When are the Ls, Gs and Bs going to run off the Ts?

4,731 Views | 57 Replies | Last: 6 mo ago by dustin999
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Having grown up in Austin I've always been accepting and tolerant of anyone who is a Lesbian, Gay, or Bi, but it never made sense why they put themselves in the same grouping at the Transvestites.

Given the amount of violence being perpetrated by the T's, it's obvious they are the most mentally deranged people on earth, so i'm just wondering if the others are getting fed up with their **** and ready to turn on them.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did the LBG take them in voluntarily or did the T's just hijack the thing? I don't know.

Most of the gays that I know think the T's are as insane as we do. I really wonder if this just another issue that white females shoe horned into existence.
Street Fighter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They let the Ts in to keep the faux oppression olympics going.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
the T's provide cover for the other alphabet letters
Clavell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It will be hard to cut them out at this point, but agree the Ts are totally separate group.

I don't care who anyone loves or has sex with or marries as long as consenting adults. I don't think they are mentally ill for doing so.

Trans are different they believe they are something they are not and insist everyone goes along with their delusion. I don't even care if guys want to dress in drag and pretend they are women as long as we all agree they are pretending.

Edit for typo
Cru
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Communists bring everyone together for their cause or they destroy you. It was hijacked. Pedophilia is up next followed by beastialuty by way of furries.
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Street Fighter said:

They let the Ts in to keep the faux oppression olympics going.


Thats definitely part of it.

WPATH is essentially a terrorist organization pretending to be a medical organization. They have successfully used coercion and threats to control the LGBT movement, the media, as well as the medical community.

flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Street Fighter and W have it right. They will be included until they are a net negative to their thirst for political capital and power.

See how the Dems have jettisoned the Jews. They never cared about the Blacks other than as property to be bought, sold and counted as votes. Immigrants and Palestinians are flavor de jour right now.

But their ol bread and butter keeps going. Gay Rights to LGBTQIA w/ Chaser just keep treading right along with baby killing and political violence.
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
cecil77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lots of LGs are against it. They see the progress they've made the past decades being destroyed.

The animal kingdom proves that about 2-3% of mammals are homosexual. It's consistent. Other than humans, no animals claw off their genitals and then try to emulate the sex they're not. It's a mental illness.(period) And supporting it rather than having the human compassion to attempt to cure it (like with any other mental illness) is inhuman and cruel. Those that do are the true fascists.
FobTies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ts are ok, they just need to speak out against other extremist Ts that mess with kids and women's sports. The LGBs should not tolerate the latter, nor should they tolerate "Minor Attracted Persons".

Some LGBTs are speaking out on this. But not near enough. We have gay judges and CEOs who cant acknowledge biological sex advantages in men (I have personally questioned them directly).

The LGBT movement is going to struggle if they vilify things like gender assumption at baby showers, or Bud Light Men Real Men of Genius, who show their genius by swimming with a penus. People are fed up with places of learning and business becoming LGBT social expirements. Its time we all mock and belittle these spineless cowards. We should shun anyone who targets innocent children and young female athletes.
jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Street Fighter said:

They let the Ts in to keep the faux oppression olympics going.

I've long thought that the Dem strategy of "oppressed" identity politics was going to ultimately backfire on them.

It began with telling hispanics and blacks that they are permanently oppressed and the Dems are the only ones looking out for them. Then came the muslim community. Then, the illegal aliens, regardless of whether they had any intention of assimilating into society or if they just came to cause trouble. Then, LGB community, and most recent, the Trans community, by promising women's sports and locker rooms to them and allowing the worst of their community to recruit at will from the youngest of our children.

Now, many hispanics, who are as a whole a religous and God fearing group and members of the Catholic faith, are seeing the far left as much more damaging to them that the party they were told were racists. They also are becoming more resentful of the millions of illegals allowed into the country to complete for their jobs when they themselves did it the right way.

Many in the black community are realizing that the left doesn't actually care about them, especially if they are the subject of the violence of other blacks. They've been invited to rationalize that racism is the cause of all the problems in the black community, but more and more are realizing the simple fact that the destruction of the nuclear family and the lack of strong male positive influences are the real causes of the problems they face.

Most muslims have no use for the LGBTQ+ community and would as soon throw them off a building as they would stand by their side.

