It's Gun Control Christmas as TX Dems file a dump truck of legislation

6,857 Views | 105 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Deerdude
CascadiaAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You knew it was coming. Will be interesting to see how many they can bully through the Senate.





Texas Democrats are filing a FLOOD of proposed bills that would TAKE AWAY gun rights for Americans.

Here's what's been filed so far:

HB 218 (Johnson): would create extreme-risk protective orders, including temporary orders issued without notice. A family or household member or a peace officer could apply if they allege the person has a serious mental illness and poses an immediate danger because of access to firearms. The person would have to turn over their guns within 24 hours; a full order would last up to a year and could be renewed. Possessing a gun in violation would be a Class A misdemeanor.

HB 173 (Moody): would make it a state jail felony to transfer a semiautomatic rifle that takes a detachable magazine and is larger than .22 caliber to anyone under 21, with exceptions for peace officers, current or honorably discharged military, and some temporary loans at a range or hunt.

HB 576 (Lalani): would bar registered sex offenders from buying a firearm, but only for registration based on an offense committed on or after Sept. 1, 2027.

HB 103 (Martinez): would expand the state crime of reckless discharge of a firearm so it also covers counties of 500,000 or more people, not just cities of 100,000 or more.

SB 80 (Zaffirini): would prohibit certain transfers, purchases, and possession of assault weapons and would create criminal offenses.

HB 606 (Lalani): would prohibit transferring firearms to, or the purchase or possession of firearms by, people under 21, and would create a criminal offense.

HB 610 (Lalani): would prohibit transferring firearms to certain recipients under 21.

HB 857 (Ancha): would prohibit transferring certain semiautomatic rifles to certain recipients under 21, and would create a criminal offense and increase a penalty.

HB 771 (Sethi): would prohibit transferring certain semiautomatic rifles to certain recipients, and would create a criminal offense and increase a penalty.

HB 806 (Reynolds): would prohibit transferring semiautomatic rifles to certain recipients and would increase a criminal penalty.

HB 613 (Lalani): would require a national instant criminal background check on private firearm transfers and would create a criminal offense.

HB 612 (Lalani): would prohibit a sex offender from possessing a firearm. (prob the only reasonable one)

HB 609 (Lalani): would increase the criminal penalty for making a firearm accessible to a child.

HB 658 (Moody): would change the prosecution and punishment of making a firearm accessible to a child and would increase a criminal penalty.

HB 618 (Moody): would restrict transferring firearm magazines to people who are prohibited from possessing the type of firearm the magazine is made for, and would create a criminal offense.

HB 659 (Moody): would require licensed firearms dealers to report certain sales or transfers of multiple firearms or magazines to law enforcement, and would create a criminal offense.

HB 660 (Moody): would require certain people already prohibited from owning or possessing a firearm to dispose of firearms they own, possess, or control.

HB 712 (Gmez): would address a city or county's authority to regulate or prohibit carrying a firearm in certain libraries.

HB 776 (Sethi): would address expulsion-related offenses involving possessing, carrying, exhibiting, or using a firearm on or within 1,000 feet of school property.

HB 859 (Ancha): would increase the criminal penalty for discharging a firearm in certain municipalities.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HB 576 / HB 612 are probably the only ones which will even get a hearing in the Senate.

HB 660 is just stupid. No one who illegally possesses a firearm is going to turn it in.

Democrats are going to waste an awful lot of time accomplishing nothing.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Psycho Bunny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Surprised one of the stupid dems, didn't pose a bill for background checks at gun shows.
My demon woke up this morning telling me he was tired. I handed him a red bull & said "come on little buddy, we've got chaos to spread"
Featured Video Previews
Wings007Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
who cares Dem voters owned Maga.
Billys Cesspool Enjoyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
FJBx100
AgNav93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

HB 576 / HB 612 are probably the only ones which will even get a hearing in the Senate.

HB 660 is just stupid. No one who illegally possesses a firearm is going to turn it in.

