick of each brand and try them out. Whichever your rifle(s) like best, that's what to buy in your bulk pack. Any of the major brands are going to be good, and odds are that unless your gun just doesn't like one particular brand, you won't notice a difference between one and another.
I have several semi .22 in both rifles and pistols, and I can honestly tell you that I don't recall ever having a feeding issue with any brand. A lot of people claim they do, but I don't personally.
quote:
Nearly everything is subsonic out a pistol, FYI.
True. Doesn't matter what type I punch out of my P22, they are all subsonic and suppress very nicely.