Dems have created a patchwork of "oppressed" that do not play well together. And it is now falling apart.
The Banned
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's hard to get rid of them because they are following the logic used by the L's and G's. The conservative side was saying that sex is for babies. Sure it's fun and yes it also helps the couple connect emotionally, but babies are the natural result of sex (provided both spouses are healthy and fertile). Marriage is the formal union of two people who are committing to make babies and raise them together. The B's are just tacked on because of their L or G activities. Their heterosexual practices aren't what people cared about.

L and G sex clearly can't make babies, so marriage was never necessary to begin with. A man could have made another man his PoA, could have bequeathed his estate to another man via a will, bought a house with him, etc. The only thing they couldn't legally accomplish were some tax breaks. What they really wanted was public recognition of the validity of their relationships and lifestyles. That was the stated goal by numerous organizations. They received that public recognition of their irregular lifestyles with one main, emotional argument: "Born This Way". How can we possibly keep people from living the life that they were born to live?

Born this way blows the doors wide open to any number of other lifestyles. So if a trans person says that they were born in the wrong body, and society has already sided with this logic as valid, there is no way to counteract their argument. The pedos are using this same logic as well. Born this way was the great lie that put us in this mess. And we know it's a lie because of the vast amount of the biological research that has been done, and genetics, AT MOST, play a minority role in homosexual attraction. You can't get rid of the T's until you get rid of "born this way" and L's and G's can't get rid of "born this way" without getting rid of their primary argument for the validity of their relationships.
Jack Boyett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
T is just what you get from the slippery slope of accepting the L's and G's. It's good vs evil, guys. You think you can pick and choose which is ok but just look around and see how that's going for you.
Kozmozag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So lgbtq+ is a birth defect. We can fix those defects with gene editing.
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LGBTQ+

JIm Jeffries had a bit on this recently.

The other letters are fine, but the + can go eff themselves.

LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muy said:

Having grown up in Austin I've always been accepting and tolerant of anyone who is a Lesbian, Gay, or Bi, but it never made sense why they put themselves in the same grouping at the Transvestites.

Given the amount of violence being perpetrated by the T's, it's obvious they are the most mentally deranged people on earth, so i'm just wondering if the others are getting fed up with their **** and ready to turn on them.

MANY of the L and G want to do exactly what you are proposing!

Dave Rubin
Sec Treasury Bessent
Arielle Scarcella
Brianna Wu
Blair White

there is an entire organization formed to protect ghey rights but not for the T
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My trainer is an L and a high school volleyball and track coach.

She hates Q's. T's and +'s. In her own words, "they're mentally ill and set back gays and lesbians to the middle ages".
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just like the abortion folks can't agree on a coherent restriction, the deviant will never settle in agreement on a line between "acceptable deviancy" and "unacceptable deviancy."

When people abandon an absolute moral standard, every action falls within a gray gradient and the only hard line they are capable of justifying is against us non-relativists.

You don't get to choose where to stop on the slippery slope.
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The LGBTQ+ coalition is all just a facade by the M's. Every single oppressed/oppressor narrative traces back to him.


doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muy said:

Having grown up in Austin I've always been accepting and tolerant of anyone who is a Lesbian, Gay, or Bi, but it never made sense why they put themselves in the same grouping at the Transvestites.

Given the amount of violence being perpetrated by the T's, it's obvious they are the most mentally deranged people on earth, so i'm just wondering if the others are getting fed up with their **** and ready to turn on them.

Then what would the LBG crowd do with all of those rainbow flags that they made?
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?

They absolutely need to. LG is about it. B is hard to take seriously, but also see no need to define them firmer either. But wedge away from the others if wish to continue to forge a stable niche. That was definitely being reached before it went "Leftward" and mandated by Obama admin de-facto.
TheEternalOptimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muy said:

Having grown up in Austin I've always been accepting and tolerant of anyone who is a Lesbian, Gay, or Bi, but it never made sense why they put themselves in the same grouping at the Transvestites.

Given the amount of violence being perpetrated by the T's, it's obvious they are the most mentally deranged people on earth, so i'm just wondering if the others are getting fed up with their **** and ready to turn on them.

The Ls, Gs, and Bs were the gateway slide that got us to the Ts.

They need to repent and we must rollback the normalization and acceptance of ALL sexual deviance.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kozmozag said:

So lgbtq+ is a birth defect. We can fix those defects with gene editing.


One of my cousins has one daughter who had kids with a guy then came out as lesbian. Okay, fine.

Then the other daughter came out as well and had a live in girlfriend.