Democrats are going to waste an awful lot of time accomplishing nothing.

But they're going to fix the affordability issue. That's what they were elected to do. Good job everyone who voted blue! Way to cut your nose off to spite your face. You really showed us.
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
Hardcore Greg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
samurai_science said:



Nah, they like this sh**.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Psycho Bunny said:

Surprised one of the stupid dems, didn't pose a bill for background checks at gun shows.

It's there. HB 613
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Psycho Bunny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

Psycho Bunny said:

Surprised one of the stupid dems, didn't pose a bill for background checks at gun shows.

It's there. HB 613

I stand corrected.
My demon woke up this morning telling me he was tired. I handed him a red bull & said "come on little buddy, we've got chaos to spread"
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dang, Lalani and Moody have certainly been busy
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
None of this will pass

But it might in 2-4 years

Federal level is where it will get real in 2 years if the Dems win the White House
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mat Lanticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The blue wave idiots are furiously beating their boners thinking gun control is going to save lives or something idyllic.

It is 100% about making citizen gun ownership illegal. That is the end game. The elites who have coopted the moniker "Democrat" want no citizens able to defend, think, move or be otherwise self sufficient.

They are coming for your independence and using emotional based reasons like "I sUpPoRt OuR gOvErNmEnT mAkInG gUnS iLlEgAl AnD cOnFiScAtInG tHeM sO oUr ChIlDrEn NeVeR hAvE tO dEaL wItH gUn ViOlEnCe AgAiN!"
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CascadiaAg said:



HB 218 (Johnson): would create extreme-risk protective orders, including temporary orders issued without notice. A family or household member or a peace officer could apply if they allege the person has a serious mental illness and poses an immediate danger because of access to firearms. The person would have to turn over their guns within 24 hours; a full order would last up to a year and could be renewed. Possessing a gun in violation would be a Class A misdemeanor.



I have not looked at any other bills being considered but the first one is very troubling gestapo tactics.

Men and women should fear this one. Your spouse can already get an ex parte TRO. This will enable a particularly evil spouse, a mental child, or scumbag attorney to send you to the psych ward and separate you from your children.
IslanderAg04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
samurai_science said:




We have quite a few of these on this board. Played ******s.
montanagriz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
I woukd be okay with the 21 age if they woukd change voting age to 21 from 18. If not responsible or fit enough mentally to buy a gun, then they should not vote unless they are in the military at 18. Otherwise, they have to wait
IslanderAg04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
montanagriz said:

I woukd be okay with the 21 age if they woukd change voting age to 21 from 18. If not responsible or fit enough mentally to buy a gun, then they should not vote unless they are in the military at 18. Otherwise, they have to wait


You think they would raise yhe voting age. They have the genz smoothbrained tiktoc ******s eating out of their hand.
GenericAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They should go forward with that mentally challenged one. Take all the guns away from trans people. Seriously.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So has anybody looked at the senators we have left in Texas to identify who the wobbly ones might be? We need to start working on them now with reminders of what happened to Cornyn when he chose to work with dems on gun control. Yeah, Paxton lost, but Cornyn lost by 30 pts to Paxton before that and his votes for gun control were a big part of that.
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eh. Filing a bill means jack squat. Have to wait to see what makes it to the floor before we know what they mean business on.

And even then, none of it will get past the senate.
Psycho Bunny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus said:

Eh. Filing a bill means jack squat. Have to wait to see what makes it to the floor before we know what they mean business on.

And even then, none of it will get past the senate.

I am curious how the other dems in the house will vote knowing this could be a death sentence.

It's one thing to be a dem from a major liberal district, it's another if you are dem from a 50/50 district.
My demon woke up this morning telling me he was tired. I handed him a red bull & said "come on little buddy, we've got chaos to spread"
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SCOTUS on line 2 lololol
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Psycho Bunny said:

Rossticus said:

Eh. Filing a bill means jack squat. Have to wait to see what makes it to the floor before we know what they mean business on.

