The politics of AWFL agitprop ("Affluent White Female Liberal" (aka "awfuls")

1,821 Views | 15 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by GeorgiAg
CascadiaAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Like clockwork. Another election cycle, another bogus rallying point to concern and focus lib-fems, both democrat AND republican, and get them to vote against their best interests.

The disappointing thing is so many generally conservative-leaning women fall for this due to peer pressure or basic misunderstanding of what is being done and why.




I hope people have caught on by now. However, just in case, let me try to help:

In 2010 it was Sandra Fluke
In 2012 it was Romney's "binders of women"
In 2014 it was the 'Me Too" movement
In 2016 it was "Grab them by the p****" (Trump)
In 2018 it was E Jean Carroll (Trump)
In 2020 it was Amy Dorris (Trump)
In 2022 it was Matt Gaetz, Hershel Walker
In 2024 it was Jeffrey Epstein et al
In 2026 it is "Cornell 7"

Each of these are election years. In each election year professional Democrats deploy the same process to generate support from "suburban women voters", also known as AWFLS.

These are women voters typically from middle to upper-middle-class backgrounds, who are perceived as politically liberal or left-leaning, often vocal about social justice issues and engaged in activism or virtue signaling. Their gender identity defines them.

In order to generate support, or activate this specific voter base, women's issues and/or sexual misconduct is utilized as a trigger mechanism. Once the election is over, the emphasis and narrative disappears...... until the next election cycle. Wash - Rinse - Repeat.

If you cannot see the pattern by now, you are politically oblivious. However, once you see it you can never unsee it. Hope that helps.
Jugstore Cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can someone help me figure out what's going on in this reply:

Bobaloo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I almost exclusively watch CNBC and sports. If one watches the former, it is clear that every male has an ED issue and every female is depressed.
‘This conflict was begun on the timing and terms of others; it will end in a way and at an hour of our choosing.’

George W. Bush
Counterpoint
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bobaloo said:

I almost exclusively watch CNBC and sports. If one watches the former, it is clear that every male has an ED issue and every female is depressed.

... And about 90% of the entire population has moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (which I didn't even know was a thing!)
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Really time to revisit the whole 19th Amendment thing.
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
100%

People need to start seeing these astroturf issues for what they are. The AI awareness campaign is (was?) the same thing. The Republicans aren't much better - keep your eye out for more salacious stories about one off illegal immigrant violence against a pretty girl or antifa arrest activity in a blue state/city.

It's all psyops to get you to go out and vote for their candidates. Don't fall for it.

..and don't hold your breath waiting for news outlets to expose anything. This stuff is their bread and butter.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Left wing white male (note the Che shirt) having all of his whims catered to by all of the other aggrieved left wing constituencies. I think this graphic is trying to tell us that the white male patriarchy trope is alive and well even on the left side of the aisle. You just don't hear it portrayed that way by MSM and the left because it would be an uncomfortable truth for their side.

Not sure I agree with it anymore with the rise of low IQ non-whites largely ruling the left.
Wildmen03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Left wing white male (note the Che shirt) having all of his whims catered to by all of the other aggrieved left wing constituencies. I think this graphic is trying to tell us that the white male patriarchy trope is alive and well even on the left side of the aisle. You just don't hear it portrayed that way by MSM and the left because it would be an uncomfortable truth for their side.

Not sure I agree with it anymore with the rise of low IQ non-whites largely ruling the left.

That's a white woman taking advantage of several types of oppressed people while crying meaning that she's oppressed as well.

It's about hypocrisy.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wildmen03 said:

YouBet said:

Left wing white male (note the Che shirt) having all of his whims catered to by all of the other aggrieved left wing constituencies. I think this graphic is trying to tell us that the white male patriarchy trope is alive and well even on the left side of the aisle. You just don't hear it portrayed that way by MSM and the left because it would be an uncomfortable truth for their side.

Not sure I agree with it anymore with the rise of low IQ non-whites largely ruling the left.

That's a white woman taking advantage of several types of oppressed people while crying meaning that she's oppressed as well.

It's about hypocrisy.


Oh, you are correct. I missed the flip flops and painted toenails. Granted, they made it androgynous enough that it could just represent white leftists.
Kaiser von Wilhelm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Counterpoint said:

Bobaloo said:

I almost exclusively watch CNBC and sports. If one watches the former, it is clear that every male has an ED issue and every female is depressed.

... And about 90% of the entire population has moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (which I didn't even know was a thing!)


And everyone (meaning gay guys) is hooking up at bus stops and need prep to prevent HIV. Bowling allies and dog parks are also high risk of contracting HIV, so be careful out there boys.

Based on percentage of airtime, at least 60% of the male population is gay and sleep around with every dick they see.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kaiser von Wilhelm said:

Counterpoint said:

Bobaloo said:

I almost exclusively watch CNBC and sports. If one watches the former, it is clear that every male has an ED issue and every female is depressed.

... And about 90% of the entire population has moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (which I didn't even know was a thing!)


And everyone (meaning gay guys) is hooking up at bus stops and need prep to prevent HIV. Bowling allies and dog parks are also high risk of contracting HIV, so be careful out there boys.

Based on percentage of airtime, at least 60% of the male population are gay and sleep around with every dick they see.


I haven't seen it this season so far but the last two years they were running gay HIV commercials all during college football. Just ridiculous.
pdc093
How long do you want to ignore this user?

BonfireNerd04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Will Lucy Craig be one of them?
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Wildmen03 said:

YouBet said:

Left wing white male (note the Che shirt) having all of his whims catered to by all of the other aggrieved left wing constituencies. I think this graphic is trying to tell us that the white male patriarchy trope is alive and well even on the left side of the aisle. You just don't hear it portrayed that way by MSM and the left because it would be an uncomfortable truth for their side.

Not sure I agree with it anymore with the rise of low IQ non-whites largely ruling the left.

That's a white woman taking advantage of several types of oppressed people while crying meaning that she's oppressed as well.

It's about hypocrisy.


Oh, you are correct. I missed the flip flops and painted toenails. Granted, they made it androgynous enough that it could just represent white leftists.


AWFUL/male leftist. Six of one, half dozen of testicularly challenged.

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

In 2010 it was Sandra Fluke
In 2012 it was Romney's "binders of women"
In 2014 it was the 'Me Too" movement
In 2016 it was "Grab them by the p****" (Trump)
In 2018 it was E Jean Carroll (Trump)
In 2020 it was Amy Dorris (Trump)
In 2022 it was Matt Gaetz, Hershel Walker
In 2024 it was Jeffrey Epstein et al
In 2026 it is "Cornell 7"


Epstein is still an issue. Or should be. We still have one person in jail for sex trafficking to no one.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.