wow.

[You need more than links to frame an OP -- Staff]

can we get some info?

Should we know who this is?

He seemed so normal

fc2112 said:

---

Should we know who this is?

---

He was married to Katy Perry. I believe she is dating the former gay Prime Minister from Canada now.

fc2112 said:

---

Should we know who this is?

---

He's a guy the ultra maga podcast bros loved when he had a YouTube channel.

TyHolden said:

---

fc2112 said:

---

Should we know who this is?

---

He was married to Katy Perry. I believe she is dating the former gay Prime Minister from Canada now.

---

I thought she had married Legolas?

Rapier108 said:

---

I wouldn't trust any judgement by a UK court given how they simply ignore or will not convict Muslims of far worse.

Also, the accusations are decades old.

---

Brand has been critical of UK politics. It's not "conspiracy theory" to presume that plays a role in this.

If you're living in the UK and want to freely speak about their gov/society problems, leave the country first. One way or another the facists will find a way to make you pay.

I assume he lives here now? He should probably flee to a country that doesn't have extradition with the UK. I would. Democrats will hand him over. Speaking of, Bolnasario from Brazil should be figuring out his exit plan ASAP as well.

This is obviously political.

torrid said:

---

fc2112 said:

---

Should we know who this is?

---

He's been a prominent comedian and film actor for 20+ years.

---

"prominent"

Seriously, never seen the name.

fc2112 said:

---

torrid said:

---

fc2112 said:

---

Should we know who this is?

---

He's been a prominent comedian and film actor for 20+ years.

---

"prominent"

Seriously, never seen the name.

---

Have you ever heard the song "Choosing' Texas"?

fc2112 said:

---

torrid said:

---

fc2112 said:

---

Should we know who this is?

---

He's been a prominent comedian and film actor for 20+ years.

---

"prominent"

Seriously, never seen the name.

---

Did you ever watch the movie "Forgetting Sarah Marshall" (2008) starring Jason Segel of "How I Met Your Mother" fame? That might be his most prominent gig even though he was a supporting actor.

In order to stat on topic... the rape accusation curiously manifested AFTER Brand started publicly calling out the British government.

BTKAG97 said:

---

fc2112 said:

---

torrid said:

---

fc2112 said:

---

Should we know who this is?

---

He's been a prominent comedian and film actor for 20+ years.

---

"prominent"

Seriously, never seen the name.

---

Did you ever watch the movie "Forgetting Sarah Marshall" (2008) starring Jason Segel of "How I Met Your Mother" fame? That might be his most prominent gig even though he was a supporting actor.

In order to stat on topic... the rape accusation curiously manifested AFTER Brand started publicly calling out the British government.

---

Probably the Arthur remake, though it was kind of a flop. Still, he is widely known.

pacecar02 said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

can we get some info?

---

20 year old claim years after the fact

metoo2

---

Not exactly. He's got a ****load of claims against him going back 20-30 years, all from different, unconnected women. Some were made historically, like 5-10+ years ago, while others have resurfaced more recently. It's only a big deal now because Channel 4 did a documentary on it and consolidated all of it. In isolation, some of this night be dismissible, but given the scope and historic nature of the claims and evidence, I would say he's guilty.

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

pacecar02 said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

can we get some info?

---

20 year old claim years after the fact

metoo2

---

Not exactly. He's got a ****load of claims against him going back 20-30 years, all from different, unconnected women. Some were made historically, like 5-10+ years ago, while others have resurfaced more recently. It's only a big deal now because Channel 4 did a documentary on it and consolidated all of it. In isolation, some of this night be dismissible, but given the scope and historic nature of the claims and evidence, I would say he's guilty.

---

Sounds like Bill Cosby.

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

pacecar02 said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

can we get some info?

---

20 year old claim years after the fact

metoo2

---

Not exactly. He's got a ****load of claims against him going back 20-30 years, all from different, unconnected women. Some were made historically, like 5-10+ years ago, while others have resurfaced more recently. It's only a big deal now because Channel 4 did a documentary on it and consolidated all of it. In isolation, some of this night be dismissible, but given the scope and historic nature of the claims and evidence, I would say he's guilty.

---

Of course you would

That was when he was always deep into drugs and alcohol.

He should use the Clancy defense.

but but the charges against the Tate brothers are legit.

THAT DOESN'T MEAN THE ACCUSATIONS AREN'T TRUE

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

THAT DOESN'T MEAN THE ACCUSATIONS AREN'T TRUE

---

whos to know?


WTF can actually be investigated?

just a bunch of he said she said now

He was depraved. He appeared to have cleaned up, found yoga and then Jesus. It's not my place to question his sincerity of faith, but it seemed convenient.

He probably did it, 20+ years? And they allowed the migrant rapes to happen unprosecuted?

Sounds like this prosecution shares a lot of similarities with holding calls in cfb. It happens pretty much on every play, but calling it can change the outcome of the game. I doubt he'd even had been charged if he hadn't opposed the globalist agenda.

cevans_40 said:

---

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

pacecar02 said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

can we get some info?

---

20 year old claim years after the fact

metoo2

---

Not exactly. He's got a ****load of claims against him going back 20-30 years, all from different, unconnected women. Some were made historically, like 5-10+ years ago, while others have resurfaced more recently. It's only a big deal now because Channel 4 did a documentary on it and consolidated all of it. In isolation, some of this night be dismissible, but given the scope and historic nature of the claims and evidence, I would say he's guilty.

---

Of course you would

---

A sexual misconduct complaint was made against him in 2009 to channel 4. It was buried by low level management.

A public claim was made by one woman in a book in 2014.

A woman alleged in 2020 that he has groomed her when she was 16.

Plenty of others have come forward with similar stories. Several of them have text messages between them and Brand that back up their claims.


This isn't, "He said, she said," it's, "He said, they said," and he sent them texts apologizing later.


But of course he's innocent and clean as a whistle.

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

cevans_40 said:

---

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

pacecar02 said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

can we get some info?

---

20 year old claim years after the fact

metoo2

---

Not exactly. He's got a ****load of claims against him going back 20-30 years, all from different, unconnected women. Some were made historically, like 5-10+ years ago, while others have resurfaced more recently. It's only a big deal now because Channel 4 did a documentary on it and consolidated all of it. In isolation, some of this night be dismissible, but given the scope and historic nature of the claims and evidence, I would say he's guilty.

---

Of course you would

---

A sexual misconduct complaint was made against him in 2009 to channel 4. It was buried by low level management.

A public claim was made by one woman in a book in 2014.

A woman alleged in 2020 that he has groomed her when she was 16.

Plenty of others have come forward with similar stories. Several of them have text messages between them and Brand that back up their claims.


This isn't, "He said, she said," it's, "He said, they said," and he sent them texts apologizing later.


But of course he's innocent and clean as a whistle.

---

believe all whamen

Then make a timely criminal complaint or STFU


Going to the media is not a substitute for filing a police report

women never make up false claims

FIDO95 said:

---

He became a target that needed silencing when he began talking about Christianity. The apostasy of leaving the progressive left will be dealt with using the force of the government and lawfare. It is a play that has become quite obvious at this point. This isn't justice. This is a power play.

---

Or, more likely, he knew what was coming and he started talking about Christianity so he could build up sympathy from gullible Christians/cry persecution complex.