And even then, none of it will get past the senate.

I am curious how the other dems in the house will vote knowing this could be a death sentence.

It's one thing to be a dem from a major liberal district, it's another if you are dem from a 50/50 district.

Yep. A lot of those red district candidates likely ran on a promise that they were 2nd amendment supporters and will have to think long and hard about how those promises will play if broken in an election where the shadow of Trump isn't hanging over the ballot.
montanagriz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
IslanderAg04 said:

montanagriz said:

I woukd be okay with the 21 age if they woukd change voting age to 21 from 18. If not responsible or fit enough mentally to buy a gun, then they should not vote unless they are in the military at 18. Otherwise, they have to wait


You think they would raise yhe voting age. They have the genz smoothbrained tiktoc ******s eating out of their hand.


Nope- and thats my point
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sid Farkas said:

SCOTUS on line 2 lololol

Not once they pack the courts with their handpicked sociali....communists.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shouldn't be able to vote if you can't own a firearm
NunnyFame
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is this different from what Texas Democrats typically file during a legislative session? How does it compare to the last session?
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I already lost all of my guns, so we good.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NunnyFame said:

Is this different from what Texas Democrats typically file during a legislative session? How does it compare to the last session?


This is why you don't vote for the Democrats. They keep up with this insanity.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Honestly, I'd rather they spend the next 2 years saying the quiet part out loud than pretend to be calm and in the center for 2028.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NunnyFame said:

Is this different from what Texas Democrats typically file during a legislative session? How does it compare to the last session?

They file all this stuff every session, but this time they have control of the house (for real, not the fake control Rs had under a Dustin Burrows speakership beholden to Ds), they have the Lt Gov picking the chairs and setting the vote calendar in the Senate, and they have the governor. So all of the firewalls we used to have against this nonsense are gone and all that is standing in the way is a thin margin of votes in the senate where all it will take is for Ds to find something a few of those Rs want bad enough to peal them away and get them to vote for it. Not comforting at all.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txags92 said:

NunnyFame said:

Is this different from what Texas Democrats typically file during a legislative session? How does it compare to the last session?

They file all this stuff every session, but this time they have control of the house (for real, not the fake control Rs had under a Dustin Burrows speakership beholden to Ds), they have the Lt Gov picking the chairs and setting the vote calendar in the Senate, and they have the governor. So all of the firewalls we used to have against this nonsense are gone and all that is standing in the way is a thin margin of votes in the senate where all it will take is for Ds to find something a few of those Rs want bad enough to peal them away and get them to vote for it. Not comforting at all.

Watch as the Dems pick ZERO Republicans for chairs, after the GOP has been gifting them a few every year for "statesmanship". Now that the Dems have power, don't need none of that *****..it's only when they DON'T have power that they demand "fairness",
You can turn off signatures, btw
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

txags92 said:

NunnyFame said:

Is this different from what Texas Democrats typically file during a legislative session? How does it compare to the last session?

They file all this stuff every session, but this time they have control of the house (for real, not the fake control Rs had under a Dustin Burrows speakership beholden to Ds), they have the Lt Gov picking the chairs and setting the vote calendar in the Senate, and they have the governor. So all of the firewalls we used to have against this nonsense are gone and all that is standing in the way is a thin margin of votes in the senate where all it will take is for Ds to find something a few of those Rs want bad enough to peal them away and get them to vote for it. Not comforting at all.

Watch as the Dems pick ZERO Republicans for chairs, after the GOP has been gifting them a few every year for "statesmanship". Now that the Dems have power, don't need none of that *****..it's only when they DON'T have power that they demand "fairness",

I hope the senate is smart enough to strip the Lt Gov of that power in a special session before January, but I don't think our current crop of leaders has the killer instinct politically to be willing to play hardball like that.
Last Page
Page 1 of 4 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.