Complete makeover of the federal workforce by Trump

1,735 Views | 18 Replies | Last: 14 days ago by flown-the-coop
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


I'm sure we can still find waste to cut. I voted for this.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cut tens of thousands more!
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence - the exact wording of the grievance against King George III is:

"He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance."

This is exactly what I voted for. Outstanding Trump.
"Well, doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" "A republic, if you can keep it" - Benjamin Franklin
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Cut tens of thousands more!


Honestly, you could nuke 50% of the Federal government workforce and no one would notice.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The haters will be here praising Biden for his open borders increasing the denominator.

Folks like to say Trump has broken promises, DOGE meant nothing, and he lied about draining the swamp.

Then you have this.
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This goes in the category of Good Trump.
Helicopter Ben
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Cut tens of thousands more!


Honestly, you could nuke 50% of the Federal government workforce and no one would notice.

I would put that number at more like 90%. Although you might be technically correct because people might actually notice their lives getting easier and/or improving.
normalhorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is there still an EPA? If so, there's not been enough layoffs :-)

Wild note - old acquaintance of mine works for the EPA, in another state. I was absolutely floored when he told me, straight up, his current salary is $225k Not just that, but the benefits are jawdropping (like airfare rates for personal travel)
...take it easy on me, I'm a normal horn
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

JUST IN: In a generational victory, the US federal workforce has plummeted to the lowest proportional level IN AMERICAN HISTORY since the stat was first tracked in 1939, for August


This is because the COVID work (or not) at home, did not want to come back to work.
jagvocate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So many federal jobs are adult day care, pushing emails and spreadsheets and creating nothing, MOAR!
BTKAG97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Cut tens of thousands more!

Honestly, you could nuke 50% of the Federal government workforce and no one would notice.

Except the industries that are over regulated and can't do something until some government "expert" gives the to "okay".

For those of you that don't understand the above statement - federal regulations need to be cut at the same rate as the workforce.
Iced-T14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good! Now pull out of Iran and slash overall spending
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They can now do the jobs that the departing/deporting illegals used to do, or simply learn to code.

I also voted for this.
I don't think you know me.
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Federal workforce down but federal spending continuing to grow. How many jobs replaced by contractors
Trajan88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mooooooore!
Mas89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That would be a win. Less government pensions and other retirement benefits for life after retirement.
policywonk98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Iced-T14 said:

Good! Now pull out of Iran and slash overall spending


Trump tried cutting discretionary spending even more. Presidents can't do it alone. Congress does have to cooperate. But total non-defense discretionary spending is down under Trump by roughly 10%. He proposed 20% cuts.

But until there is a President with a Congress and Senate in complete alignment with dramatically overhauling mandatory entitlement spending, you will never get a decrease in total spending. It's not possible.

We don't have a President that wants to tackle the third rail of American politics. We don't have enough members of Congress that want to tackle the third rail of American politics. That's not a Trump problem. That's not a Congress problem. That is an American Voter problem. Until you get enough of the electorate supporting the right candidates to tackle these issues, we are stuck with massive growth in the federal budget.

The only hope we have is that GEnX will have the courage to do what needs to be done when they stand alone as the oldest generation in America. It's not happening until then. There may be movement when GenX is the larger percentage of oldest Americans. We actually pass boomers in that regard in the next few years. But it will take another 10 years before GenX becomes the dominate senior voter in America.

I'm not holding my breath on this. I'm just saying it's our best chance at radical reforms. Unfortunately GenX is a really small generation compared to Boomers and Millennials. Their power as senior voters will be much shorter lived than the Boomers and Greatest Generation as a proportion of the electorate during peak voting power.

But right now we have no major momentum in national discourse on this issue. A very driven and media savvy leader will have to rise up with a message that resonates and generates energy to cut federal spending and reform entitlement spending. It appears this leader will have to do in a season where young progressive democrats are digging Marxism and communist-lite policies. The conservative and libertarian movements will also be working to clean up all the mixed-messages of MAGA. So it's going to take a master communicator that is a savant of federal spending and entitlements.

Our biggest problem took 100 years to create. It can't be solved inside a country that has federal election cycles every two years.

But Trumps team has actually done as much as they can do in the areas that are under their control when in comes to non-defense discretionary spending. More than any president in any of our lifetimes, even Reagan. But Reagan didn't have a GOP Congress. The horseshoe right and Trumps own undisciplined messaging has done a good job of muddying the very real successes of Trump in this regard unfortunately as we head into the mid-terms.
NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah but how's the debt looking?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There's a thread for that.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.