Liberal California law leads to explosion in child s*x slavery

1,836 Views | 24 Replies | Last: 4 mo ago by texagbeliever
Serotonin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just one more awful case of liberal utopian ideals creating dystopian realities.
Quote:

Over the years, the Blade had become much busier than when Ana started: more girls, more customers, more traffickers idling in their Hellcats and Porsches on the side streets, watching to make sure their girls didn't hide any money and didn't snitch. Ana had seen the Blade expand from three main intersections of Figueroa to more than three miles.

Quote:

[Policing] grew even more challenging when California repealed the law allowing the police to arrest women who loitered with the intent to engage in prostitution. The repeal, known as SB 357, was intended to prevent profiling of Black, brown and trans women based on how they dressed. But when it was implemented in January 2023, the effect was that uniformed officers could no longer apprehend groups of girls in lingerie on Figueroa, hoping to recover minors among them.

Quote:

Soon every intersection from Gage to Imperial had girls waving and waiting to be rented out, some of them imported by traffickers from Oregon or Texas or Alabama. By the end of 2023, the city attorney had taken to calling Figueroa the Kiddie Stroll because so many of the girls weren't even 13.

I broke apart the link below because of racy photo on landing page. Don't open at work...

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/26/magazine/

sex-trafficking-girls-la-figueroa.html
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And the guy who authored this bill is likely going to replace Pelosi.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

And the guy who authored this bill is likely going to replace Pelosi.


Yep. That guy is a demon.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

Rapier108 said:

And the guy who authored this bill is likely going to replace Pelosi.


Yep. That guy is a demon.

What did demons ever do to deserve that level of insult?
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I doubt this was an unintended consequence.
I don't think you know me.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Squat 83 said:

I doubt this was an unintended consequence.

Look at the bill's author's picture. It was the intended consequence.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Serotonin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Squat 83 said:

I doubt this was an unintended consequence.

Fair enough. It's a clear pattern.
Colonel Kurtz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How Weimar of them
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Weiner?
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?

They need an explosion of father's vigilantism.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
titan said:


They need an explosion of father's vigilantism.

The father's likely sold them into this life.

It amazes me how we can know where the crime is happening. Know how terrible the crime is. Yet our society does nothing.
javajaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sounds like a dumb law, but also sounds like lazy policing given that they could pick these girls up when they are in the act of committing a crime or rather about to.
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sex work is real work


- AOC

CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is my shocked face.

Almost like....it was done on purpose.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

titan said:


They need an explosion of father's vigilantism.

The father's likely sold them into this life.

It amazes me how we can know where the crime is happening. Know how terrible the crime is. Yet our society does nothing.

Because we are very letter of the law driven. And that's not a virtue in the face of rampant evil. Border policy is similar issue.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?


You elect bad people, you get bad government. California is chocked full of them. It is truly sad what that state has become, and the price it exacts on the rest of the country.
Serotonin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
javajaws said:

Sounds like a dumb law, but also sounds like lazy policing given that they could pick these girls up when they are in the act of committing a crime or rather about to.

Option 1: Show up unannounced where there are clear congregations of girls and round them up and take them in to fingerprint and ID, saving those who are underage.

Option 2: Stake out in dangerous neighborhood in middle of night, following one girl who gets into a car to a motel without the driver noticing you and then waiting and busting in after X minutes?

Option 1 take minutes and gets dozens of minors off the street.
Option 2 take hours and might get one minor off the street.

It's not about laziness. Police don't have unlimited funding and personnel.

A law like this makes it practically impossible to fight child sex slavery. That's why it's exploded and they are bringing in minors from all over the country.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Leftists only care about the intent they can use to virtue signal to peers or supporters over. They don't give 2 F's about results and consequences because failure only gives them something else they can fantastically claim to be able to fix if given more power, if their narcissism can be fed more. If their sanctimonious impulses can be indulged.
AgNav93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
javajaws said:

Sounds like a dumb law, but also sounds like lazy policing given that they could pick these girls up when they are in the act of committing a crime or rather about to.

Wow. A new low. Goal tending for sex traffickers. Congrats dude. You win the daily new low.
javajaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgNav93 said:

javajaws said:

Sounds like a dumb law, but also sounds like lazy policing given that they could pick these girls up when they are in the act of committing a crime or rather about to.

Wow. A new low. Goal tending for sex traffickers. Congrats dude. You win the daily new low.

Oh come on. I did no such thing. This is a disgusting post on your part.
gravitartx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I read the full article a few days ago, and I was blown away that a law like that could be passed. It's California so I shouldn't be surprised but for them to say that its unreasonable to assume a woman standing on a street corner in lingerie, waving at every car that goes by is a prostitute is insane. It's a really sad situation and is disgusting that the state enables this to continue, especially with underage girls.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
javajaws said:

Sounds like a dumb law, but also sounds like lazy policing given that they could pick these girls up when they are in the act of committing a crime or rather about to.


Hard to do if they're picked up off the street and taken somewhere. Cops have to get a warrant to enter and search, and unless they see money changing hands their hands are basically tied. By the time they can get a warrant and actually do something, they're too late. These girls are smart enough not to admit to prostitution to a cop, too. Cops would have to do a sting operation for each girl on the street, and that's something they simply don't have the resources for.

Even if they do all that, liberal CA prosecutors aren't going to do anything. They'll be released straight to a pimp instead of being charged and held to get them off the street.

Once again, for progressives it's performative politics that are only about feels and looking like they're doing something. They don't care about reality or actual outcomes.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If there is ever widespread legal prostitution in this country, teen girls from third-world countries will be shipped here by the plane load.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
torrid said:

If there is ever widespread legal prostitution in this country, teen girls from third-world countries will be shipped here by the plane load.

This happens today. Girls come in smuggled from Mexico. Smuggled in on boats. They work at massage parlors and cantinas.

Also girls are groomed today. By relatives, by "boyfriends" etc. It happens way more frequently then you likely realize.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
titan said:

texagbeliever said:

titan said:


They need an explosion of father's vigilantism.

The father's likely sold them into this life.

It amazes me how we can know where the crime is happening. Know how terrible the crime is. Yet our society does nothing.

Because we are very letter of the law driven. And that's not a virtue in the face of rampant evil. Border policy is similar issue.

No we really arent.
We are a selectively enforce letter of the law. Which means we arent letter of the law.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.