Then she decided she's straight and getting married to a guy in 2 months

Not a decision at all, she was born a shifter, going back and forth because that's just how her body was made.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Did the LBG take them in voluntarily or did the T's just hijack the thing? I don't know.

Most of the gays that I know think the T's are as insane as we do. I really wonder if this just another issue that white females shoe horned into existence.

This is true, and that italics is highly probable.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dave Chappelle's bit about the LGBTQ+ car ride is damn funny.
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As others here have said, LGB was pretty much fine and dandy and no one really bothered.
I do personally believe it to be a sin, but I also believe we're told to hate the sin but love the sinner. Once the T+IAlpahbetWhatever got tagged on the whole thing got kooky.

I do think that if the LGB side wants to maintain the progress they've made (and mostly) kept behind closed doors they need to separate from the added alphabet soup.

Of course when that happens they'll drift into obscurity, and away from the attention. Though I think overall that's what most of the LGB want.
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's a good one too.
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HTownAg98 said:

Dave Chappelle's bit about the LGBTQ+ car ride is damn funny.


Wonderfully simplistic take by Dave.

The L and G think the B is nasty.

The L, the G, and the B think the T is f'ing crazy.


I asked my wife's gay cousin how accurate that was and he said yeah pretty much.
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muy said:

Kozmozag said:

So lgbtq+ is a birth defect. We can fix those defects with gene editing.


One of my cousins has one daughter who had kids with a guy then came out as lesbian. Okay, fine.

Then the other daughter came out as well and had a live in girlfriend.

Then she decided she's straight and getting married to a guy in 2 months

Not a decision at all, she was born a shifter, going back and forth because that's just how her body was made.

My GF daughter - exact same story. Not getting married (yet) but same deal.
cecil77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Notice it seems more females indulge in this particular social contagion than males.

Considering the commitment the sex act requires by each sex, it's pretty clear that it is a social contagion more than a genetic predisposition.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cecil77 said:

Notice it seems more females indulge in this particular social contagion than males.

Considering the commitment the sex act requires by each sex, it's pretty clear that it is a social contagion more than a genetic predisposition.


This is conditioned behavior that has been supported by and advanced by the left. Their goal is to pervert, infect and spread this mental illness to a Sodom and Gomorrah level. There's no playing this one off anymore democrats. You have created this disaster and liberals who have a moral compass are the only hope to saving that party.

It is okay to say you were wrong and that very bad things happened because you truthfully thought what you were doing was ok. Just admit it and reform. Your only way back is to massively shift and demonstrate that you clearly see things have strayed from good and normal enormously
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muy said:

Kozmozag said:

So lgbtq+ is a birth defect. We can fix those defects with gene editing.


One of my cousins has one daughter who had kids with a guy then came out as lesbian. Okay, fine.

Then the other daughter came out as well and had a live in girlfriend.

Then she decided she's straight and getting married to a guy in 2 months

Not a decision at all, she was born a shifter, going back and forth because that's just how her body was made.

I think we all know women that have been traditionally married, or at a minimum traditionally dated, had children, broken up... Then all of a sudden, boom... They're Lesbian.

I've seen it several times before and I really don't know what it is. Is it a later life homeonal, menopause, or pre-menopause thing? Bad men partners? Some other mild mental disorder? I can't wrap my head around it being a life in the closet.
SoTheySay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There are many of us who want no part of it. All we ever wanted to do was get married and be left alone.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kenneth_2003 said:

Muy said:

Kozmozag said:

So lgbtq+ is a birth defect. We can fix those defects with gene editing.


One of my cousins has one daughter who had kids with a guy then came out as lesbian. Okay, fine.

Then the other daughter came out as well and had a live in girlfriend.

Then she decided she's straight and getting married to a guy in 2 months

Not a decision at all, she was born a shifter, going back and forth because that's just how her body was made.

I think we all know women that have been traditionally married, or at a minimum traditionally dated, had children, broken up... Then all of a sudden, boom... They're Lesbian.

I've seen it several times before and I really don't know what it is. Is it a later life homeonal, menopause, or pre-menopause thing? Bad men partners? Some other mild mental disorder? I can't wrap my head around it being a life in the closet.

Its been generally recognized even before it became controversial that women had a less fixed range, more experimental, because so feeling based, whathaveyou. Also its not a generative all or nothing drive. So in later life, left adrift, they settle for some approximation. That seems the best explanation. Unless you want to go with they were always faking it. But its not necessary.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.